The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss for windows 17

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS for Windows 17.0 is a software application designed for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. The software is designed to work on the Windows operating system.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

162 protocols using spss for windows 17

1

Statistical Analyses of Dental Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows 17.0. Shapiro wilk test was used for normality of distribution. Paired sample t-test was used for evaluating tested variables (ΔE001E002, ΔL1- ΔL2, Δa1- Δa2, and Δb1-  Δb2). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett's tests were used for comparing the experimental groups with the control group separately for individual materials (natural teeth and composites). p<0.05 was set as significance level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Biochemical Analysis of Cell Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows 17.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A probability value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests for binary and categorical data and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Survival Analysis of Cancer Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and t-test were used to compare the data between the two groups. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of diagnosis to that of death as a result of all causes. Disease-free survival (DFS) was computed from the time of surgery to time of recurrence in the liver or distant metastasis. The Kaplan Meier method was used for univariate survival analysis, and the difference between survival curves was tested by a log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed to analyze the relative prognostic importance. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) for Windows 17.0 software (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL). A value of p < 0.05 for two-tailed tests was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS for Windows 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Quantitative data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance was used for the analysis of single factors amongst multiple groups. The Student-Newman-Keuls and Fisher's least significant difference t-tests were used for pair-wise comparisons. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis Methodology for Comparative Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows 17.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences between only two treatment groups were evaluated by independent samples or paired t-test. Differences between treatments of more than two groups were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) test. Data were represented as means with standard errors (mean ± S.E.). Results were considered statistically significant if the p-value was less than 0.05 (*) or 0.01(**).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gut Microbiome Profiling in Autophagy-Deficient Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were 6–26 weeks old when fecal samples were collected. For Atg5Δhep mice, fecal samples were collected from Atg5F/F and Atg5Δhep mice at 8 or 16 weeks old. For Atg7Δhep mice, fecal samples were collected from floxed Atg7 mice (heterozygous or homozygous, Atg7WT) and Atg7Δhep mice. Both male and female mice were used and equally distributed in different genotypes. Fecal DNA was extracted from frozen fecal samples by using the E.Z.N.A. Stool DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Inc, Norcross, GA). All DNA samples were stored at –80°C before sequencing, which was performed by SeqMatic LLC (Fremont, CA) using Illumina (San Diego, CA) sequencing libraries. FASTQ data were processed by using the Qiime pipeline on Illumina’s BaseSpace servers.
For 16S sequencing analysis, relative abundance of each bacteria was calculated. PCoA was performed by using multidimensional scaling function based on relative abundance at species level using SPSS for Windows 17.0 Software (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL). Heatmaps were generated by using Morpheus (https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus), and values in the heatmap were mapped to colors using the minimum and maximum of each row independently. The hierarchical cluster of each heatmap was constructed using one minus Pearson correlation method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

16S Sequencing Data Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 16S sequencing data were represented as median with interquartile range. All other data were represented as means with standard errors (mean ± SEM). For 16S sequencing data, Mann–Whitney test was performed to identify bacteria with significantly different proportions between different groups. For all other data, to determine statistical significance, Student's t test was used to assess statistical differences between two groups. Statistical significance among multiple treatment groups was determined using one‐way analysis of variance followed by Duncan's post‐hoc test. Results were considered statistically significant for p value < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows 17.0 Software.
For all other methods see the Supporting Materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Profiling Gut Microbiome Changes in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fecal samples were collected from mice before and after HFD feeding and stored at −80°C. Fecal DNA was extracted from frozen fecal samples using the E.Z.N.A. Stool DNA Kit (Omega Bio‐Tek, Inc.). All DNA samples were stored at −80°C before sequencing, which was performed by SeqMatic LLC using Illumina sequencing libraries. FASTQ data were processed on Illumina's BaseSpace servers using the Qiime pipeline. Relative abundance of all bacteria was calculated for further analysis. Principle coordinates analysis (PCoA) was conducted using multidimensional scaling function in SPSS for Windows 17.0 Software (SPSS, Inc.). Heatmaps were generated using Morpheus (https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus). Values in the heatmap were mapped to colors using the minimum and maximum of each row independently. The hierarchical cluster of each heatmap was performed using the one‐minus Pearson correlation method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Atg5 Knockout Hepatic Microbiome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 16S sequencing data were represented as median with interquartile range. All the other data were represented as means with standard errors (SEs). For 16S sequencing data, Mann-Whitney test was performed to identify bacteria with significantly different proportions between Atg5Δhep and sex- and age-matched Atg5F/F mice. For all other data, to determine statistical significance, Student t test was used to determine differences between 2 groups. Differences among more than 2 treatment groups were determined by using one-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s post hoc test. Results were considered statistically significant for P value <.05. Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS for Windows 17.0 Software (SPSS, Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Prognostic Significance of Copy Number in Oncology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) for windows 17.0 software (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL). The correlation between CN and protein expression was evaluated by Pearson’s correlation test. Comparisons between different two groups were undertaken using the Student’s t-test. The significance of association between CN alterations and histopathological variables was determined by Chi-square and Fisher exact test. Overall survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to death as a result of all causes. Disease-free survival (DFS) was computed from the time of surgery to recurrence in the liver or distant metastasis. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for univariate survival analysis, and the difference between survival curves was tested by a log-rank test. In a stepwise forward fashion, parameters with P values < 0.05 at the univariate level were entered into a Cox regression model to analyze their relative prognostic importance. However, the vascular invasion and tumor number components of the 7th AJCC staging system were not introduced into the multivariate analyses. For all analyses, two-sided tests of significance were used with P < 0.05 considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!