The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fs30 ultrasonic cleaner

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The FS30 Ultrasonic Cleaner is a laboratory equipment designed for cleaning various materials and objects. It utilizes high-frequency sound waves to agitate a cleaning solution, effectively removing contaminants from the target item.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using fs30 ultrasonic cleaner

1

Facile Synthesis of Carbon Dots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carbon dots were synthesized using citric acid and β-alanine according to a previous report [8 (link)] with a slight modification, outlined in Figure 1. We used citric acid monohydrate (Fisher #A104-500, Pittsburg, PA, USA) as a carbon source instead of anhydrous citric acid (Fisher #BP339-500, Pittsburg, PA, USA) at the same molar ratio and observed similar results. Briefly, CDs were synthesized by mixing 1:2 molar ratio of citric acid and β-Alanine, where one gram of citric acid was mixed with 0.9 g of β-Alanine in 10 mL of distilled water (pH 3) in a conical flask. The mixture was homogenized using an Ultrasonicator (Ultrasonic Cleaner FS30, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA, USA) until completely dissolved and then heated for 3 min in a commercial microwave oven (Model#JES2251SJ02, GE Appliance, Louisville, KY, USA) at 70% power level to proceed to carbonization and surface passivation. The obtained brownish solid was then dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water (pH 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Facile Synthesis of Carbon Dots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carbon dots were synthesized using citric acid and β-alanine according to previous reports6 ,16 (link) with slight variations. Briefly, CDs were synthesized by mixing 1:2 molar ratio of citric acid and β–Alanine. 2.1 g of citric acid monohydrate was mixed with 1.8 g β-alanine in 10 mL water (pH3) in a conical flask. The mixture was homogenized using Ultrasonicator (Ultrasonic Cleaner FS30, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA) and heated using commercial microwave oven (1200 W#JES2251SJ02, GE Appliance, Canada) at 70% power level for 3 min to complete the carbonization and surface passivation steps. The brownish solid was then dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Preparing Nanoparticle Exposure Media

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanoparticle stock suspensions were obtained monodispersed in MQ water or sodium bicarbonate buffer (Online Resource 2). FW exposure media was prepared by dissolving 0.26 g/l Instant Ocean salts (Aquatic Ecosystems, Apopka, FL) in reverse osmosis water and adjusting the pH to 7.2 ± 0.2 using ~0.01 g sodium bicarbonate (conductivity 480–600 μS/cm). Prior to dilution in FW, stocks were bath sonicated (120 V) using a Fisher Scientific FS30 Ultrasonic Cleaner (without heating) for 25 s to break up agglomerates as per the manufacturer’s recommendation. Serial dilutions were mixed by inverting prior to making the subsequent dilutions. The concentrations used for the exposures were based on preliminary dose responses to a wide range (0.02–250 μg/ml), and based on the total mass of the material provided by nanoComposix. Suspension concentrations used for the commercial and custom-made ~70 nm AgSi and Si NPs were 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 μg/ml; for the bare Ag NPs: 0.02, 0.08, 0.4, 2, 10, 50, and 250 μg/ml; and for the custom-made ~20 nm AgSi NP: 0.1, 0.5, 1, 10, 25, and 50 μg/ml.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Solubility and Characterizing Compound 3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Solubility was determined by adding solvents in 100 µL increments until the compound was fully dissolved at room temperature. A Fisher Scientific FS30 Ultrasonic Cleaner (Hampton, NH) was used to sonicate the mixtures. The methanol, ethanol and water solutions of compound 3 were then dried using the same protocol used in the SEM studies. The dried material was analyzed by FT-IR using a PerkinElmer FT-IR Spectrum Two spectrometer (Waltham, MA). PerkinElmer Spectrum 10 software was used for data processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolite Extraction and HPLC-QTOF-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen tissue homogenate (30 mg per sample) was transferred to a 2 mL reaction tube and extracted with 1 mL of 80% aqueous methanol (containing 10 mg/L anthracene-9-carboxylic acid as internal standard) by vigorous shaking (VX-2500 multi-tube vortexer, VWR Scientific, South Plainfield, NY, USA) for 10 min and subsequent sonication for 20 min (FS30 ultrasonic cleaner, Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NY, USA). Following centrifugation for 10 min at 13,000× g (5415 microfuge, Eppendorf, Enfield, CT, USA), the supernatant was filtered through 0.22 μm polypropylene syringe filter tips, and the flow-through was collected in plastic inserts for 2 mL reaction vials. The conditions used for the separation and detection of metabolites by HPLC–QTOF-MS are the same as reported previously [48 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!