The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using on column purelink dnase treatment

1

RNA Extraction from Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 24 h of treatment, cells were trypsinized and collected by centrifugation, after washing with PBS. To extract RNA PureLink® RNA Mini Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was applied. Then 300 µL of supplied lysis buffer, added with 1% of 2-mercaptoethanol and 300 µL of ethanol 70% v/v; were added to each cell pellet; samples were transferred into the Spin Cartridge for RNA extraction and purification. After washing with Wash Buffer supplied by the kit, samples were probed for 15 min with 80 µL of DNase mixture (On-column PureLink® DNase Treatment, Life Technologies) to remove contaminating DNA. RNA extracted from each sample was eluted in 30 µL of Nuclease-Free Water. RNA concentration (ng/µL) was determined through Qubit® RNA BR Assay Kits (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RNA Extraction and Purification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 6 and 24 h of treatment, cells were trypsinized and collected by centrifugation. PureLink® RNA Mini Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to extract the RNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An appropriate volume of supplied lysis buffer, supplemented with 1% of 2-mercaptoethanol, was added to each pellet followed by one volume of ethanol 70% v/v. Samples were then transferred into the spin cartridge for RNA extraction and purification. DNA contamination was removed by incubating samples with 80 µL of a DNase mixture (On-column PureLink® Dnase Treatment, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 15 min. The extracted RNA was then eluted in 30 µL of nuclease-free water and its concentration (ng/µL) was determined through Qubit® RNA BR Assay Kits (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), using a Qbit 4 Fluorometer reader (ThermoFisher Scientific Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nematode gene expression in response to bacterial exposure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synchronized wild-type nematodes were reared at 20°C on E. coli OP50 from egg to larval stage 4 (L4). L4s were then washed off the rearing plates with M9 buffer and placed onto several lawns of S. maltophilia JCMS, K279a or OP50. After 24 h of feeding on the treatment bacteria at 25°C, young adult nematodes were collected in M9 buffer and lysed in TRIzol® reagent (Life Technologies). Only non-contaminated, un-starved nematode populations were used. This bulk extraction was considered one biological replicate and was repeated four times for each bacterial treatment for the microarray experiment and three times for RT qPCR analyses. RNA extraction and DNAse treatment were performed using the PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen) and on-column PureLink® DNase Treatment (Invitrogen). RNA quality was checked by visualizing 28S and 18S rRNA bands using gel electrophoresis and checking 260/280 and 260/230 absorbance ratios using a NanoDrop™ 2000 Spectrophotometer. RNA extraction was performed similarly for downstream applications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tissue Homogenization and RNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were homogenized in a Precellys 24 tissue homogenizer (Bertin Technologies) at 4000 rpm (skin samples) or 2500 rpm (gut samples) twice for 10 seconds. Total RNA was extracted using the Purelink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen™) following the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA was removed by using the On-Column Purelink DNase Treatment (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Aliquots of the extracted RNA were immediately frozen at - 80°C. The concentration and quality of the RNA extract was assessed with a Nanodrop One Microvolume Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific™). Prior to cDNA synthesis, the RNA samples were diluted to 100 ng/µl, and a total amount of 800 ng was used for each cDNA synthesis reaction using the iScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptional Response to Bacterial Exposure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild-type nematodes were synchronized by bleaching, plated on E. coli OP50, and maintained at 20 °C. Synchronized larval stage 4 (L4) worms were washed several times in M9 buffer and transferred to treatment bacteria or E. coli OP50. Treatments included S. maltophilia strains K279a, JCMS, and JV3. After 12 h of exposure to treatment bacteria at 25 °C, worms were collected in M9 buffer and lysed in TRIzol® (Life Technologies). 12 h of exposure to treatments was chosen because at this point bacterial accumulation in the intestine has begun [12 (link)], but almost all worms in each treatment were still alive. Only non-contaminated, un-starved populations were used for RNA extraction, and three biological replicates were collected for each treatment. Bulk RNA was extracted from these populations using PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen), and DNase treated using On-Column PureLink® DNase Treatment (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA quality was checked by determining 260/280 and 260/230 absorbance ratios using a NanoDrop™ 8000 Spectrophotometer and observation of 18S and 28S rRNA bands using gel electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Soybean Seed RNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seeds from each soybean line were collected at the development stage of seeds or R7 stage [73 DAF (Day After Flowering), beginning of seed maturity] and were immediately submerged in liquid nitrogen and then stored at − 80 °C prior to RNA extraction. Seeds were ground in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle, which were cooled down using liquid nitrogen after decontamination by ELIMINase (Decone Labs, Inc., King of Prussia, PA) and RNAse-free water. RNA extraction was performed using the Purelink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Approximately 100 mg of ground seed tissue was homogenized in 1.0 ml of lysis buffer containing 1% 2-mercaptoethanol using vortex to disperse the sample. Genomic DNA contamination was removed using the On-column Purelink DNase treatment (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The quality and quantity of RNA were assessed by the QIAxcel Advanced System and QIAxpert System Spectrophotometer (QIAGEN GmBH, Hilden, Germany), respectively. RNA samples were stored at − 80 °C until cDNA synthesis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Vitro Differentiation of Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hyclone Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Fisher), Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, ScienCell), chick embryo extract (CEE, MP Biomedical), N2 (Invitrogen), B27 (Invitrogen), Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF, Sino Biological Inc.), retinoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich), 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich), Penicillin/Streptomycin (P/S, ScienCell) were procured. PureLink® RNA Mini Kit, TRIzol®, On-column PureLink® DNase Treatment, and High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit were purchased from Invitrogen. Primers were obtained from Integrated DNA Technology. MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay kit and cellular dimethyl sulfoxide (cDMSO) were purchased from ATCC. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxic assay kit was supplied by BIOO Scientific. Diethylenetriamine NONOate (DETA-NO) and Amino-2-borono-hexanoic acid (ABH) were purchased from Cayman Chemical. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) were obtained from Sino Biomedical Laboratories and Peprotech, respectively. Absorbance was determined using and Molecular Devices micro plate reader and SoftMax Pro software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Total RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Exp.1, total RNA was extracted and cDNA synthesized as previously described (Gomez de la Torre Canny et al., 2022 (link)). In brief, gut and skin samples were homogenized and total RNA was extracted using the Purelink™ RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen™), then treated with DNase (On-Column Purelink DNase Treatment; Invitrogen), and immediately frozen at – 80°C. The iScript™ cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad) was used for cDNA synthesis with 800 ng DNase treated RNA as template, following the manufacturer’s instructions.
For samples collected in Exp.2, DNA was extracted from skin, gut and water samples using a KingFisher Flex instrument with the ZymoBIOMICS™ 96 MagBead DNA kit. First, all samples were homogenized and lysed in 750 μl lysis buffer from the kit by vortexing them horizontally in 2 ml screwcap tubes with 1.4 mm Zirconium beads for 45 min. DNA was extracted from 300 μl lysate following the kit’s protocol for the KingFisher Flex (50 μl DNAse-free water was used for elution) and samples were frozen at −20°C until examination. For a few samples we could not generate 16S rRNA gene amplicons, here, the DNA extraction was repeated using the remaining 400 μl of the lysate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transcriptomic analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans exposed to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild-type nematodes were synchronized by bleaching, plated on E. coli OP50, and maintained at 20° C. Synchronized larval stage 4 (L4) worms were washed several times in M9 buffer and transferred to treatment bacteria or E. coli OP50. Treatments included S. maltophilia strains K279a, JCMS, and JV3. After 12 hours of exposure to treatment bacteria at 25° C, worms were collected in M9 buffer and lysed in TRIzol® (Life Technologies). 12 hours of exposure to treatments was chosen because at this point bacterial accumulation in the intestine has begun [12] , but almost all worms in each treatment were still alive. Only non-contaminated, un-starved populations were used for RNA extraction, and three biological replicates were collected for each treatment. Bulk RNA was extracted from these populations using PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen), and DNase treated using On-Column PureLink® DNase Treatment (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. RNA quality was checked by determining 260/280 and 260/230 absorbance ratios using a NanoDrop TM 8000 Spectrophotometer and observation of 18S and 28S rRNA bands using gel electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transcriptomic analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans exposed to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild-type nematodes were synchronized by bleaching, plated on E. coli OP50, and maintained at 20° C. Synchronized larval stage 4 (L4) worms were washed several times in M9 buffer and transferred to treatment bacteria or E. coli OP50. Treatments included S. maltophilia strains K279a, JCMS, and JV3. After 12 hours of exposure to treatment bacteria at 25° C, worms were collected in M9 buffer and lysed in TRIzol® (Life Technologies). 12 hours of exposure to treatments was chosen because at this point bacterial accumulation in the intestine has begun [12] , but almost all worms in each treatment were still alive. Only non-contaminated, un-starved populations were used for RNA extraction, and three biological replicates were collected for each treatment. Bulk RNA was extracted from these populations using PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen), and DNase treated using On-Column PureLink® DNase Treatment (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. RNA quality was checked by determining 260/280 and 260/230 absorbance ratios using a NanoDrop TM 8000 Spectrophotometer and observation of 18S and 28S rRNA bands using gel electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!