The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using nanolc ultra system

1

Quantitative Proteomics of POLD3 Interactome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
500 μg of nuclear extracts from B cells were immunoprecipitated with Protein-G Dynabeads that were previously coated with an anti-POLD3 antibody (Sigma). Proteins were eluted in 8M urea in 0.1M triethylammonium bicarbonate, and digested with trypsin for subsequent analyses. Proteomics was performed by NanoLC-MS/MS using an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a nanoLC Ultra system (Eksigent), equipped with a nanoelecroespray ion source (Proxeon Biosystems). Raw data was processed using Proteome Discoverer 1.4 (Thermo) and filtered for frequent contaminants.
See the Supplemental Information for a full list of antibodies, as well as other methods used in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Peptide Separation and Quantification using iTRAQ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eksigent NanoLC-Ultra system coupled with cHiPLC-Nanoflex system was applied to separate peptides labelled with different iTRAQ reagents. Peptides were separated by a gradient formed by mobile phase A (2% ACN, 0.1% FA) and mobile phase B (98% ACN, 2% H20, and 0.05% FA) from 12–40% of mobile phase B in 90 min, at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The MS analysis was conducted on a TripleTOF 5600 analyzer (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA). The MS spectra were collected across the mass range of 350–1250 m/z, using 250 ms accumulation time per spectrum. For each mass-spectrometry spectrum, a maximum of 20 precursors with a charge state between 2 and 4 were chosen for fragmentation. Also, the signals were accumulated for 100 ms per spectrum and dynamic exclusion time was set at 15 s. MS/MS spectra were measured in high sensitivity mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteome Changes After Quercetin Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The iTRAQ labeling method was applied to investigate the proteome changes after quercetin treatment for 12 h according to manufacturer’s instructions and as described previously (Wang et al., 2016 (link)). Briefly, after protein digestion, the peptides were labeled with four respective isobaric tags for 2 h and then pooled together. The contaminants were removed by an iTRAQ Method Development Kit (SCIEX, 4352160) using the strong cation exchange chromatography technique. Dried samples were reconstituted with diluent of 2% acetonitrile and 0.05% formic acid. After using an Eksigent NanoLCUltra system coupled to the cHiPLCNanoflex system (Eksigent, United States), the iTRAQ labeled peptides were detected by MS/MS with a TripleTOF 5600 system (SCIEX) set and identified by the Paragon algorithm with Protein Pilot TM Software 4.5 (SCIEX).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Identification in Brain Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proteins identified in IMS were actually detected in the data of three brain tumor samples by LC/MS, and included in the higher coverage (%) (>5.0) group (Supplementary Table S24. The LC/MS measurement method at that time is shown below this section32 (link). Samples were homogenized and suspended in 20 μL of 0.1 M NH4HCO3, containing 30% (v/v) CH3CN. After centrifuge, incubation, and cooling, samples were incubated in trypsin solution at 37 °C overnight. We added 10 mM DTT, and heated the digests at 95 °C for 5 min. After drying, we re-suspended them in 0.1% TFA containing 2% CH3CN. The samples were separated, using a nano-flow reverse-phase LC (NanoLC-Ultra System; Eksigent, Dublin, CA). We injected an aliquot of 5 μL of each sample into a trap column, and washed it for 10 min, using 0.1% formic acid. Peptides were eluted for further analyses, using Triple TOF 5600 system (AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA) with a nano-electrospray ionization source (NanoSpray; AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA). We performed MS/MS scans, using a collision energy of 35 kV with unit-resolution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Biotinylated RNA Pulldown and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biotinylated RNA pulldown was performed as in (Hacisuleyman et al., 2014 ). Selected SDS PAGE-separated bands were excised and in-gel digested with trypsin as in (Jiménez et al., 2001 ). LC-MS analyses of tryptic peptides utilized LTQ Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a NanoLC Ultra System (Eksigent), as described (Roan et al., 2014 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Identification of V5-Tagged Protein Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sixty millions of NoORF and GCNT3 SW620 cells (2 replicates) were lysed and 5 mg of total protein were incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with 200 µl protein A beads (Roche, Basel Switzerland) as a pre-clear step. Pre-cleared lysates were incubated overnight at 4 °C with 2 µg of anti V5 antibody followed by 2 h incubation with 100 µl of protein A beads. After incubation, beads were washed and transferred to Proteomic Core Unit of the Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO) for analysis. Peptides were analyzed by LC-MS/MS, Impact (Bruker Daltonics) coupled online to a nanoLC Ultra system (Eksigent), equipped with nanoelectrospray ion source supplemented with a CaptiveSpray nanoBooster operated at 0.2 bar/minute with isopropanol as dopant. For protein identification and quantification raw data were analyzed by MaxQuant (1.5.1.2) using a Human Uniprot Canonical database plus the most common contaminants (20584 entries in total).
We used STRING (http://string-db.org/) to illustrate protein-protein interaction networks. Functional analysis of Gene Ontology (GO) terms and protein set enrichment analysis were carried out using the GeneCodis3 tool46 (link)–48 (link). REViGO tool was used to summarize Gene Ontology terms by removing redundant GO terms49 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Sensitive Nanoscale Proteomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fractions prepared in the previous step were analyzed with nanoHPLC-MS/MS. The NanoLC-Ultra system (Eksigent, Dublin, CA) was used coupled to an Orbitrap Velos hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo-Finnigan, San Jose, CA). The separation was performed on a tip column packed with Magic RP C18 AQ, 200A, 3 μm beads (Bischoff GmbH, Leonberg, Germany), with the previously described gradient [16 (link)]. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent mode with the previously reported ion scanning parameters [16 (link)]. Fragmented peptide masses were set in dynamic exclusion for 60 s and singly charged ions were excluded from MS/MS analysis. To improve sensitivity of the MS/MS analysis for peptides of low-abundance proteins, each fraction was run a second time excluding previously fragmented precursors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cardiac Protein Extraction and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cardiac proteins were analysed using our previously described method16 (link). Briefly, samples were homogenized and suspended in 20 μL of 0.1 M NH4HCO3 that contained 30% (v/v) CH3CN, and then centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 1 min. Samples were incubated at 95 °C for 90 min, centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 1 min, and cooled on ice. Next, 1 μL of 1 μg/μL trypsin solution was added. Samples were incubated at 37 °C overnight. The next day, 10 mM DTT was added and the digests were heated at 95 °C for 5 min, dried, and re-suspended in 0.1% TFA containing 2% CH3CN to obtain a final protein concentration of 0.2 μg/μL. Samples were separated using a nano-flow reverse-phase LC (NanoLC-Ultra System; Eksigent, Dublin, CA). An aliquot of each sample (5 μL) was injected into a trap column and washed for 10 min using 0.1% formic acid. Peptides were eluted for further analyses using a quadrupole time-of-flight hybrid mass spectrometer (Triple TOF 5600 system; AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA), equipped with a nano-electrospray ionization source (NanoSpray; AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA). Tandem MS (MS/MS) scans were performed using a collision energy of 35 kV with unit-resolution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Extraction and Analysis of Metabolic Proteins from Whole Grains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolic proteins were extracted from whole grains as described in Bonnot et al. (2017) (link). Briefly, proteins were extracted for 2 h at 4°C in 10 mM sodium phosphate, 10 mM NaCl, pH 7.8, supplemented with a cocktail of plant protease inhibitors (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, United States). After centrifugation at 8,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C, proteins in the supernatant were precipitated with ice-cold acetone for 2 h at -20°C. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C, the resulting pellets were washed three times in ice-cold acetone then dried at room temperature and afterward stored at -20°C. The precipitated AG proteins were suspended in a solubilization buffer (0.1% ZALS I, 6 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 10 mM DTT, 30 mM Tris–Hcl pH 8.8, 50 mM NH4HCO3). Proteins were digested in-solution by trypsin and resulting peptides were analyzed by LC-MS/MS using a nanoLC Ultra system (Eksigent) and a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Sensitive LC-MS/MS Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS experiments were performed using a TripleTOF 5600 System (SCIEX, Canada) and a NanoLC Ultra System (Eksigent, USA), equipped with a trap column (150 μm i.d. × 1 cm long; PGC, 5 μm; Proteomics Front, China) and a separation column (75 μm i.d. × 10 cm long; PGC, 5 μm; Proteomics Front, China). MS was operated in the positive-ion mode with a mass range of 500–3000 m/z, and MS/MS was acquired in the information dependent acquisition (IDA) mode with a mass range of 100–2000 m/z. The 20 most abundant precursor ions with charge numbers from 2 to 5 were scanned in the IDA mode. Each cycle consisted of a MS acquisition for 0.25 s and a total of 20 MS/MS scans for 2 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!