The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Viewer 3

Manufactured by Biobserve
Sourced in Germany

The Biobserve Viewer III is a high-performance imaging system designed for observing and analyzing biological samples. The device features advanced optics and a digital camera for capturing detailed images and videos of specimens. Its core function is to provide users with a comprehensive visual representation of their research subjects.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

38 protocols using viewer 3

1

Morris Water Maze Spatial Learning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MWM was performed to assess spatial learning and memory performance of all groups described above. The used water maze consisted of a circular pool (diameter 100 cm) filled with opaque made water (24 ± 1°C) to a depth of 20 cm, with a hidden but fixed platform, located 0.5 cm beneath the water surface. During all trials, the platform was located in the target quadrant (northeast, NE) of the pool. The used protocol was adopted and modified from Morris et al., 1982 [25 (link)]. The acquisition phase of the MWM was performed over five consecutive days. Mice had to swim on each day four trails with a maximum length of 60 s from predefined positions. If the mice did not find the hidden platform within the 60 s, they were guided to the target and were allowed to orientate themselves for 10–15 s. The escape latency was analyzed in s, the time mice needed to escape on the hidden platform. On the sixth day, 24 h after the last day of the acquisition phase, the probe trial was performed. Thereby, the platform was removed from the pool and all mice had to swim for 60 s. The abidance of mice in the target quadrant was analyzed. Mice were observed with a camera driven tracking system, Viewer III (Biobserve GmbH, Bonn, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fear Conditioning and Memory Recall

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fear conditioning training was performed as previously described25 (link). Briefly, mice were individually placed in the fear conditioning chamber (Coulbourn Instruments) located in the centre of a sound attenuating cubicle, which was cleaned with 10% ethanol to provide a background odour. A ventilation fan provided a background noise at ~55 dB. After a 2-min exploration period, three tone–foot shock pairings separated by 1-min intervals were provided. The 85 dB 2 kHz tone lasted for 30 s, and the foot shocks were at 0.75 mA and lasted for 2 s. The foot shocks were co-terminated with the tone. The mice remained in the training chamber for another 60 s before being returned to the home cages. For the context recall, mice were placed back into the original conditioning chamber for 5 min 16 days after the training. 4-OHT injections were performed immediately (within 30 min) before the recall experiments. For the HC and the NR groups, 4-OHT was injected at a similar time when the other two groups were subjected to recall. The behaviour of the mice was recorded and analysed with the FreezeFrame software (version 4; Coulbourn Instruments). Motionless bouts that lasted more than 1 s were considered as freeze. Data were analysed with the tracking software Viewer III (Biobserve).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Open Field Locomotion and Exploration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were individually placed in a 40 cm–by–40 cm–by–40 cm white plastic chamber in a well-lit room and allowed to move freely for 10 min. Locomotor and exploratory behaviors were recorded using a Viewer III tracking system (Biobserve). Total distance traveled and time spent in the 20 cm–by–20 cm center of the square were quantified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Open Field Exploration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
White colored plastic boxes were used as the open field chambers (dimension: 34 × 34 × 40 cm). Mice were individually placed into the center of the chambers and allowed to freely explore for 10 min. The locomotion and exploratory behaviors of mice were recorded with a tracking system Viewer III (BIOBSERVE). The traveling distance and the time spent in center area were analyzed. The center area was defined as the 17 × 17 cm central section of the chambers. The total traveling distance was used to evaluate locomotor activity and the time spent in center area was commonly used to estimate the anxiety level in an open environment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Forced Swim Test in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the day 1 of the test, each mouse was placed into a glass transparent cylinder (18 cm diameter, 19 cm height) filled with water (13 cm, 25°C) for 15 min (36 (link)). After 24 h mice were again placed in this cylinder with water for 5 min. The latency of first floating, and total floating time during the day 2 were recorded (Biobserve Viewer III, Biobserve GmbH, Germany) and analyzed manually (27 (link), 34 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Food Deprivation Behavior Arena

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were deprived from food for 24 h before the test. After deprivation each mouse was put in the corner of a square white acrylic arena (50 × 50 × 50 cm, 100 lx), facing a wall. A piece of food was placed in the center of the arena. Video recordings were taken and analyzed using Biobserve Viewer III (Biobserve GmbH, Germany). The time (s) before a mouse began eating after placing to the arena and the distance moved before eating were registered (27 (link), 34 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Forced Swim Test Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The apparatus for FST involved a glass transparent cylinder measured 18 cm in diameter and 19 cm in height and filled with water (25 °C) up to 13 cm in depth. On day 1 each animal was placed in the cylinder for 15 min, and on day 2 – for 5 min (Porsolt et al. 1977). The behaviour was recorded by Biobserve Viewer III (Biobserve GmbH, Germany), and the following parameters were calculated manually: the latent period of the first floating episode and the total floating time on day 2 (Müller et al. 2017 (link); Mielenz et al. 2018 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Open-Field Exploration: Behavioral Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each mouse was placed in a square white acrylic arena (50 × 50 cm), facing a wall, for 20 min and allowed to freely explore the arena. The area was lighted with white light (100 lx) (33 (link)). Video recordings were taken and analyzed using Biobserve Viewer III (Biobserve GmbH, Germany). A virtual square of equal distance from the periphery (25 × 25 cm) was defined as the “central zone,” and the outer part of the arena was defined as “peripheral zone.” Distance moved in the peripheral and central zones, number of entries, latent period of the first entrance, and time spent in the central zone were registered (27 (link), 34 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Open Field Test with APH199 Injection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The OF test was conducted as described above for Experiment I, but with minor modifications. Animals were injected with APH199 (0.5 or 5 mg/kg, i.p.) or VEH 20 min before the test was started, and behaviour was recorded for 20 min using Biobserve Viewer III (Biobserve GmbH, Germany) (Müller et al. 2017 (link); Mielenz et al. 2018 (link)). The OF was performed on Day 1 (n = 18) and Day 2 (n = 18) of Experiment IV, maintaining a counterbalance between the experimental groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Elevated Plus-Maze Anxiety Test in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EPM test was aimed to evaluate the effects of APH199 on anxiety levels in mice (Lister 1987 (link)). The apparatus was made from polyvinyl acrylic with black walls and a white floor and consisted of two closed (CA) and two open arms (OA) opposed to each other. The close arms were dimly lit (15–20 lx) and surrounded by walls of 15 cm in height, while the open arms were brighter illuminated (100 lx) and limited only by a low berm of 0.5 cm. The central zone of the maze between four arms was measured as 5 × 5 cm, and the size of each arm was determined as 30 × 5 cm (L × W). The floor of EPM was heightened at 50 cm above the floor of the experimental room. A mouse was injected with APH199 (0.5 or 5 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle 20 min before the test and then placed in the central zone facing one of the close arms. Animals explored the maze for 5 min with free access to all compartments, and their behaviour was recorded by Biobserve Viewer III (Biobserve GmbH, Germany). Risk assessment was analysed manually using videotapes and represents the number of entries in OA while at least one paw remained in CA (Müller et al. 2017 (link); Mielenz et al. 2018 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!