The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using easydrop

1

Characterization of Coated Surface Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The preparation process of the coating was characterized by Raman spectroscopy (RM, LabRAM HR, HORIBA, French) with 633 nm light for excitation. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, UV3600, Shimazu, Japan) was used to analyze the chemical functional group of the sample surfaces. Surface morphology and composition were observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Japan) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, Phenom, Philips, Nederland). Atomic force microscopy (AFM, MFP-3D-BIO, Asylum Research, USA) was used to examine the topography of the PT-Ti, Ti-MCol, Ti-GO-MCol and Ti-GO-MCol-D, respectively. In addition, the wettability was also examined by the water contact angle analysis (CA, Easy Drop, KRUSS, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Contact Angle Measurements on Hydrophobic Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Contact angles of various
liquids (the above-mentioned surfactant solutions as well as the neutral
nonpolar liquids) on three different hydrophobic surfaces (silane-coated
glass, polyethylene, and Teflon) were measured using an optical contact
angle goniometer (Easy Drop, Kruss, Germany). Contact angles were
measured until 1 min after the droplet was deposited on the substrate
to prevent any influence of the possible evaporation and spreading.
One of the hydrophobic surfaces, octeo-silanized glass, was prepared
according to the procedure described in Brzoska et al.15 (link) with Dynasylan OCTEO (Evonik) and showed a contact
angle of 104 ± 1° with pure water. The other two hydrophobic
substrates were polyethylene and Teflon. Polyethylene substrates were
Petri dishes and gave a contact angle of 96 ± 1° with pure
water. A Teflon surface was prepared by placing a Teflon band on a
glass slide and exhibited a contact angle of 118 ± 2° with
pure water. The contact angle and surface tension measurements were
all realized under constant laboratory conditions with a temperature
of 23 ± 2 °C and relative humidity of 50 ± 2%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Contact Angle and Thickness Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 9

Contact angles were measured using Kruss EasyDrop. For the measurement, 2 μL of water droplets were deposited on different positions of a substrate placed on the sample plate and contact angles were measured in the video window of manufacturer's DSA software. Thicknesses of the monolayers were measured using Gaertner Scientific Corporation ellipsometer. For the thickness calculation, the refractive indices of both silicon oxide layers and organic layers were assumed to be 1.46 (T. Nguyen et al. J. Adhesion, 1995, 48, 169-194). Five different arbitrary positions on the substrate were chosen and the average value was taken. The thickness of the monolayer was determined by subtracting the silicon oxide thickness from the measured one.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Membrane Characterization and Porosity Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrophilicity of the membrane surface was represented by contact angle that was measured using Kruss GmbH FNY12MKE Easy Drop, Germany under ambient conditions. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis was conducted using a Nicolet 6700 Thermo Scientific-FITR spectrometer (United States) to identify the functional groups present on the membrane. Membrane surface zeta potential was measured using the Malvern Surface Zeta Potential Cell, Malvern Instruments, UK. The zeta potential of membrane surface was measured in 0.1 mM NaCl at pH 7 using 300–350 nm latex particles as the tracer particles (DTS1235 Malvern UK).
The overall membrane porosity (ε) was calculated using the gravimetric method29 (link), as defined in Equation (1): ε=ω1ω2A×l×dw where ω1 is the wet membrane weight (g), ω2 is the dried membrane weight (g), A is the membrane surface area (m2), l is the membrane thickness (m), and dw is the water density (998 kg/m3).
Using the porosity data and Guerout–Elford–Ferry equation35 (link),36 (link), the relative pore sizes of the fabricated membranes were calculated using Equation (2): rm=(2.91.75ε)8ηlQε×A×ΔP where η is the water viscosity (8.9 × 10−4 Pa.s), Q is the volume of pure water permeated through the membrane per unit time (m3/s), and ΔP is the operational pressure (0.4 MPa).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Surface Energies of PET and PP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dispersive
Sd)
and polar (γSp) surface energies of PET and PP were determined from the
contact angle of various test liquids (see Table S1 of the Supporting Information) on film samples using sessile
drop method (EasyDrop, Krüss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). Prior
to the measurement, PET and PP were hot-pressed (4122 CE, Carver Inc.,
Wabach, USA) at 240 and 190 °C, respectively, under a weight
of 2 tons to produce polymer films of ∼0.3 mm in thickness.
The polymer film was then affixed on a glass slide using double-sided
tape. A liquid droplet of 10 μL was carefully deposited on the
surface of the polymer film, and the sessile drop was analyzed using
the ellipse fitting method (Krüss ADVANCE, version 1.9.0.8).
An average of five measurements was taken for each type of test liquid.
The γSd and γSp of PET and PP were calculated using the Owen–Wendt–Rabel–Kaelble
(OWRK) approach.31 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Contact Angle Measurement of SP Ink

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sessile drop method (EasyDrop, Krüss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was used to measure the contact angle (liquid/solid interface) made by a 1 µl SP ink drop (diameter 1.24 mm) placed on the film surface. All measurements were made tenfold, at room temperature, within 30 seconds after drop deposition and the average values were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Pendant Drop Surface Tension Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The synthesis and characterisation of the glycodendrimers have been reported. [9] 4.1 Surface tension measurements.
Surface tension measurements of aqueous glycodendrimer solutions were performed with the pendant drop method using a Krüss EasyDrop instrument equipped with DSA1 software. The shape of the pendent drop was fitted using the Young-Laplace equation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterizing Surface Topography and Wettability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface topography of 1.9 A, 1.9 AA,
EPD, and A-EPD samples was characterized using a 3D laser scanning
microscope (VK-X150, Keyence), and the surface roughness (Sq) and surface area (SA) were measured using
the MultifileAnalyzer software (VK-H1XME, Keyence) following our previously
established method.93 (link)The surface
wettability of the samples was measured using a contact angle goniometer
(EasyDrop; Krüss) in the ambient environment. For the contact
angle measurement, 3 μL of tryptic soy broth (TSB; Fluka Analytical,
Sigma-Aldrich) was dropped on the sample surface and the images were
taken. The video recordings were saved to the connected computer where
the contact angles were analyzed using a drop shape analyzer (DSA
100, Krüss). The measurements were repeated at three different
locations on each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Morphological Analysis of Digested Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Qualitative analysis of particle morphology was performed on CMTT
and aged CMTT before and after in vitro digestion
using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (GeminiSEM 300, Zeiss). This
was done to assess the general morphology of the particles and to
investigate any morphological changes at the surface of the particles
that might result from the aging process or from in vitro digestion. Surface tension of the SFINTESTINAL was measured
with a goniometer (EasyDrop, Kruss) and the presence, size, and stability
of micelles in the digestive fluids were assessed by dynamic light
scattering and measurements of the ζ potential of the solutions
using a Zetasizer ZS. The concentration of dissolved organic carbon
(DOC) was measured in the digestive fluids using an organic carbon
analyzer (vario TOC cube, Elementar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Material Characterization of R-ST

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface topography of the R-ST was measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM; NX10, Park Systems Co., Suwon, Korea), followed by image analysis using XEI Software (Park Systems Co.). Water contact angle analysis was carried out by a contact angle goniometer (EasyDrop, model FM40Mk2, Krüss, Hamburg, Germany) using a drop-shape analysis program. Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) of samples were collected using Raman spectrometer (Micro Raman PL Mapping System, Dongwoo Optron Co., Ltd., Gwangju, Korea) and x-ray photoelectron spectrometer (AXIS Supra, Kratos Analytical, UK), respectively. The base pressure in the XPS chamber was 5 × 10− 10 mbar. A wide scan was performed correcting the binding energies with C 1 s as reference energy (C 1 s = 284.8 eV). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were collected by an FTIR spectrophotometer (Nicolet 560, Nicolet Co., Madison, WI). All spectra were recorded in absorption mode in the wavelength range of 1000-4000 cm− 1 with a resolution of 4.0 cm− 1 and 16-times scanning. Electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) analysis was carried out by using the TEAM™ EBSD Analysis System combined with energy-dispersive X-ray (EDAX) to evaluate the texture and grain size of the samples setting the voltage at 20 kV and current at 6.0 nA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!