The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3t signa pet mr scanner

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The 3T Signa PET/MR scanner is a hybrid medical imaging device that combines positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technologies. It enables simultaneous acquisition of both PET and MRI data, providing comprehensive information about the structure and function of the examined body part.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using 3t signa pet mr scanner

1

Multimodal MRI Registration for Brain Edema Delineation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The T1 (TR = 8 m s , TE = 2.9   m s , TI = 950 m s , FA = 8°) and T2-FLAIR (TR = 4800 m s , TE = 320 m s , TI = 1650 m s ) MR images routinely acquired at diagnosis time on a 3T Achieva scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands)—referred to as the ‘in vivo’ images hereafter—were retrospectively used in this work for registration guidance and delineation of the vasogenic edema.
Additionally, a T1 BRAVO ‘ex vivo’ acquisition (TR = 8.264   m s , TE = 3.164   m s , TI = 450 m s , FA = 12°) of the brain placed inside the 3D-printed slicer (see below) was performed on a 3T Signa PET/MR scanner (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) right before slicing. It should, however, be noted that brain fixation has caused convergence of the T1 values of white and gray matter, as reported in [17 (link),18 (link)]. Consequently, the acquired ex vivo T1 image rather has a proton-density (PD) contrast. Furthermore, note that drainage of the extracellular fluid made it impossible to delineate edema regions on postmortem T2-FLAIR images, motivating the use of a registered antemortem T2-FLAIR image for edema delineation hereafter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Imaging of Sinonasal Pathologies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FDG‐PET/CT was acquired using a Discovery VCT scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI), a Discovery 690 Standard scanner (GE Healthcare), a Discovery MI scanner (GE Healthcare), a Discovery ST scanner (GE Healthcare), or a Discovery LS scanner (GE Healthcare). FDG‐PET/MRI was performed using a 3T SIGNA PET/MR scanner (GE Healthcare). A standardized dose of 3.5 MBq of FDG per kg body weight (PET/CT) or 3.0 MBq per kg body weight (PET/MRI) was injected, from 2017 on. BMI‐adapted body weight‐dependent dosage protocols were used.22 For attenuation correction in PET/MRI, standard Dixon‐based maps were used. Computed tomography (CT) consisted of a standardized protocol of high‐resolution axial volume acquisition (0.6–1.0 mm) with reconstructions in coronal and sagittal planes in bone and soft tissue kernel, with and without contrast‐enhancement. For the sinonasal/neck MRI dedicated regionalized T2‐weighted and T1‐weighted MR pulse sequences with and without gadolinium‐based contrast agent were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Dopamine D2/3 Receptor and Fear Conditioning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eighteen individuals (mean ± SD age 25.2 ± 4.8 years; 10 women, 8 men; 16 right-handed, 2 left-handed) recruited through local advertisements were included in the study, which was approved by the regional ethics review board and radiation safety committee in Uppsala, Sweden. Participants arrived at the scanning site about 2 h before scanning. They were informed about the study and signed informed consent. Approximately 90 min prior to radiotracer injection and PET scanning, participants determined the strength of the unconditioned electric shock through a staircase procedure with the instruction that the shock should be unpleasant, but endurable.
Participants were positioned supine in the combined Signa 3T PET/MR scanner (GE Healthcare) with their heads lightly fixated inside the head coil. A bolus (20 s) of the selective dopamine D2/3 receptor antagonist [11C]raclopride was injected through a venous catheter and followed by constant infusion during the 90 min of PET data acquisition. Following 50 min of resting PET data collection, participants underwent a differential fear conditioning paradigm during collection of blood-oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) fMRI and skin conductance. The PET scanning continued 20 min after the fear conditioning paradigm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Deuterated Glucose Imaging in CNS Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five normal control volunteers (two male, three female, age 27.6 ± 2.0) and three patients (two male, one female, age 56.3 ± 8.4) with varying CNS lesions were recruited and scanned under IRB approval. Of the normal controls, four were scanned for the purposes of SNR comparison experiments described in Section 3.1.3 (two with 2H-Glc ingestion and two without). The normal control was scanned using the same DMI Protocol for Clinical Subjects as the three patients for clinical comparisons. Of the three patients, two had diseases which were considered well-managed at the time of imaging—one with an anaplastic oligodendroglioma, Grade III but without evidence of active disease (Patient A), and the second with a glioblastoma stable on an anti-VEGF drug for several months (Patient B). The third patient had an anaplastic cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma behaving relatively aggressively (Patient C). All clinical subject information is summarized in Table 1.
Clinical subjects were scanned on a GE Signa 3T PET/MR scanner using a modified gradient filter (described in Section 2.1) and 2H volume RF coil (coil A in Section 2.2) approximately 45 min following the oral ingestion of 60 g of deuterated glucose ([6,6’-2H2]Glc) as in Reference 37 using the pulse sequence described in Section 2.3 and the Imaging Protocol described in Algorithm 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!