The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Eclipse e400 compound microscope

Manufactured by Nikon

The Eclipse E400 is a compound microscope designed for laboratory use. It features long-working-distance objectives, coarse and fine focus adjustments, and a mechanical stage. The Eclipse E400 is capable of providing high-quality images for various microscopy applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using eclipse e400 compound microscope

1

Mating Behavior Assay in C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mating assays were based on procedures described7 (link). Males were picked at the L4 stage and kept apart from hermaphrodites for 24 hours, either following 24 hours of starvation during L1. One male was transferred to a plate covered with a thin fresh OP50 lawn containing 10–15 adult unc-31(e928) hermaphrodites. These hermaphrodites move very little, allowing for an easy recording of male behavior. Hermaphrodites were also isolated from opposite sex at the L4 stage and used 24 hours later, and were always well-fed. Animals were monitored and sequence of events was recorded within a 10 min window or until the male ejaculated, whichever occurred first. Males were digitally recorded using the Exo Labs model 1 camera mounted on Nikon Eclipse E400 compound microscope with long-distance X20 lenses. % efficiency (per mating behavior step)=100×(the number of successful performances of mating behavior step/the number of times the male attempted the mating behavior step). % loss of hermaphrodite contact=100×(the number of times male lost contact with hermaphrodite and eventually re-initiated the mating sequence/the number of hermaphrodites the male contacted during assay). Two biological and technical replicates were performed for each experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mating Behavior Assays in C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mating assays were based on procedures described previously 12 (link),35 . Males were picked at an early L4 stage and kept apart from hermaphrodites for 24 hours. One male was transferred to a plate covered with a thin fresh OP50 lawn containing 10–15 adult unc-31(e928) hermaphrodites. These hermaphrodites move very little, allowing for an easy recording of male behavior. Hermaphrodites were also isolated from opposite sex at the L4 stage and used 24 hours later. Animals were monitored and sequence of events was recorded within a 15 min window or until the male ejaculated, whichever occurred first. Males were tested for their ability to locate vulva in a mating assay, calculated as location efficiency (L.E.)36 . The number of passes or hesitations at the vulva until the male first stops at the vulva were counted. Location Efficiency = 1 / # encounters to stop. PHB silenced males were digitally recorded using the Exo Labs model 1 camera mounted on Nikon Eclipse E400 compound microscope with long-distance X20 lenses. These videos were analyzed for vulva location efficiency and % of successful contact response, which requires tail apposition and initiation of backward locomotion. % response to contact = 100x [the number of times a male exhibited contact response/the number of times the male makes contact with a hermaphrodite via the rays13 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histology of Formalin-Fixed Lung Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed lung lobes were embedded in paraffin, sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin as a purchased service by the Benaroya Research Institute Histology Core (Seattle, WA). Images were obtained at 10× magnification using a Nikon DS Camera Control Unit DS-L2 on a Nikon Eclipse E400 compound microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mating Behavior Assay in C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mating assays were based on procedures described7 (link). Males were picked at the L4 stage and kept apart from hermaphrodites for 24 hours, either following 24 hours of starvation during L1. One male was transferred to a plate covered with a thin fresh OP50 lawn containing 10–15 adult unc-31(e928) hermaphrodites. These hermaphrodites move very little, allowing for an easy recording of male behavior. Hermaphrodites were also isolated from opposite sex at the L4 stage and used 24 hours later, and were always well-fed. Animals were monitored and sequence of events was recorded within a 10 min window or until the male ejaculated, whichever occurred first. Males were digitally recorded using the Exo Labs model 1 camera mounted on Nikon Eclipse E400 compound microscope with long-distance X20 lenses. % efficiency (per mating behavior step)=100×(the number of successful performances of mating behavior step/the number of times the male attempted the mating behavior step). % loss of hermaphrodite contact=100×(the number of times male lost contact with hermaphrodite and eventually re-initiated the mating sequence/the number of hermaphrodites the male contacted during assay). Two biological and technical replicates were performed for each experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mating Behavior Assays in C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mating assays were based on procedures described previously 12 (link),35 . Males were picked at an early L4 stage and kept apart from hermaphrodites for 24 hours. One male was transferred to a plate covered with a thin fresh OP50 lawn containing 10–15 adult unc-31(e928) hermaphrodites. These hermaphrodites move very little, allowing for an easy recording of male behavior. Hermaphrodites were also isolated from opposite sex at the L4 stage and used 24 hours later. Animals were monitored and sequence of events was recorded within a 15 min window or until the male ejaculated, whichever occurred first. Males were tested for their ability to locate vulva in a mating assay, calculated as location efficiency (L.E.)36 . The number of passes or hesitations at the vulva until the male first stops at the vulva were counted. Location Efficiency = 1 / # encounters to stop. PHB silenced males were digitally recorded using the Exo Labs model 1 camera mounted on Nikon Eclipse E400 compound microscope with long-distance X20 lenses. These videos were analyzed for vulva location efficiency and % of successful contact response, which requires tail apposition and initiation of backward locomotion. % response to contact = 100x [the number of times a male exhibited contact response/the number of times the male makes contact with a hermaphrodite via the rays13 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Stomatal Dynamics in Arabidopsis Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Treatment of whole leaves of Col‐0 and P35S::MIR167 plants and measurement of stomatal apertures were performed as described previously (Chitrakar & Melotto, 2010). Briefly, plants were kept under light for at least 3 hr to induce the opening of stomata prior to the start of the experiment. Whole leaves of each genotype were detached and placed into Petri plates, and water or Pst DC3000 at a titer of 5 × 108 cfu/ml (suspended in water) was pipetted under the leaves so that the entire underside of each leaf was in contact with liquid. Plates were then placed back under normal growth conditions. At 1 and 4 hr after the start of the experiment, leaves were photographed for the measurement of stomatal apertures.
For measurement of guard cell length, dark‐adapted plants were used to ensure that stomata were uniformly closed. For the measurement of stomatal density, the number of stomata was counted in an area of 0.050 mm2 for each sample.
Stomata were viewed and photographed using a Nikon Eclipse E400 compound microscope and SPOT 5.0 software. Aperture and length measurements were taken using ImageJ Software (NIH, USA), and data were analyzed using Student's t test in Microsoft Excel to test for statistically significant differences between WT and transgenic plants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!