The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

37 protocols using giemsa

1

Tumor Cell Invasion Inhibition Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A solution of 1×105/ml Tca8113 cells (200 µl free FBS and RPMI 1640 media) in the logarithmic growth phase were plated onto each Transwell chamber (BD Biosciences), following which 10.0 µg/ml R5 or IgG2b was added. The lower chambers were filled with 400 µl RPMI 1640 media containing 0.1% BSA and 16 µg FN, which was used as a chemoattractant. After 24 h in continuous culture 37°C, the Transwell chambers were removed, and the cells in the upper chambers were fixed with 95% ethanol, stained with Giemsa (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China), and counted in 10 microscopic fields (magnification, ×200) per chamber. Each assay was repeated in triplicate, and the invasion inhibitory rate was calculated as follows: Inhibitory rate (%) = (1 - cells in R5-treated group / cells in IgG2b-treated group) × 100%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Cell Invasion using Matrigel Transwell

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell invasion was quantified using Matrigel-coated transwell chambers (Corning, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were resuspended in 100μL of serum-free medium at a density of 1×104/mL and seeded into the upper chamber with 100 μL of DMEM/10% FBS added to the lower chamber. After 24h of incubation, inserts were removed from the plates and non-migrated cells on the upper side of the chamber were wiped with a cotton swab. Afterwards, the membranes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and stained with 0.5% Giemsa (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) for 3 min. Five random fields for each membrane were chosen to count under an inverted microscope the invading cells, and images were taken for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Viability, Proliferation, and Colony Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell counting kit‐8 (CCK‐8) assay was utilized for examining cell viability. Shortly, transfected tumor cells (2000 cells per well) were mixed with CCK‐8 reagent (10 μl, Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) at indicated time points. After being incubated for 3 h, absorbance was detected according to a microplate reader. The experiment was conducted thrice.
For the 5‐ethynyl‐2′‐deoxyuridine (EdU) assay, transfected SCL‐1 and A431 cells in 24‐well plates were reacted with 20 μM of EdU solution (Beyotime) for 2 h, followed by a 4% paraformaldehyde fixture. After being added with Click Additive Solution, cells were subjected to staining nucleic acids using 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole. Under a fluorescence microscope (×100; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), EdU‐positive cells were analyzed. This assay was carried out at least three times.
In addition, tumor cells in six‐well plates were cultured 14 days later. The generated colonies (cell mass containing > 50 cells) were fixed using methanol (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) and stained with Giemsa (Beyotime), followed by calculating using a microscope. Colony formation assay was conducted at least three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Clonogenic Assay for Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The monolayer cultured cells (250/ml) at logarithmic growth phase were collected, digested with 0.25% trypsin at room temperature for 3-4 min and pipetted into individual cells. The cells were suspended in a culture solution containing 10% FBS, and the cell suspension was diluted and then inoculated in DMEM. The culture was terminated when macroscopic clones appeared in the dish. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were carefully rinsed twice with PBS. At room temperature, acetic acid/methanol at 1:3 was used to fix the cells for 15 min. After removing the fixation solution, the cells were properly stained with Giemsa (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Inc.) at room temperature for 25 min. The cell clones were counted with the naked eye and the colony formation rate was calculated as follows: Clonal formation rate = (number of clone formation/number of cells inoculated) ×100%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Cell Proliferation and Colony Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For colony formation assay, cells were transfected for 48 h and plated into three 6 cm cell culture dishes (1,000 cells). Cells were incubated for 2 weeks in medium. Plates were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and stained with Giemsa (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). The number of colonies with more than 50 cells was counted. The colonies were manually counted using a microscope.
For MTT assay, 24 h after transfection, cells were plated in 96-well plates at a concentration of ~2,000 cells per well and cultured for 5 days. For quantitation of cell proliferation rate, 20 μL of 5 mg/mL MTT (thiazolyl blue) solution was added to each well and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. The medium was removed from each well and 150 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide was added to the well. The plate was measured at 490 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Clonogenic Assay for Transfected Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The transfected cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 1000 cells per well and maintained for 2 weeks. After being fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, the cells were stained with Giemsa (Beyotime). Next, the colonies were imaged and counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Assessing Cell Proliferation via Colony Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell proliferation was measured by the colony formation assay. Ishikawa or HEC-1B cells were treated according to the corresponding protocols and then seeded in six-well plates at a density of 1000 cells/well. Twenty-four hours later, cells were treated with 4 Gy irradiation and then cultured under a normal condition. Two weeks later, the plates were fixed with methanol and then stained with Giemsa (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). Colonies with ≥50 cells were counted using an inverted microscope (Olympus Life Science, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell Migration Assays for 2D and 3D

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-dimensional cell migration was analyzed using a scratch wound assay. SMMC7721 cells were cultured in 6-well plate. The scratch was performed by using a 200 µl pipette tip to press firmly against the top of the tissue culture plate and swiftly make a vertical wound down through the cell monolayer. SMMC7721 cells were fixed with 70% ethanol and captured using a light microscope at 48 h after the scratch was made. The farthest distance that the cells migrated from the wound edge was measured by calculating the mean of three independent microscope fields in each of the three independent experiments.
Three-dimensional cell migration was determined using a Transwell migration assay as per the manufacturer's instructions (Corning Life Science, Corning, NY, USA). A total of 5,000 cells in serum-free DMEM were added into the top chamber. The bottom chamber contained 1% or 10% FBS in DMEM as a chemoattractant. After 24 h, the cells that had not penetrated the filters were scraped from the upper surface. The membrane was fixed with formalin, and the cells that migrated to the bottom surface of the filter were stained with Giemsa at room temperature for 5–10 min (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and counted using a light microscope (magnification, ×200). An average of four randomly chosen fields were counted in each of the three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Viability and Colony Formation Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CCK-8 assay was carried out as previously described [17 (link)]. Briefly, 100 μL cells (2 × 103/ml) were seeded in triplicated wells of a 96-well microplate. After 5-day culture, 10 μL CCK-8 solution (Beyotime, Haimen, China) was added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Absorbance values were expressed as percentages relative to the controls.
For colony formation ability assay, cells were plated in 60 mm2 culture dishes at 2 × 103 cells/well for 7–14 days. Colonies were stained with Giemsa (Beyotime, Haimen, China), and surviving colonies (a colony was defined as >50 cells) were counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

MTT Assay and Clonogenic Survival of Colorectal Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HCT-116 and HT-29 cells were seeded in triplicate in 96-well plates containing 100 µl of medium at densities of 3×103 cells and collected for the MTT assay at time points ranging from 1–5 days. The cells were treated with 20 µl of MTT (5 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h, after which the MTT solution was removed. The crystals were dissolved in 200 µl of DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich). The absorbance of the solution was measured at 570 nm using a spectrophotometer.
HCT-116 and HT-29 cells were treated with 0.25% trypsin and dispersed into a single cell suspension in medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco) prior to use. Cells were seeded into culture dishes at a density of 200 cells/dish and cultured in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C for 2–3 weeks. When cell clones appeared, they were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10–30 min. Then, the cells were stained with Giemsa (Beyotime) for 10–30 min and counted under a light microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!