The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

39 protocols using dc300f camera

1

Quantifying Cellular ROS Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was estimated by 5-(and-6)-carboxy-2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA, Molecular Probe, Life Technologies, Eugene, OR), a probe that, upon oxidation by ROS, yields a fluorescent adduct that is trapped inside the cell producing a diffuse green fluorescence. For these experiments, cells (8×103/well) were treated with compounds for various times, then medium was removed and cells were incubated with 100 μM H2DCFDA for 30 min in Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS). Fluorescence analyses were performed in a Leica DMR microscope equipped with a DC300F camera (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) with a FITC filter (excitation wavelength of 485 nm and emission wavelength of 530 nm). Representative pictures were selected and acquired by Leica Q-Fluoro Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Microscopy Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following treatments cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS, fixed in paraformaldehyde (4% w/v) for 15min, permeabilized with Triton 0.1%, PBS for 10 min and blocked in 3% BSA-PBS for 1h. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (1 μg/mL) (Molecular Probes). Fluorescence and confocal fluorescence images were captured using an IRE2 microscope equipped with a DC300F camera (both from Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and an LSM 510 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Images were analyzed with the software ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Imaging of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following treatment, cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS, fixed in paraformaldehyde (4% w/v) for 15 min, permeabilized with Triton 0.1%, PBS for 10 min and blocked in 3% BSA-PBS for 1 h. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (10 mg/mL) (Molecular Probes). Fluorescence and confocal fluorescence images were captured using an IRE2 microscope equipped with a DC300F camera (both from Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and an LSM 510 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Images were analyzed with ImageJ software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating mGFP Expression in Somatic Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Selected embryogenic structures were evaluated for the transient and stable expression of mGFP 5, 15, and 30 days after bombardment. Somatic embryos were screened for GFP expression using a Leica MZ Fluo III (optic 0.63 Zeiss) fluorescence microscope supplied with a DC 300F camera (Leica Microsystems, Welzlar, Germany) and a plant GFP filter no. 3 from Leica (excitation wavelengths 470–540 nm, emission wavelengths 525–550 nm). Autofluorescence from chlorophyll was blocked using a red interference filter and propidium iodide staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of CTGF Immunostaining in Heart Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hearts were harvested, fixed in 10% formalin, and embedded in paraffin. IHC was performed as described14 (link). The immunoreactivity was detected using the Novolink polymer detection system according to manufacturer's recommendations (Leica, Nanterre, France). Immunostaining was done using DAB, and tissue sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin solution (Merck Millipore, Guyancourt, France). Anti-CTGF antibody, rabbit polyclonal HPA031074 (Sigma Prestige antibodies, Sigma, St Louis, MO) was diluted 1:100 in PBS/ 1% BSA/0.1% Triton. IHC signals were analysed using NIH ImageJ software to quantify the staining within the heart in a 20x field of view under a microscope equipped with a DC 300F camera (digital module R, IM 1000, Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Monitoring Autophagy using MDC Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Autophagy was detected by staining autophagic vacuoles with monodansylcadaverine (MDC) as previously described [9 (link)]. HCT116 cells (7 × 103 cells/well) were plated in 96-well plates and treated for the indicated times. After treatments, cells were stained with 0.05 mM MDC in PBS at 37 °C for 10 min in the dark. Cells were then washed with PBS and analyzed under a Leica DMR fluorescence microscope (Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) filter system. Pictures were acquired by a computer imaging system (Leica DC300F camera) and three different visual fields were examined for each condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Monitoring Autophagy Using MDC Fluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the formation of autophagic vacuoles monodansylcadaverine (MDC) test was employed as reported [75 (link)]. HCT116 cells (7 × 103/200 µL culture medium) were plated in 96-wells plates and treated with EtOH. After treatment, cells were incubated with 50 µM MDC for 10 min at 37 °C in the darkness. Then, cells were washed with PBS and analysed by fluorescence microscopy using a Leica DMR (Leica Microsystems, Milan, Italy) microscope equipped with a DAPI filter system (excitation wavelength of 372 nm and emission wavelength of 456 nm). Images were acquired by computer imaging system (Leica DC300F camera, Milan, Italy). Three different visual fields were examined for each condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluation of Autophagic Vacuole Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monodansylcadaverine (MDC) staining was performed to evaluate the formation of autophagic vacuoles as previously reported [41 (link)]. For these evaluations, SK-MEL-28 cells were plated in 96-well plates and treated with ITF2357. After 16 h treatment, cells were incubated with 50 µM MDC (Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy) for 10 min at 37 °C in the darkness. Cells were then washed with PBS and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy using a Leica DMR (Leica Microsystems, Milan, Italy) microscope equipped with a DAPI filter system (excitation wavelength of 372 nm and emission wavelength of 456 nm). Images were acquired by computer imaging system (Leica DC300F camera, Milan, Italy). Three different visual fields were examined for each condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Dopaminergic Neuron Loss in Parkinsonian Rat Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mean intensity of TH (+) branches was measured in the injured and control sides in six anatomic levels along the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNpr) and the striatum per rat. Background intensity was excluded from the immunohistochemically stained area. TH (+) neurons were counted in 8 slices of the SNpc (2 caudal, 4 medial and 2 rostral) per rat, as described previously [31 (link), 68 (link)]. The total number of rats was three per every time point for the BSSG group, and six for the UT and mock groups; the rats of the latter group belonged to days 15 and 120 after the DMSO injection since there was no statistically significant difference when compared with the UT group. The immunohistochemical staining was analyzed with a Leica DMIRE2 microscope using the objectives 20x (SNpc) and 5x (striatum). Images were digitized with a DC300F camera (Leica; Nussloch, Germany). ImageJ software v.1.46r was used to measure the total area density of α-synuclein aggregates and TH (+) fibers in the SNpc, and optical density in the striatum. Fiji, an Image J complement, was used for color decomposition from the double staining of β-Gal staining with TH, GFAP, or Iba1 immunohistochemistry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microscopic Imaging Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microscopic analyses were performed using epifluorescence DM2000 LED microscope (Leica) equipped with a DF450 C camera (Leica) or an Eclipse TE2000-S inverted microscope (Nikon) equipped with a DC 300F camera (Leica). Images were acquired using the Leica Application Suite 4.2 software (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!