The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

50 protocols using uhplc system

1

Quantification of Neutrophil and Plasma Ascorbate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For neutrophil ascorbate measurement, 10 μl of the extraction solvent (80% methanol containing 10 mM EDTA and 50 pmoles 13C-ascorbate/200,000 cells as an internal standard) was added to 10 µL neutrophil extract, vortexed for 10”, centrifuged at 21,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was diluted using 30 µL of 0.03% formic acid in water and analyzed using an AB Sciex 6500+ QTrap mass spectrometer coupled to a Shimadzu UHPLC system operating in negative mode to detect the transitions 175/115 (ascorbate) and 176/116 (13C-ascorbate). LC conditions were as previously described112 (link). For plasma ascorbate measurement, the extraction solvent was 80% methanol with 5 mM EDTA and 5 μM 13C-ascorbate as an internal standard. 10 µL plasma were mixed with 40 µL chilled extraction solvent, vortexed for 30”, centrifuged at 21,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C and supernatant was transferred into a new tube. Ten microliters of the extract was then mixed with 20 µL of 5 mM EDTA in water, centrifuged at 21,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C and transferred to LC-MS autosampler vials. Ascorbate measurements for plasma were performed in the same way as for neutrophil samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS Analysis of Tea Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical composition of the extracts was deciphered using an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system (Shimadzu, Japan) coupled to a quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometer (Q-TOF/MS, X500, Toronto, Canada). Chromatographic separation of the tea extract was done using an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm; Waters, Manchester, UK). Water with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid and acetonitrile were used as mobile phase A and B, respectively, for chromatographic elution. The elution program was performed from 0–7 min with a linear increase in phase B from 8% to 25%, followed by a linear increase to 98% at 9.5 min and maintained for 1 min. Phase B was adjusted to 8% at 10.6 min for re-equilibration and maintained for 3.6 min. The flow rate was set at 0.30 mL/min. The injection volume was 3 μL. Electrospray ionization (ESI) was performed in negative ionization mode. The mass reading range was set at 100–1,000 m/z. The data is transformed into a peak table by msdial software [15 (link)], and then calculated through the server (http://metdna.zhulab.cn/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Biosensor Validation via UHPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Validation of the developed biosensor was done by using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC). UHPLC system (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) equipped with column: Shim-pack XR-ODS III (100 × 2 mm, 2.2 μm particle size), column temperature 40°C, flow rate 0.3 ml/min, injection volume 5 μl was used. Mobile Phase ACN/MeOH/THF (40 : 40: 20 v/v/v) with the injection volume was 40 μl, and samples were eluted at a flow rate of 1 ml/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Endocannabinoids in Serum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AEA, 2-AG, AA, OEA, and PEA were extracted, purified, and quantified in serum by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as previously described [22 (link),23 (link),24 (link)]. LC-MS/MS analyses were conducted on a Sciex (Framingham, MA, USA) QTRAP® 6500+ mass spectrometer coupled with a Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) UHPLC system. Liquid chromatographic separation was obtained using 5 μL injections of samples onto a Kinetex 2.6 μm C18 (100 × 2.1 mm) column from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA). The autosampler was set at 4 °C, and the column was maintained at 40 °C during the entire analysis. Endocannabinoids were detected in positive ion mode using electron spray ionization (ESI) and a multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode of acquisition, using d4-AEA as internal standard (IS). The IonDriveTM Turbo V source temperature was set at 450 °C with an ion spray voltage of 4000 V. The curtain gas was set at 30.0 psi. The nebulizer gas (Gas 1) was set to 40 psi, and the turbo heater gas (Gas 2) was set to 40 psi. The dwell time was set to 30 ms. The collision energy (CE), declustering potential (DP), and collision cell exit potential (CXP) for the monitored transitions are listed in Table 1. The LC-MS/MS chromatogram is presented in Figure 1. The serum levels of AEA, 2-AG, OEA, PEA, and AA were measured in duplicate against standard curves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Intracellular SAM in S. xinghaiensis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular SAM concentrations of S. xinghaiensis strains were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Fermentation cultures (1.0 mL) were harvested 96 h after inoculation, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and intracellular SAM was extracted using 1.0 mL of 1.0 M formic acid at 4 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, the supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C and passed through 0.22-μm filters.
The supernatant was used for the determination of intracellular SAM concentrations with a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) column using an UHPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan) and triple quadrupole 5500 mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, USA). The mobile phase consisted of water with 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (solvent B). Samples (1.0 μL) were analyzed at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min with the following gradient: 0.5−3.0−4.0−5.0−7.0−7.1−9.0 min, 1.0%–1.0%−30%–100%−100%–1.0%−1.0% B. SAM was detected in a multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with m/z parent > m/z daughter (399 > 298). Pure samples of SAM purchased from New England Biolabs were used as standards. Data were acquired and processed using Analyst 1.6.3 (AB Sciex, USA). Three biological replicates were used in the experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Serum Analysis of MPS and MP Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the levels of MPS and MP after infusion at each blood collection time, sera were prepared and analyzed in duplicate. To 100 µL of serum, 30 ng (10 μL of a methanolic solution at 30 µg/mL) of the internal standard hydrocortisone succinate (HC) and budesonide (BUD) were added before each analysis. Afterwards, samples were extracted with 6 mL of ethyl acetate, evaporate to dryness with filtrated air at 30 °C using Eppendorf Concentrator 5301 (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) and re-dissolved in 100 μL methanol. The chromatography was performed under reverse phase conditions using a Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) UHPLC System as described in more details in the Supplementary materials. Results are presented as the mean ± STDEV. The large number of data points allowed for a detailed data analysis and NCAanalysis using Phoenix ® WinNonlin ® www.certara.com (Certa USA, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Mycotoxins DON and ZEA in Maize

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following the incubation period, 25 g maize grains were collected from the test samples and ground to a fine powder under aseptic conditions and suspended in 250 mL solution of acetonitrile and water (v/v, 6:4). The blend was mixed for 15 min at 140–160 rpm and the supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was subjected to clean-up with immunoaffinity columns of DON and ZEA in according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Vicam, Waters business, USA). The quantification DON and ZEA were done as per our previous reported methodology (Mudili et al., 2014 (link); Kalagatur et al., 2015 (link)) using UHPLC system (Nexera, Shimadzu, Japan). The quantification of DON and ZEA was deducted from their respective standard calibration curve and concentration was expressed in μg/g.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

UHPLC Separation of Biomolecules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic analysis was performed using a UHPLC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) consisting of an LC-30AD binary pump, an autosampler (Model SIL-30SD), an online degasser (DGU-20A5R), and a temperature controller for columns (CTO-30A). Separation was carried out on an extended C18 Column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.8 μm; Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 30 °C and the flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. The optimal mobile phase consisted of A (HCOOH/H2O, 0.1:100, v/v) and B (C2H3N). The optimized UHPLC elution conditions were as follows 0–2 min, 3–15% B; 2–7 min, 15–20% B;7–8 min, 20% B; 8–9 min, 20–30% B; 9–13 min, 30–32% B; 13–21 min; 32–54% B; 21–23 min, 54–100% B; 23–27 min, 100–3% B; and 27–28 min, 3% B. The injection volume was 2 μL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of BRP2 in Buffalo Ricotta

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synthesis of the analogue peptide was performed according to the solid phase approach using standard Fmoc methodology, with a Biotage Initiator+Alstra (Uppsala, Sweden) automated microwave synthesizer (for detailed conditions, see Supporting Information ).
The quantification of BRP2 in buffalo ricotta digesta and BRF2 was performed on a Nexera UHPLC system coupled online to an LCMS-8050 mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), equipped with an ESI source operated in positive mode. MS/MS analysis was conducted in selected reaction monitoring (SRM), employing the synthetic peptide as an external standard. Stock solution was prepared in water, the calibration curve was obtained in a concentration range of 0.1-125 μg L−1 with eight concentration levels, and triplicate injection of each level was run. Peak areas of BRP2 were plotted against the corresponding concentrations. Linear regression was used to generate the calibration curve (y = 0.0004x–1.5321) with R2 values being ≥0.9998 (see Supporting Information ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UHPLC–MS/MS system is composed of a Shimadzu UHPLC system equipped with a LC-30AD binary pump, an on-line degasser (DGU-20A5R), an autosampler (Model SIL-30SD), a column temperature controller compartment (CTO-30A), and a 5500 triple quadtandem mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, Concord, ON, USA) with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The separation of the analytes was achieved on a Waters BEH-C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!