The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

454 flx instrument

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States

The 454 FLX instrument is a high-throughput DNA sequencing system developed by Roche. It utilizes pyrosequencing technology to perform massively parallel sequencing of DNA samples. The core function of the 454 FLX instrument is to generate high-quality DNA sequence data from various sample types.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using 454 flx instrument

1

Bacterial Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial genomic DNA was isolated from liquid cultures originating from a single colony using a PowerSoil® DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Labs, Carlsbad, CA, USA) on 15 February 2010. The quality and concentration of the extracted DNA was verified using a NanoDrop™ spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and by electrophoresis in the 0.8% agarose gel.
Next, 500 ng of DNA from each strain was used for Roche 454 library preparation according to the manufacturer’s protocol (www.454.com) and sequenced in one or two lanes of a four-region FLX Titanium picotiter plate on a Roche 454 FLX instrument (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bacterial Community Analysis via 16S rRNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The membrane filters for bacterial community analysis were cut into small (1–2 mm) pieces using sterile scissors and transferred to 2 ml tubes. DNA was extracted from the filters using Powersoil DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc.) following the manufacturer's protocol, and quantified by UV spectrophotometry (GE NanoVue). DNA extracts from duplicate samples were pooled together in one tube.
The pooled DNA samples were used for bacterial community analysis via bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). A~500 bp region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using Eubacterial primers 28F (5′TTTGATCNTGGCTCAG-3′) and 519 R(519R 5′-GTNTTACNGCGGCKGCTG-3′) (Dowd et al., 2008 (link); Smith et al., 2010 (link)). Pyrosequencing was performed at the Research and Testing Laboratory (Lubbock, TX) using Roche 454 FLX instrument with Titanium Reagents according to the RTL protocols (www.researchandtesting.com) for bacterial diversity (Smith et al., 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from 0.22 μm membrane filters using methods described in Huang et al. (2009) . DNA amplification and pyrosequencing were carried out at Molecular Research LP (Lubbock, TX, USA). Microbial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing was carried out using 16S V1-V3 spanning primers Gray28F 5′-GAGTTTGATCNTGGCTCAG-3′ and Gray519r 5′-GTNTTACNGCGGCKGCTG-3′. Initial generation of the sequencing library utilised a one-step PCR with a total of 30 cycles, a mixture of Hot Start and HotStart high fihigh fi taq polymerases, and amplicons originating and extending from the forward primers. Tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing analyses utilised Roche 454 FLX instrument (Roche 454 Life Sciences, Branford, CT, USA) with titanium reagents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

16S rRNA Sequencing of Gut Microbiome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA isolated from IL and AC contents were analyzed by 16S amplicon sequencing at the Research and Testing Laboratory (RTL, Lubbock, TX) based upon RTL protocols [43 (link)]. Briefly, the V1-V3 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the Gray28F (5’-GAGTTTGATCNTGGCTCAG-3’) and Gray519R (5’-GTNTTACNGCGGCKGCTG-3’) primer set. Sequencing was performed using the Roche 454 FLX instrument (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). For a detailed description of the sequencing and bioinformatic analyses, refer to Ishak and colleagues [44 (link)]. Raw read data was submitted to the Sequence Read Archive (NCBI) and can be accessed with the accession number SRP049961.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microbial Community Profiling of Bioanodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bioanodes were collected at the end of the experiments and kept à À20 °C until DNA extraction. Total DNA was extracted with the MOBIO PowerSoil Ò DNA Isolation reagent kit according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Extracted DNA was quantified by fluorometry (QuBit™ fluorometer with Quant-it™ assay kit, Invitrogen) and DNA quality was checked by PCR. 16-S amplicon pyrosequencing was performed using a Roche 454 FLX instrument with titanium reagents from the Research and Testing Laboratory (Lubbock, TX) according to RTL protocols (www.researchandtesting.com) with bacterial primer sets 28F (5 0 -TTTGATCNTGGCTCA G-3 0 )/519R (5 0 -GTNTTACNGCGGCKGCTG-3 0 ).
Subsequent data analyses were conducted following exactly the procedure detailed previously (Rimboud et al., 2015) . After filtering, the remaining sequences were used for picking Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) using 97% sequence similarity as the threshold. Sequences identified as Archaea and Eukarya were then discarded as they resulted from unwanted amplification. Finally, the abundance and relative abundance were computed for each OTU and rarefaction curves were generated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bacterial Tag Encoded Amplicon Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequence libraries were constructed using the HotStarTaq Plus Master Mix Kit (Qiagen Ltd., UK) and a one-step PCR with 30 cycles. Bacterial tag encoded amplicon pyrosequencing was carried at the Research and Testing Laboratory (Lubbock, TX) using a Roche 454 FLX instrument with titanium reagents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA Amplicons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PIBD-CC: Bulk DNA was extracted from samples using the Qiagen Stool DNA kit. Tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing was performed as described (Bailey et al., 2011 (link); Callaway et al., 2010 (link); Finegold et al., 2010 (link); Handl et al., 2011 (link)) using Gray28F 5’TTTGATCNTGGCTCAG and Gray519r 5’ GTNTTACNGCGGCKGCTG, with primers numbered in relation to the primary sequence of E. coli 16S rRNA (Brosius et al., 1978 (link)). Initial generation of the sequencing library utilized one-step PCR with 30 cycles, generating amplicons extending from the 28F primer with average read length of 400bp. Tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing analyses utilized a Roche 454 FLX instrument with Titanium reagents, and Titanium procedures performed at the Research and Testing Laboratory (Lubbock, TX).
Following sequencing, all failed sequence reads, low-quality sequence ends, tags and primers were removed, and sequence collections depleted of non-bacterial ribosome sequences and those with degenerate base calls, homopolymers >5bp in length, reads <200bp and chimeras (Gontcharova et al., 2010 (link)), as described (Bailey et al., 2011 (link); Callaway et al., 2010 (link); Finegold et al., 2010 (link); Handl et al., 2011 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microbial Community Analysis of Crop Pest Larvae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were pooled for sequencing as depicted in S1 Fig. For the larvae of the laboratory strain, we made three pools, one pool contained DNA of seven larvae that were reared on each of the three plant species (cotton, tobacco or chickpea). For the larvae of the field population, we made six pools of DNA, two pools (biological replicates) for each plant species, to assess the variation between biological replicates; each pool contained the DNA of five larvae. For the field-lab population, we made two pools, one pool of 45 NoAB larvae and one pool of 49 AB larvae. Before pooling, individual samples were diluted to 25 ng/μl and added in equal volumes to one pool. Pooled samples were sent to an external service provider (Molecular Research Lab, MR DNA, Shallowater, TX, USA) for bTEFAP, using the 16S rRNA primers Gray28F (5’-GAGTTTGATCNTGGCTCA-3’) and Gray519R (5’-GTNTTACNGCGGCKGCTG-3’) [46 (link)]. A sequencing library was constructed via one-step PCR with 30 cycles, using a mixture of Hot Start and HotStar hi-fidelity polymerases (Qiagen). Sequencing was performed on a Roche 454 FLX instrument with Titanium reagents and procedures and protocols of Molecular Research LP (http://www.mrdnalab.com/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microbiome Profiling via 16S/ITS Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phylogenetically informative DNA sequences were obtained from each sample by tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing targeting the V3 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and the fungal ITS1 region. This analysis was performed by Research and Testing Laboratory (Lubbock, TX), using a Roche 454 FLX instrument with Titanium reagents as previously described[36 ]. The primers used for bacterial sequencing were 341F (CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG)[37 ] and 907R (CCGTCAATTCMTTTGAGTTT)[38 ]. The primers used for fungal sequencing were ITS1F (CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA)[39 (link)] and ITS3R (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC)[40 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Profiling Vaginal Microbiome Diversity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons from the vaginal tract of study participants were conducted in a prior study30 (link). Briefly, the V1-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene was PCR amplified using the primers 27F-YM + 3107 (link) and 534R57 (link) and pyrosequenced using a Roche 454 FLX instrument. Species level assignments of Lactobacillus were performed using higher order Markov Chain models using the software speciateIT (speciateIT.sourceforge.net)33 (link). For each sample, community state types (CSTs) were assigned to individual samples based on diversity and relative abundances of different phylotypes as defined in the work of Gajer and Brotman et al.108 (link). The vaginal microbiota samples were categorized into CST-I (L. crispatus-dominated), CST-III (L. iners-dominated) and CST-IV (low-Lactobacillus/high strict and facultative anaerobes) (Table 2) Two other well-documented CSTs, CST-II (L. gasseri-dominated) and CST-V (L. jensenii-dominated) were not identified in this limited sample and are less commonly found even in larger surveys of women33 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!