The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using hplc cartridge

1

HPLC Analysis of Pharmaceuticals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CIPRO, LEVO, TX-114, triethylamine (TEA), sodium monophosphate, and orthophosphoric acid were purchased by Sigma Aldrich (Steiheim, Germany). MOXI was purchased by Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). Acetonitrile (ACN), methanol (MeOH), and potassium chloride were purchased by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All reagents were HPLC-grade. Sodium chloride, sodium hydroxide, boric acid, and acetic acid were purchased by Avantor Performance Materials (Gliwice, Poland). The HPLC analysis was done on LiChroCART® 250-4, HPLC-Cartridge, and LiChrospher® 100 RP-18 (5 μm) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with a LiChroCART® guard column (4-4, LiChrospher® 100 RP-18 (5 μm)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC Fingerprint Analysis of AZC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fingerprint chromatogram of AZC was established through high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) employing a Waters® system equipped with a Waters® 2998 photodiode array detector. Separation was achieved using Purospher® STAR, C-18 encapped (5µM), LiChro-CART® 250 − 4.6, and HPLC-Cartridge, Sorbet Lot No. HX255346 (Merck, Germany).
In this study, the mobile phase gradient comprised 100% methanol (solvent A) (Fisher Scientific, USA) and 2.5% acetic acid (solvent B) (Fisher Scientific, USA) in deionized (DI) water. The gradient elution was conducted at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, with the following gradient profile: 0–17 min, 70% A; 18–20 min, 100% A; 20.5–25 min, 10% A. Before administration, the sample underwent filtration (0.45 μm, Millipore), and a 20 µL aliquot of the sample was directly utilized. The chromatogram was assessed at 280 nm using a UV detector, and data analysis was carried out employing EmpowerTM3 [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fingerprint Analysis of PMG using HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fingerprint chromatogram of PMG was determined by using the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Chromatography was performed by using a Waters® system equipped with a Waters® 2998 photodiode array detector. The separation of chromatogram was performed using Purospher® STAR, C-18 encapped (5 μm), LiChroCART® 250-4.6, and HPLC-Cartridge, Sorbet Lot No. HX255346 (Merck, Germany). According to this study, 100% methanol (solvent A) (Fisher Scientific, USA) and 2.5% acetic acid (solvent B) (Fisher Scientific, USA) in deionized (DI) water were used to produce the gradient of mobile phase. The gradient elution of mobile phase was carried out at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min with the following gradient: 0-17 min, 70% A, 18-20 min, 100% A; 20.5-25 min, 10% A. The sample was filtered (0.45 μm, Millipore) and an aliquot of sample at the volume of 20 μl was directly administered. The chromatogram assessment was performed at 280 nm using a UV detector, and data analysis was performed using EmpowerTM3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Separation of Leaf Phenolics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual phenolic compounds of leaf extracts were separated by a reverse-phase column Licrosphere 100 RP-18 (5 µm particle size) packed with LiChroCART 250-4 (25 × 0.4 cm ID) HPLC-Cartridge (Merck KGaA, Germany) with a guard column (LiChroCART 4-4); the column was thermostated at 25 ˚C. Solvent A was phosphoric acid 10 -3 M and solvent B was pure methanol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Total Phenolic Compounds and Phytochemical Profiling of T. triandra Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total phenolic compounds content was determined with the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Gallic acid was used as a standard and the total phenolics were expressed as mg/g gallic acid equivalents (GAE) [16 ].
The finger print of T. triandra leaves extract was carried out by using gradient high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system. The system consists of 515 HPLC pump and 2998 Photodiode array detector of Waters company, USA. Chromatographic separation was performed using Purospher STAR, C-18 encapped (5 μm), LiChroCART 250-4.6, and HPLC-Cartridge, Sorbet Lot number HX255346 (Merk, Germany). Two mobile phases consisting of methanol and 2.5% acetic acid in deionized (DI) water were used to induce gradient elution. The injection volume was 20 μL and the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. During HPLC analysis the solvent gradient was programmed as shown in Table 1 and data analysis was performed using Empower 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of Developed Drink

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fingerprint chromatogram of the developed drink was analyzed by using gradient high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system consisted of 515 HPLC pump and 2998 photodiode array detector (Water Company, USA). Chromatographic separation was performed using Purospher®STAR, C-18 endcapped (5 μm), LiChroCART®250-4.6, and HPLC-Cartridge, sorbet lot number HX255346 (Merk, Germany) with guard column (Merk, Germany). Methanol (A) and 7.5% acetic acid in deionized (DI) water (B) were used as mobile phases. The gradient elution was carried out at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min with the following gradient: 0–17 min, 70%A; 18–22 min, 100%A; 23–25, 50%A; and 26–30 min, 60%A. The sample was filtered (0.45 μm, Millipore), and a direct injection of tested sample at the volume of 20 μl on the column was performed. The chromatograms were recorded at 280 nm using a UV detector and data analysis was performed using EmpowerTM3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenolic Profile Analysis of Mulberry Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenolic profiles of mulberry extract and encapsulated mulberry extract consisting of cyanidin-3-glucoside (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), gallic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Chromatography was performed by using a Waters® system equipped with a Waters 2998 photodiode array detector. Chromatographic separation was performed using Purospher® STAR, C-18 encapped (5 μm), LiChroCART® 250-4.6, and HPLC-Cartridge, Sorbet Lot number HX255346 (Merk, Germany). The mobile phase (HPLC grade) consisted of 100% methanol (solvent A) (Fisher Scientific, USA) and 2.5% acetic acid (solvent B) (Fisher Scientific, USA) in deionized (DI) water was used to induce gradient elution. The gradient elution was carried out at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min with the following gradient: 0–17 min, 70% A; 18–20 min, 100% A; and 20.5–25 min, 10% A. The sample was filtered (0.45 μm, Millipore), and a direct injection of tested sample at the volume of 20 μl on the column was performed. The chromatograms were recorded at 280 nm using UV detector, and data analysis was performed using EmpowerTM3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!