The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss software 14

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS software 14.0 is a statistical analysis software package designed for data management, analysis, and reporting. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for conducting various statistical tests, modeling, and visualization. The software is widely used in academic, research, and business settings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

16 protocols using spss software 14

1

Predictors of Poor Sleep Quality

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistic was used for demographic data presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or percentage for each sub-group. Differences among groups were analyzed using the appropriate t-test for unpaired or paired data. Categorical variables were analyzed using χ2 test. Pearson correlation test was used when appropriate. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of poor sleep quality. P value was significant when < 0.05. Statistic was performed using SPSS software 14.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Treatment Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistics were analyzed in SPSS software 14.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, United States). Data are presented as the means ± SEM and the differences among the control and various treatment groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Two-tailed Student’s t-test was used as a post hoc test to assess differences between two groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Analysis of Neuronal Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are reported as the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was conducted with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Tukey post hoc test for multiple comparisons. Analyses were performed using the SPSS software 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biostatistical Analysis of Pediatric CKD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR). The Mann–Whitney U test or chi-square test was used to test the differences in variables between children with CKD stage G1 and those with CKD stage G2–G3. The associations between variables were examined using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software 14.0 (Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis of Experimental Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistics were analyzed with SPSS software 14.0 (SPSS, Inc.). All experiments were performed three times, and the data are presented as the mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test was used to assess multiple groups of data and the Student's t-test was used to compare two groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Exploring Nitric Oxide and Left Ventricular Mass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results are presented with the median (25th–75th percentile) or number (%). All statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software 14.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). The Mann–Whitney U-test or Chi-square test was used to test the differences in variables between the two groups. The associations between variables were examined using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. A linear regression model was performed, followed by the stepwise multivariable analyses integrating relevant parameters to explain NO-related parameters and LVMI. Differences were considered significant at a probability level of p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

CAKUT vs. Non-CAKUT Comparative Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were expressed as medians (25th, 75th percentile) for continuous variables while categorical variables were expressed as number (%). The Mann–Whitney U-test or Chi-square test was used to test the differences in variables between children with CAKUT and non-CAKUT. The associations between variables were examined using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Apolipoprotein Levels and Cardiovascular Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are presented as medians and inter-quartile ranges (IQRs; 25th−75th percentile), while categorical variables are described as numbers and percentages. The Mann–Whitney U-test or chi-square test was used to test the differences in variables between two groups. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the associations between variables. A linear regression model was performed, followed by stepwise multivariable analyses for integrating relevant parameters to explain apoC-II, apoC-III, and CV risk markers. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software 14.0 (Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ventricular Remodeling and Diastolic Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous data are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise specified. Statistical analysis was performed using a standard statistical software package (SPSS software 14.0, SPSS Inc.). A Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the significance of differences between the 2 groups. To assess the overall impact of VNS on LA volumes, LA function and LV diastolic function, we used a two-way repeated-measures analysis of covariance with group as a fixed factor, animal number as random factor, and time as a covariate. We tested the effects of groups as a factor, time after HF development as a covariate, as well as time × group interactions. Parameter estimates were used to assess significance of parameter change over time in individual groups. To eliminate the impact of non-normal distribution and the presence of outliers, we also correlated pericardial thickness and strain using Spearman Rho (ρ) coefficient. To assess the intra- and inter-observer variability of the three components of LA strain, six randomly selected data sets were evaluated by 2 independent observers, with each observer measuring the same data set twice. We then calculated the intra- and inter-observer standard error of measurement (SEM) using the method of Eliasziw et al.15 (link) Statistical significance was defined by p<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microcurrent Stimulation's Effect on RMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To estimate the sample size, we conducted a pilot trial as no previous studies could provide guidance regarding population size and power. In the trial, 9 volunteers underwent the HGS and the EMG test for evaluating RMS value before and after microcurrent stimulation. Among the outcomes, the RMS value was selected to estimate the number of subjects. To detect this difference in a randomized controlled trial using a paired t test assuming a 5% 2-tailed significant level (an alpha of 0.05), a power of 90%, and a 20% dropout rate, the suggested sample size was 18 subjects per group. With a slight increase in sample size, a total of 38 subjects (19 subjects in each group) participated in the present study. All demographic data are presented as the mean and standard deviation (SD), unless otherwise noted. Normality of distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparing the continuous variables and the χ2 test or Fisher exact test was utilized for comparing the categorical variables. Comparison between at baseline and after intervention data within each group was analyzed using a paired t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test. All variables with a P < .05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software 14.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) was used to conduct data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!