The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using odyssey fluorescence imaging system

1

Hippocampal and Cortical Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue from the hippocampus and whole cortex of the left hemisphere of the brain was homogenized in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer. Protein samples were run on 4%–20% TGX Gels (Bio-Rad), transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore), and blotted using standard protocols. Primary antibodies were the following: HDAC2 (Abcam; ab12169) ACTIN (Abcam; ab3280), and BDNF (Abcam; ab108319). Bands shown in western blot images for these proteins were at the expected sizes of 55, 42, and 15 kDa, respectively. Secondary antibodies were goat anti-mouse infrared (IR) 680 (LI-COR Biosciences; #926-68020), goat anti-mouse IR 800 (LI-COR Biosciences; #926-32210), and goat anti-rabbit IR 800 (LI-COR Biosciences; #925-32211). Membranes were imaged on the LI-COR Biosciences Odyssey fluorescence imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software). Details on statistical analysis and experimental design, including tests performed, exact p values, and sample sizes are provided in the result section describing each figure, or within the legend of each figure. For biochemistry experiment, subunit integrated density values (IDVs) were quantified on western blots by using the Quantity One or Odyssey fluorescence imaging system (Li-Cor). The fluorescence intensity values were quantified by using ImageJ. All data were expressed as mean ± S.E.M values. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), including one-way and two-way ANOVA, and unpaired Student t tests were used. Post hoc and a priori Bonferroni comparisons or Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison test were conducted to evaluate individual mean comparisons where appropriate. All analyses used an alpha level of 0.05 to determine statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell lysates were prepared as previously described [24] (link). The protein concentration was determined using Bio-Rad protein assay reagent. A total of 70 µg of proteins was resolved on 10% Bis–Tris gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The protein levels of target genes were detected using specific primary antibodies and IRDye secondary antibodies on Odyssey Fluorescence Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, USA). The density of the immunoblots was analyzed using Odyssey V3.0 software and normalized with β-Actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing MUC1 Expression on Cell Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate MUC1 expression on the surface of MUC1+B16 cell, MCF7 and MUC1+B16 cell surface protein were isolated using Cell Surface Protein Isolation Kit(Pierce) according to the standard manual. The isolated cell surface protein samples were analyzed by western blotting. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane. The membrane was incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-MUC1 antibody(abcam, ab22711), followed by FITC-flourecent goat anti mouse IgG and finally visualized using Odyssey fluorescence imaging system(LICOR, US). To further investigate the binding profiles of anti-serum from the CTB-MUC1-alum-CpG group with native human MUC1, surface plasmon resonance analysis was conducted as previously described [40 (link)]. cells were blocked in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 5% BSA and then incubated at 37°C with anti-serum from the CTB-MUC1-alum-CpG group. (1:100) for 1 h. The cells were then washed three times with PBS (pH 7.4) and then incubated at 37°C with PE-labeled rat anti-mouse IgG1 for another 1 h and fixed before labeling the nuclei with Hoechst 33258. Next, the cells were observed with a flouresent microscope (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nuclear and Total Protein Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nuclear proteins and total proteins were isolated as previously described [16 (link)]. The protein levels of target genes were detected using specific primary antibodies and IRDye secondary antibodies on an Odyssey Fluorescence Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, USA) as described previously [19 (link), 35 (link), 36 (link)]. The density of the immunoblots was analyzed using Odyssey V3.0 software
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of ER Stress Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were mixed with Laemmli buffer plus dithiothreitol (DTT), heated for 5 min at 95 °C, and loaded onto SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate—polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) gels. The gels were run in Tris–Glycine SDS running buffer and then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Blocking consisted of at 5% skim milk or 2.5% BSA, depending on the primary antibody used. Imaging was performed using the Li-Cor Odyssey fluorescence imaging system. Primary antibodies consisted of: monoclonal mouse anti-6xHis-Tag (Invitrogen, MA1-21315; 1:4000), polyclonal rabbit anti-ATF6 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1-75478; 1:1000), monoclonal rabbit anti-BiP (Cell Signaling Technology, C50B12; 1:1000), monoclonal rabbit anti-Calnexin (Cell Signaling Technology, C5C9; 1:1000), monoclonal rabbit anti-COG5 (Sigma-Aldrich, SAB4200440; 1:600), monoclonal mouse anti-GAPDH (Invitrogen, ZG003; 1:4000), monoclonal mouse anti-GFP (Cell Signaling Technology, 2955S; 1:1000), polyclonal rabbit anti-IRE1a (Cell Signaling Technology, 3294S; 1:1000), monoclonal rabbit anti-PDI (Cell Signaling Technology, 2446S; 1:1000), and monoclonal rabbit anti-PERK (Cell Signaling Technology, D11A8; 1:1000). Secondary antibodies consisted of: Donkey anti-Rabbit IRDye 680, Donkey anti-Rabbit IRDye 800, Donkey anti-Mouse IRDye 680, and Donkey anti-Mouse IRDye 800 (Li-Cor; 1:20,000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Apoptosis and ECM Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultured cells were lysed using RIPA lysis buffer supplemented with phosphatase and protease inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). Total protein was quantified using a bicinchoninic acid assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and then equal quantities of extracted protein (20–30 µg) were separated via 12 or 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electroblotted onto 0.22-µm PVDF membranes (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked using 5% BSA-PBS (Beyotime Biotechnology) at room temperature (RT = 25 °C) for 1 h, and then incubated with primary antibodies (Cleaved caspase-3, Cleaved PARP, BAX, BCL-2, Collagen II, MMP13, ADAMTS5). The membranes were washed with Tris-buffered saline (TBS)-0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) and subsequently incubated with anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody (cat. no. 5151; DyLight™ 800 4X PEG Conjugate; Cell Signaling Technology; 1:5000) for 1 h at RT in the dark. After washing in TBST, protein immunoreactivity was detected using the Odyssey Fluorescence Imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). Semi-quantitative analysis of protein band intensity was conducted using the ImageJ v1.8.0 software (National Institutes of Health) and normalized to the intensity of the internal loading control, β-actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative ELISA and Immunoblotting Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ELISA, the optical density value for each condition was calculated based on the formulae of the standard. For biochemistry experiment, subunit integrated density values (IDVs) were quantified on immunoblots by using the Quantity One or Odyssey fluorescence imaging system (Li-Cor). The fluorescence intensity values were quantified by using ImageJ. Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software). Details on statistical analysis and experimental design, including tests performed, exact p values, and sample sizes are provided in the result section describing each figure, or within the legend of each figure. All data were expressed as mean ± S.E.M values. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), including one-way and two-way ANOVA, unpaired Student t tests, one sample t test were used. Post hoc and a priori Bonferroni comparisons or Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparison test were conducted to evaluate individual mean comparisons where appropriate. All analyses used an alpha level of 0.05 to determine statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Determining Cathepsin Probe Potency and Selectivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the potency and selectivity of the Cy5-probes, each active site-titrated cathepsin was preincubated separately in the assay buffer for 15 min at 37 °C at a concentration of 10 nM (experiment A) or 100 nM (experiment B), and then mixed with various concentrations of either the MP-cL3 or MP-pc1 probe for 30 min. In experiment A, the probe concentrations were 2 nM, 10 nM, 50 nM and 250 nM, while in experiment B the probe concentrations were 20 nM, 100 nM, 500 nM and 2.5 μM. The reaction volume for all the samples was 200 μL. After 30 min, 100 μL of 3× SDS/DTT was added to the reaction mixtures, the samples were boiled for 5 min, and then 20 μL of the sample was run on 4–12% Bis-Tris Plus 15-well gels for 30 min at 200 V with 2 μL of PageRuler™ Prestained Protein Ladder. The gels were then directly scanned at 700 nm (red channel for Cy5 detection; excitation 685 nm) using an Odyssey fluorescence imaging system (LI-COR) and the images were analyzed using Image Studio software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of EMT Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were collected and added to RIPA lysate buffer (plus 100:1 phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and phosphatase inhibitor) for protein extraction, and a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein concentration kit (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) was used to determine the protein concentrations. Equal amounts of protein samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose (NC) filter membranes, and blocked using 5% skim milk powder. After washing the membranes, α-SMA antibody (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA), E-cadherin (1:1000; Affinity Biosciences, Cincinnati, OH, USA; AF0131), N-cadherin (1:5000; Abcam ab76011, Cambridge, MA, USA), FAK (1:1000; Abcam ab40794), P-FAK (1:1000; Abcam ab81298), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GAPDH) (1:5000; Shanghai Dianyin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C. The membranes were washed again and incubated with secondary antibody (EarthOx Life Sciences, Millbrae, CA, USA) for 1 hour at room temperature. The membranes were washed and detected using an ODYSSEY fluorescence imaging system (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Finally, the OD values for each group were analyzed using ImageJ image analysis software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!