The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using apreo 2c

1

Characterization of Sensor Microstructure and Tensile Performance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sensor V-groove microstructure is observed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (thermo scientific Apreo 2C). Morphological observation and elemental analysis of the active part of the sensor after coating with Fe NWs and CNTs sensitive materials are conducted using a field emission scanning electron microscope (OXFORD ULTIM Max65). A tensile tester (Opto Sigma, TSD-601, Shenzhen, China) performs a cyclic tensile test, using a jig to hold both sensor ends and a resistive flexible strain transducer with an effective area of 10 mm × 20 mm. The maximum stretch is 10%, and the stretching speed is 1 mm/s or 5 mm/s. The resistance measuring instrument used in the tensile test is the source meter (34465A) from Keysight Technologies, Inc. (Santa Rosa, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of EPS-E8 Biopolymer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A ZEN5600 Zetasizer NanoPlus (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, United Kingdom) was used to examine the corresponding properties of EPS-E8 (1–5% w/v) at 25°C. The microscopic morphology of EPS-E8 was characterized via SEM (Apreo 2C, Thermo Scientific, MA, United States) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. The molecular morphology of EPS-E8 was identified using atomic force microscopy (AFM; SPM-9600, Shimadzu, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology images were captured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Thermo Fisher Apreo 2C). The microstructure images were obtained with transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI F200S) and high-resolution TEM. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded using Cu-Kα irradiation ranging from 20° to 80° (Bruker D8 Advance) to determine the composition of the as-prepared samples. X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were acquired with a non-monochromatized Al-Kα X-ray source on a Thermo Fisher ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer. UV-vis-NIR diffuse absorbance spectra of the samples were recorded in the spectral region of 200–1000 nm with a Shimadzu UV-3600 Plus spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Sample Microstructure Analysis via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure of the sample was obtained using an SEM instrument (Thermo Scientific Apreo 2C, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a low-Vac mode, an accelerating voltage of 10 kV, and an amplification of 500. Ten images from three different samples were analyzed for each experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Electrochemical Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrochemical measurements were performed on a CHI660 workstation (Shanghai Chenhua, China) with a conventional three-electrode system comprised of a platinum wire employed as the counter electrode, a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode and a modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) as the working electrode. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Thermo scientific Apreo 2C, America), Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR, Nicolet iS10, Thermo Fisher, America) and UV–visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Suzhou, China) were performed to characterize the nanomaterials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Structural Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction patterns of samples for the crystal structure were obtained with an X-ray powder diffractometer (XRD, D8 Advance, German Bruker AXS Co., Ltd., Karlsruhe, Germany, Cu Kα radiation, λ = 0.15406 nm), and XRD data were obtained in an angular range of 10–80° with a scanning speed of 1°/min. The test results were refined using GSAS [21 (link)]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Thermo Scientific Apreo 2c, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was applied to observe the morphology of the material. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM2200FS, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was used to detect the structure and microstructure of the samples. An inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, Agilent 5110, Agilent Technology Co., Ltd., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to determine the composition of the elements. An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyzer (XPS, Thermo ESCALAB 250XI, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to measure element species and valence state information on the sample surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Collagen Fiber

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Collagen fiber was characterized both before and after adsorption. A scanning electron microscope (SEM, Apreo 2C, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and infrared spectra (FTIR, Spectrum 3 Fourier transform medium near infrared dual-band infrared light, PerkinElmer) were employed to analyze the functional groups of collagen fiber over a wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm−1. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi X-ray photoelectron spectrometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to analyze the elemental composition of the sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Surface Morphology and Elemental Mapping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A scanning electron microscope (SEM, Inspect F, FEI, and Thermo Fisher Apreo 2C, USA) was used to observe the surface morphology of different groups. The spatial distribution of powder particles within the PDMS matrix after curing has been characterized by EDX mapping. All the samples were gold sputtered and then the analyzing procedures were carried out.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Preparing Beef Samples for SEM Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were prepared by referring to the method of Bolumar, Bindrich, Toepfl, Toldrá, and Heinz [9 (link)], and the micro-morphology was characterized using an Apreo 2C (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Franklin, MA, USA). The samples were affixed to the conductive adhesive, and then gold layers were sprayed onto the surface of the sample. The samples were observed at a magnification of 500 times, the accelerating voltage was 15.0 kV, and electron microscope pictures were obtained. Braised beef samples were cut into 1 × 0.5 × 0.5 cm3 pieces and soaked in PBS (pH = 7.2) containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 24 h. The beef sample was taken out and cleaned three times with PBS without glutaraldehyde. After cleaning, ethanol solutions with concentrations of 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% were used for dehydration, respectively, and each concentration was treated for 1 h. The beef samples were freeze-dried in the instrument for 36 h (FDU-1200, EYELA, Tokyo, Japan), and the microstructure was observed by SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multimodal Characterization of Battery Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of the samples was observed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Thermo Scientific Apreo 2C). The focused ion beam (FIB, FEI Scios 2 HiVac) was employed to cut the electrode materials, and the SEM was used to observe the internal morphology. The phase and crystal structure of the samples were measured by X-ray Diffraction (XRD, Rigaku Ultima IV) with Cu-Ka radiation. The electrode materials of fresh batteries and cycled batteries were compared using the aforementioned methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!