The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

276 protocols using eugenol

1

Natural Compounds Screening Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eugenol, β-escin, curcumin, berberine hydrochloride, sclareol, capsaicin, parthenolide, ellagic acid, glutathione, L-ascorbic acid were from Sigma–Aldrich (United Kingdom); osthole and pterostilbene were from Stratech (United Kingdom) and mitoquinol from Cayman Chemical Company (United Kingdom); all other NPs were components of the Puretitre natural compound library from Caithness Biotechnologies (United Kingdom). All of the above except Eugenol (70% ethanol), glutathione, and L-ascorbic acid (dH2O) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma United Kingdom) and added to growth media from the following stock solutions prepared in those solvents: Eugenol, 500 mM; glutathione, 375 mM, L-ascorbic acid, 500 mM; osthole, 200 mM; pterostilbene, 200 mM; β-escin, 50 mM; curcumin, 50 mM; berberine hydrochloride, 200 mM; sclareol, 130 mM; capsaicin, 200 mM; parthenolide, 130 mM; ellagic acid, 33.3 mM, mitoquinol, 2.94 mM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electrochemical Monitoring of Nitric Oxide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
•NO generation in leaf tissues was monitored by constant potential amperometry with a NO-selective disc-type electrode34 (link),35 (link),37 (link)–40 (link). The electrode was prepared by electropolymerizing a poly-eugenol thin film on a cleaned Pt disc37 (link) and repeatedly scanning the potential between −0.2 and 0.6 V in a 10 mM solution of eugenol (Merck) in 0.1 M NaOH. The modified electrode was then conditioned at a constant potential of 0.9 V in a phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) until a stable background current was reached. Electrochemical monitoring of NO generation in leaf tissue extracts and cell suspensions was performed as described previously37 (link). The current was recalculated into concentration units based on a calibration curve (ISO-NO Mark II instruction manual, World Precision Instruments) constructed by measuring current responses to the addition of freshly prepared •NO aqueous solutions generated in situ from the reaction of iodide with nitrite in acid solution within the range of 0.3–100 μM (Extended Data Fig. 1g,h; ISO-NO Mark II instruction manual, World Precision Instruments)41 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antifungal MIC Determination of Eugenol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for eugenol (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) was determined by the antifungal microdilution susceptibility standard test proposed by the CLSI M27-A3 method (Institute Clinical and Laboratory Standards, 2008 ). The inoculum was prepared in sterile saline and the transmittance of the suspensions was adjusted to 75–77% (530 nm), followed by further dilution in RPMI-1640 buffered with MOPS (Sigma–Aldrich, St Louis, MO, United States) medium to achieve 1.0 × 103 to 5.0 × 103 CFU/mL. The final concentrations ranged from 2 to 1024 mg/L for eugenol. The plates were incubated at 35°C for 72 h. The MIC for eugenol was determined visually as 100% growth inhibition when compared to the control. The results were confirmed by adding the salt 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) (Sigma–Aldrich, St Louis, MO, United States) (5.0 mg/mL) to determine the reduction in the metabolic cell activity. Briefly, the plates were incubated at 35°C for 3 h and DMSO was added before spectrophotometric reading at 490 nm. The MIC endpoint for interpreting the results was 100% of reduction in metabolic activity for eugenol compared with the control. The isolate Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 was used as a quality control. All the tests were performed in duplicate for each strain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Synthesis of Allylated Catechol Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

m-Chloroperbenzoic acid (MCPBA), LiCl, tert-butylammonium fluoride (TBAF·3H2O), tert-butylammonium hydroxide (TBAH), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), iBu3Al solution (25% in toluene), eugenol, 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone (DMPA), t-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (TBDMSCl), thioglycolic acid, cysteamine and safrole were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. MePPh3Br and imidazole from Fluka, 1 M tert-butylammonium fluoride (TBAF) solution in THF from ChemCruz, and diphenylsilane and B(C6F5)3 from Alfa Aesar were used as received without any further purification. 4-Allylcatechol was prepared by reacting eugenol with LiCl in dimethyl formamide (DMF) as described.34 (link) Allyl glycidyl ether (AGE) from Sigma Aldrich was dried over CaH2 and distilled. Pb(AcO)4 was freshly prepared.35 Membrane (Spectra/Por) with a MWCO of 6000–8000 Daltons was purchased from Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Preparation and Storage of Reagents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DENA (#049K1613V), AAF (WZDQE-ED), eugenol (#STBH9243), and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) (I024086) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) and were preserved at 24 °C, except for eugenol and CMC, which were stored at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Eugenol-Loaded Micelles for Antimicrobial Applications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
eugenol-loaded micelles and other treatments (free eugenol, empty micelles, 200 ppm free chlorine, sterile distilled water) were prepared in identical manner to methods reported previously by our group [28 (link)]. Briefly, eugenol stock solution (70% w/v) was prepared by dissolution of eugenol (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) in 95% ethyl alcohol (Koptec, King of Prussia, PA, USA), and stored at 5 °C until ready for use. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles (1.0% w/v) were produced containing eugenol at 1.0% EOC according to previous methods [29 (link)]. After stirring until optical density at 632 nm stabilized, micelles were filter-sterilized by filtering through a 0.45 µm cellulose acetate filter. Micelles were then stored at 5 °C for no more than 36 h prior to use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Eugenol Preconditioning in Rat Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifty male SD rats were randomly divided into a sham group (n=10), a eugenol group (n=10 pairs, donor and recipient) and a control group (n=10 pairs, donor and recipient). The weight of 5 subgroups had no significantly statistical differences. The recipients of the eugenol group received an intraperitoneal injection of 20 mg/kg eugenol (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) for 15 days, and a corresponding volume of physiological saline was applied in the sham group and the control group for 15 days. Then, all rats were fasted for 12 h, and water was taken freely before the operation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Harpagophytum Procumbens Root Extract Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were left untreated (CTL) or treated, for the required time, as specified for each individual experiment, with 0.1 mg/mL of Harpagophytum procumbens root extract (HPE), provided by Ambiotec di Sergio Ammendola, and dissolved in DMSO (HPEDMSO). The concentration of 0.1 mg/mL was chosen based on the results obtained in our previous study [9 (link)].
In order to analyze the effect of single HPEDMSO components on synoviocytes, cells were treated for 24 h with β-caryophyllene (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA, sc-251281A; ≥98% purity), α-humulene (Merck Life Science cod. 53675; ≥96% purity), eugenol (Merck Life Science, cod. W246700; ≥98% purity) and harpagoside (Merck Life Science, cod. 68527; ≥95% purity), according to the levels detected by phytochemical analysis in 0.1 mg/mL HPEDMSO as described below. Moreover, we prepared a mixture containing all four components at concentrations determined in 0.1 mg/mL of HPEDMSO.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Evaluation of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5-fluorouracil (CAS no. 51–21-8) and penicillin G (CAS no. 69-57-8), purchased from Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, were dissolved in 1xPBS or DMEM. As for Phase II chemicals, eugenol (CAS no. 97-53-0) was purchased from Alfa Aesar; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Carnosic acid (CAS no. 3650-09-7) and procyanidin (CAS no. 4852-22-6) were purchased from Nanjing Zelang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China) and dioctyl phthalate (CAS no. 117-81-7) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA. eugenol, carnosic acid and dioctyl phthalate were solved in <0.5% ethanol. Procyanidin was dissolved in DMEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Synthesis of Substituted Phenols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4-Allyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenol (2), (S)-α-vinylbenzyl alcohol (3), and 4-allyl anisole (5) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). Eugenol (4) was purchased from Merck & Co., Inc. (Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA). Compounds 6, 7, and 8 were synthesized from 2, 3, and 4, respectively, by reacting with acetic anhydride (Scheme 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!