The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss for windows version 9

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS for Windows version 9.0 is a comprehensive software package for statistical analysis. It provides a wide range of statistical procedures for data management, analysis, and presentation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

7 protocols using spss for windows version 9

1

Assessing Visual Acuity and IOP Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows version 9.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A paired Student's t-test was used to make statistical comparisons between preoperative and postoperative LogMAR visual acuity and IOP. A P value < 0.05 was considered as significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Balance Assessment in Spinal Cord Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optimal sensory conditions for balance assessment were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), with vision and support base as the main factors. Further, Pearson correlation between HD and clinical scales was analyzed to determine the influences of HD on balance in SCI subjects.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (version 9.0, Chicago, IL). Data were considered significant at p < 0.05. Correlation analyses were performed per Munro’s classification [30 ]: 0.00–0.25: little, if any correlation; 0.26–0.49: low correlation; 0.50–0.69: moderate correlation; 0.70–0.89: high correlation; and 0.90–1.00: very high correlation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Biomedical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normality of distribution is statistically tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The average values of continuous variables are expressed by median and interquartile range. Nominal indicators are shown by an absolute and relative number. Differences between categorical variables are tested by χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test. To determine the differences between two independent groups we used the Mann-Whitney test, and in the case of three or more independent groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test. The evaluation of association is expressed by Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficient. To assess the importance of given results, we determined α = 0.05 as a level of importance. We used the SPSS for Windows (version 9.0, Carry, NY, USA) for all statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phyllodes Tumor Marker Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Chi-square test was used to determine differences in CD10, VEGF, and factor 8 expression between benign, borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine the level of significance of markers (VEGF, CD10, and factor 8) between the groups (benign, borderline, and malignant). Chi-square test was used to calculate the P value. Statistical significance was established at P < 0.05.
The test used for calculating the correlation coefficient was Pearson's coefficient correlation test. Data were collected, coded, and analyzed by SPSS for Windows Version 9.0 (Chicago, SPSS Inc) under Microsoft Windows XP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Diagnostic Accuracy of Radiologic Imaging Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated by use of standard statistical formulae.
True-positive was any radiologically suspected malignant lesion, confirmed at histological examination. False-positive was any radiologically suspected malignant lesion, resulting as benign at histological examination. False-negative was lesion identified intraoperatively and/or recognised as malignant at histological examination. True-negatives were hepatic benign lesions that had to be resected because of their proximity to malignant lesions, yet whose benignity was confirmed by histological examination. As a rational decision was taken not to resect all benign liver lesions if not needed, the true-negatives in this series are underestimated.
In order to verify any differences in the detection of LM capability among the five RITs, we used the nonparametric Cochran Q-test. Whenever the Cochran Q-test found statistical significance, the McNemar test was applied so as to test the statistical significance of differences in performance between techniques pairwise. For the comparison between independent groups, the χ2-test was used.
All tests were two-sided and were carried out to a 5% level of significance, using software SPSS for Windows, version 9.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Research Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows version 9.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). The main outcome measures were expressed as mean (±standard deviation). Comparison of means was performed by paired Student's t-test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparative Analysis of Means

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed using SPSS for windows version 9.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). The main outcome measures were expressed as mean (!standard deviation). Comparison of means was performed by the paired Student t-test. A P-value !0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!