The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Waters chromatographic system

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States

The Waters chromatographic system is a versatile analytical tool used to separate, identify, and quantify components within a complex mixture. It consists of a series of interconnected modules that work together to perform high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) analyses. The core function of the system is to facilitate the separation, detection, and measurement of analytes with high precision and accuracy.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using waters chromatographic system

1

Quantitative Analysis of Free Polyamines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free polyamines were extracted and measured as described previously (Chen et al., 2013 (link)). Leaves (0.5 g) were extracted in 5 ml of 5% (v/v) cold perchloric acid (PCA) and incubated on ice for 1 h. The homogenate was centrifuged at 20,000 ×g for 30 min. Aliquots (0.5 ml) of supernatant were mixed with 1 ml of 2 M NaOH and 7 μl of benzoyl chloride and incubated at 37°C for 20 min in dark for benzoylation. The benzoylated polyamines were extracted to diethyl ether, resuspended in 1 ml of mobile phase solution (64% methanol in an isocratic elution), and filtered (4.5 μm filter) before HPLC analysis. Twenty μl of sample was injected into a Waters chromatographic system (Waters, Mildford, MA, United States), supplied with a C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm), and detected at 254 nm using a 2487 dual UV detector (Waters, Milford, MA, United States). Polyamine levels were calculated based on standard curves of commercial standards in combination with a recovery of the extraction procedure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Doxorubicin in Drug Delivery Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to measure the amount of doxorubicin. A Waters chromatographic system (Waters Technologies, USA) was recruited and the chromatographic separation was performed on a Kinetex C18 column (4.6 × 100 mm, 2.6 μm particle size; Phenomenex, USA) at 35 °C (mobile phase: acetonitrile and water (32: 68, v/v) at pH 2.6 by adjusting with 85% orthophosphoric acid; flow rate: 1 mL/min; excitation and emission wavelengths: 475 nm and 555 nm, respectively; daunorubicin hydrochloride, from Solarbio Science & Technology Co. (Shanghai, China), was used as an internal standard). The EE and DL were calculated as the following equations: EE (%) = W/Wt × 100% and DL (%) = Q/Qt × 100%, where W and Q are the amount of drug (Dox) loaded in vesicles, whereas Wt and Qt are the total amount of the feeding doxorubicin and the feeding materials (Dox, vesicles, etc.), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Polyamine Quantification in Plant Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polyamines were extracted from leaves (0.5 g) with 4 ml of freshly prepared 5% (v/v) perchloric acid and extracted at 4°C, followed by centrifugation at 15,000 g for 30 min. The supernatants were used for detection of free polyamines using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as previously described (Chen et al., 2013 (link); Guo et al., 2014 (link)). Aliquots (0.5 ml) were benzoylated as described by Flores and Galston (1982) (link). The benzoylated polyamines were re-suspended in 1 ml of mobile phase solution and filtered (4.5 μm filter) before HPLC analysis. Twenty microliter of sample was injected into a Waters chromatographic system (Waters, Mildford, MA, USA), supplied with a C18 column (Dalian Elite Analytical Instruments Co., Ltd., Dalian, China, 4.6 mm × 250 mm). The mobile phase was 64% methanol in an isocratic elution, at a flow rate of 0.7 ml min-1 and ambient temperature. Identification and quantification of Put, Spd, and Spm in each sample were achieved by comparing each peak retention time and peak area with the standard polyamines, being detected at 254 nm using a 2487 dual UV detector (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Put, Spd, and Spm contents were calculated using standard curves with commercial standards and a correction for recovery after the extraction procedure. Three pots of plants were used for measurement as replications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Characterization of Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Retention data were collected with a Waters chromatographic system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) consisting of a Model 600 pump, a 600 Pump Controller Module, an Acqua 717 plus auto-sampler and a 996-photodiode array detector. Chromatographic data management was automated using the Empower data acquisition system (Waters). Eluent degassing was performed by an Agilent 1200 system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The analyses were carried on a 250 × 4.6 mm Kinetex C18 (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) analytical column preceded by a 4 × 3mm UHPLC guard cartridge (Phenomenex) both packed with octadecyl-silica having 5 μm particle size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Determination of Vitamin C Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The vitamin C content was determined as a sum of l-ascorbic acid (AA) and l-dehydroascorbic acid (DHAA) according to the method introduced by Odriozola-Serrano et al. (2007) [49 (link)]. The sample was diluted using 0.01% phosphoric acid and filtered on a disposable syringe filter (0.45 µm, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). A solution of dithiothreitol (DTT) (1 g/L in 0.01% phosphoric acid) was used as the reducing agent to indicate the sum of AA and DHAA. Samples mixed with DTT in a 1:1 proportion were kept for 1 h in a dark place and at 4 °C before further analysis. The devices used for the analysis were: Waters chromatographic system (Milford, MA, USA), 2695 Separations Module, 2995 Photodiode Array Detector, Sunfire C 28 column, 5 µm, 4.6 mm × 250 mm with reversed phase and Sunfire C18 Sentry guard insert, 5 µm, 4.6 mm × 20 mm (both Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Samples were eluted isocratically using 0.01% phosphoric acid at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Compounds were quantified using UV absorption at 245 nm. The amount of DHAA was calculated based on the difference between the sum of both acids and AA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analytical Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melting points were determined using a Reicher Thermovar apparatus and are uncorrected. NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AM 300 and 400 spectrometers using solvent as the internal reference (DMSO-d6 at 2.49 ppm, CDCl3 at 7.24 ppm); the chemical shifts are reported in ppm, in δ units. Mass spectra were recorded on a Polarisq Thermo Finnigan spectrometer. Elemental analyses were performed at “Service de microanalyse, Université Joseph Fourier”. Reversed-phase HPLC was performed with a μ-bondapak-C18 analytical column (Waters Associates). A Waters chromatographic system was used, with two M-510 pumps and a photodiode array detector Waters 996 using Millenium 32 software. A linear gradient from 0 to 100% methanol in H2O pH 2.5 (phosphoric acid), 2 mL/min flow rate, was used. All starting reagents were commercially available
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Molecular Weight Analysis of Cellulose

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis of the molecular weights of cellulose was conducted employing the derivative of the original samples, cellulose tricarbanilate (CTC), which is soluble in tetrahydrofuran (THF). The DP and molecular weight distributions of the papers were determined by SEC following the method described in previous works [35 (link),36 (link),37 (link)]. The chromatographic configuration consisted of the Waters chromatographic system, equipped with an isocratic pump 1515, an autosampler 717+, a column oven, dual λ absorbance detector 2487 (254 nm), a multiple angle laser-light scattering (MALLS) detector (Dawn Heleos, Wyatt Technology, Hollister Ave, Santa Barbara, CA, US, working at 658 nm), and a differential refractive index detector (Optilab T-rEX, Wyatt Technology, working at 658 nm), which functioned as a concentration-sensitive detector. The separation was performed, employing a set of two 25 cm × 1 cm mixed-bed polydivinylbenzene columns (Jordi), which was thermostated at 35 °C. THF (HPLC grade, J. T. Baker) was utilised as the mobile phase, at a flow rate of 1.0 cm3/min. The Astra 6.1.1.17 (Wyatt Technology, Hollister Ave, Santa Barbara, CA, US) software was employed to process and analyse the chromatographic and MALL’s data. Molecular weights and DP values were averaged from 4 measurements: 2 injections from 2 separate batches of paper.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Brain Monoamine Levels Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detections of the levels of DOPA, DA, 5-HT, and 5-HIAA in brain tissues of mice were carried out by HPLC-FLD [27 (link)]. The brain tissue was put into chilled tubes, homogenized in 0.8 μL perchloric acid (0.1 M) on ice. The homogenates were centrifuged at 11,000 ×g for 20 min and 500 μL of the supernatant was ultrafiltrated for another 20 min. The instrument parameters used for HPLC-FLD are as follows: Waters chromatographic system, Diamonsil ODS column (4.6 mm × 250 mm), mobile phase: methanol-buffer (buffer: 0.07 mol NaH2PO4, 10 mmol sodium octanesulfonate, pH 3.5); flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; injection volume: 20 μL; column temperature: 30°C. Excitation and emission of the fluorescence detector were set to 280 and 315 nm, respectively. The area of peak amplitude was detected and the level of detecting index calculated by a standard curve. The tissue levels of monoamine were expressed in terms of nanograms per gram of tissue. Student's t-test was employed for comparisons between control and treated groups. The results were expressed as mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean). When the P value was <0.05 (), the difference was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HPLC Purification and NMR Characterization of Triterpenes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC separations were performed using a Waters chromatographic system (Waters Corporation, Milford, Massachusetts, USA), composed of an Alliance e2695 multisolvent delivery pump coupled with a 2998 Photodiode Array Detector (PDA). Control of the equipment, data acquisition, processing, and management of the chromatographic information, were performed by the software Empower 3 (Waters). An Eclipse XBD-C18 (3.5 µm, 4.6 x 150 mm) column and a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min of CH 3 CNMeOH (95:5) were used in the analytical phase. The same column with 1 mL/min of the same mobile phase was used for the purification of the triterpenes. 1 H, 13 C, and 2-dimensional 1 H-1 H COSY, HSQC and HMBC NMR spectra were recorded on an Avance 500 spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA) operating at 500 MHz for 1 H and 125.7 MHz for 13 C. The samples were dissolved in DMSO-d 6 , where TMS was added as internal standard.
The vasorelaxant activity was measured using a Grass FT03 force transducers coupled to a Grass 7D Polygraph (Grass Instrument Co, Quincy, MA, USA). Changes in tension caused by the tested concentrations were expressed as percentages of relaxation based on the contraction generated by adding phenylephrine (Phe) (Ibarra-Alvarado et al. 2010) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!