The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

60 protocols using origin v8

1

Mitochondrial Function in Trained Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The results are presented as the means ± SD obtained from at least six independent muscle homogenate preparations or mitochondrial isolations, in which each determination was performed at least in duplicate. ANOVA followed by a post hoc Tukey’s test for pairwise comparisons was used to identify significant differences. Differences were considered to be statistically significant if p < 0.05 (* or #), p < 0.01 (** or ##), or p < 0.001 (*** or ###). #, ##, and ### indicate comparison between different temperatures within a given group of animals, i.e., within control rats or trained rats. *, **, and *** indicate comparison of data obtained between trained rats vs. control rats. Statistical analysis was performed with Origin v 8.5.1 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The means ± SD obtained from at least 3–6 independent homogenate preparations or mitochondrial isolations are presented. Each determination was performed at least in duplicate. Significant differences were determined via unpaired t tests or ANOVAs (followed by Tukey’s post hoc comparisons for p < 0.05 from an ANOVA). Differences were considered to be statistically significant if p < 0.05 (* or #), p < 0.01 (** or ##), or p < 0.001 (*** or ###). Statistical analysis was performed with Origin v 8.5.1 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Repeated Measures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data statistical and graphical analysis was carried out using Origin V.8 (OriginLab Corporation, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software, USA).
Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. Since data represent repeated measurements within each study condition and are normally distributed, statistical comparisons between multiple groups were performed using the “Repeated Measure ANOVA” (RA) test, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. For all tests, differences with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Kinetic Analysis of Glucose Oxidase Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The kinetic parameters of each GOx variant were determined using triplicate ABTS assays in microtiter plates with different glucose concentrations (1.2–266 mM) at pH 5.5 and 7.4. To determine the Km and kcat values, the slope of each measurement was calculated over the linear region and fitted to a Michaelis-Menten hyperbola using Origin v8 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA). Lineweaver-Burk, Eadie-Hofstee and Hanes-Woolf plots were also constructed, and the outliers were identified and removed. Protein concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm (the absorption of 1.5 mg/mL GOx is considered equivalent to 1 AU based on the sequence, as calculated using ProtParam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Nanoparticle Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All DLS, ζ-potential, and plating (cell enumeration) experiments were replicated three times in identical fashion over differing days (N= 3). Additionally, SEM imaging was completed for three identically prepared independent sets of samples over three differing dates. Statistical analysis of data was completed using ORIGIN® v.8 software (OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA, USA). All microbiological data were log10-transformed prior to statistical analysis. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s Honestly Significant Differences (HSD) post hoc test was used to determine significant differences in data between the treatments at a significance level of P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Kinetic Analysis of rcasIL-10R1 Binding to IL-4 and IL-10

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified rcasIL-10R1 was immobilized on a CM5 chip (General Electrics, Uppsala, Sweden) in a Biacore T100 analyzer (General Electrics) in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Briefly, 800 μL of rcasIL-10R1 (0.5 μg/mL) was applied (50 μL/minute) to a chip matrix activated by 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC)/N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) to achieve 1000 resonance response units (RU). The remaining reactive chemical groups on the chip were blocked by applying Ethanolamine hydrochloride-NaOH for one minute. Next, the following samples were applied to the matrix for two minutes and 30 seconds: a) phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.05% Tween 20; b) canine IL-4 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) at 125, 250 or 500 ng/mL; c) canine IL-10 (R&D Systems) at 31.2, 62.5, 125, 250 or 500 ng/ml. IL-4 and IL-10 were diluted with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20. After each analyte binding evaluation, matrix regeneration was performed by applying regeneration buffer for 30 seconds. Each sample was evaluated twice and results are presented as means and standard deviations (X±SD) of RU. Kinetics of association (Kon) and dissociation (Koff), as well as affinity of rcasIL-10R1 to IL-10, were calculated from RU measurements using Origin v.8.5 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multivariate Analysis of Plant Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the data including growth parameters were statistically analyzed using SAS. For N availability data at the different growth stages, separation of means was subjected to Tukey’s honestly significant difference test using JMP 9.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States). The graphing was done using Origin v.8.5 software (Originlab Corporation, Northampton, United States). Correlation analysis was conducted to identify relationships between the measured parameters. All tests were performed at the 0.05 significance level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were processed with Origin v8.5 software (Origin Lab Corp., Northampton, MA, USA). T-tests and ANOVA tests were performed using the SPSS 19.0 software package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Significant differences between the samples were identified by Tukey’s test, with a confidence level of 95 % (P < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying HIV-1 Neutralization Potency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The neutralization EC50 values of gp120 protein ligands were used as the starting concentrations for measuring inhibition of virolysis.6 (link),29 (link) Serial dilutions of 2G12 antibody starting at 1 mg mL−1, 1 μM cyanovirin, or 100 μg/mL 697-30D antibody were incubated with the EC80 concentration of peptide, namely, 10 μM for 1, 14 μM for 2, and 50 μM for 8. The peptide and protein were added to a 1:4 working dilution of the purified pseudotyped HIV-1BaL virions for 30 min at 37 °C. The soluble fraction was separated, and the extent of p24 release was determined by the same protocol as the sandwich ELISA protocol described above. Virus in PBS was the negative control, while virus in 1% Triton-X 100 was the positive control. Quantified values from triplicate assays were plotted as a function of p24 released compared with the positive control. These values were fit using Origin v.8.1 (OriginLab, Northampton, USA) to determine EC50 values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Proteomics Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For proteins that exhibited changes in concentration as revealed by label free quantitative proteomics, intensity values were pooled with Bio-Plex™ protein concentration data. The protein concentration data were mean centred and autoscaled prior subjection to principal component analysis using the pcamethods script (http://www.bioconductor.org) in R (http://www.R-project.org). For all individual protein species, ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey posthoc analysis (origin v.8.1, originlab, Northampton, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!