The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Peroxidase labeled secondary antibody

Manufactured by Nichirei Biosciences
Sourced in Japan

Peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody is a commonly used reagent in immunoassays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blotting. It consists of a secondary antibody that is conjugated with the enzyme horseradish peroxidase. This labeling enables the detection and quantification of target antigens or proteins in biological samples through a colorimetric or chemiluminescent signal.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using peroxidase labeled secondary antibody

1

Immunohistochemistry of Mouse Skin and Lungs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Section (6-µm thickness) from paraffin-embedded mouse skin and lungs were deparaffinized and incubated overnight at 4 °C with mouse mAbs to CD3 (1:200; Nichirei Bioscience), F4/80 (1:1600; Abcam), and α-SMA (1:200; DAKO), followed by incubation with peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Nichirei BioScience) and color development with the aminoethyl carbazole system (Nichirei BioScience) [28 (link)]. Immunostained cells were counted in three high-power microscopic fields. Each section was examined independently by two investigators (T.C. and N.O.) in a blinded manner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Skin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections (6 μm in thickness) from paraffin-embedded mouse skin were incubated for 120 minutes at room temperature with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to CD3 (1:200; Nichirei Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan), F4/80 (1:1600; Abcam), and p-Smad3 (1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), then with peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Nichirei Biosciences), followed by color development with the aminoethylcarbazole system (Nichirei Biosciences). CD3+ cells, F4/80+ cells, and p-Smad3-positive cells were counted under a high-power microscopic field (the Hall section for CD3+ cells and distinct fields for the F4/80+ cells and p-Smad3-positive cells). Each section was examined independently by two investigators (TC and NO) in a blinded manner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein samples for western blot analysis were prepared as described previously [22] (link). Briefly, MSCs (passages 3–5) were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and then treated with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 2% SDS (Sigma-Aldrich) and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Samples were centrifuged for 1 h at 18,000× g at 4°C. The supernatants were collected as whole cell lysates. Protein concentrations were estimated using a DC protein assay (Bio-Rad) with a bovine serum albumin standard. Equal amounts of proteins (10 µg) were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 4–20% acrylamide gradient gels (Bio-Rad) and then transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride microporous membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA). The membranes were blocked with a blocking reagent (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan) and then incubated with each primary antibody. The primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti-PCAF, rabbit anti-HIF-1α (Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-VEGF (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and rabbit anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology). After washing, the membranes were incubated with a peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) and visualized using Immunostar LD (Wako). Images were captured digitally using a ChemiDoc XRS+ (Bio-Rad) and analyzed by Image Lab 2.0.1 software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis of Cerebral Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed according to a previously described procedure with minor modifications.49 (link) Cerebral tissues were homogenized in 9 volumes of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 (Tris buffer), and protease inhibitor cocktail (PIC; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), followed by sonication and centrifugation at 18,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C. Residual pellets were lysed with 7 volumes of Tris buffer containing 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and PIC, followed by sonication and centrifugation. Samples containing equal amounts of proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE on 4%–20% TGX (Tris-glycine extended) gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes using the Trans-Blot Turbo System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The membranes were stained with Ponceau S (Nacalai, Tokyo) for the analysis of total proteins. After a brief wash, the membranes were dipped in a blocking buffer (Tris buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% gelatin, 0.1% casein, and 0.05% Tween 20) and incubated with each primary antibody. Membranes were then immunostained with peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed using a Chemi Doc XRS + System and Image Lab software (Bio-Rad). Quantitative analysis of the target band was performed by normalizing the total protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mouse Skin and Lung

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, the mouse skin and lung sections were deparaffinized, and antigen-retrieved by incubating with HistoVT One (Nacalai Tesque) at 90°C for 10 min. Subsequently, the slides were incubated for 10 min with solution to block endogenous peroxidase and alkaline phosphatase (BLOXALL, Vector Laboratories). Next, the slides were immunostained with monoclonal antibodies against mouse CD3 (Adjusted, Nichirei Biosciences) or F4/80 (1:250, Abcam), anti-αSMA antibody (1:200, Abcam), anti-p-Smad3 antibody (1:200, Cell Signaling Technology, USA), anti-calpain 1 antibody (1:200, Abcam), anti-calpain 2 antibody (1:200, Abcam), peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Nichirei Biosciences), and a coloration substrate system with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Nichirei Biosciences). αSMA- or Calpain-positive area was assessed as follows. One representative section of each mouse was photographed at five random locations in the 200 × field of the microscopic view for analysis. Then, the αSMA- or calpain-positive area was determined through pixelization of the staining area using Photoshop software (ver. 16).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of NOX1 and NOX4 in Achilles Tendons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four Achilles tendons of rats in each group were used for immunohistological analysis of NOX1 and NOX4. Longitudinal sections of frozen Achilles tendons were cut to a thickness of 7 μm and fixed with 10% phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde at room temperature. The sections were incubated with proteinase for 10 min and treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide (Wako Pure Chemical Corp.) to block endogenous peroxidase activity, and then incubated with anti-NOX1 or anti-NOX4 antibodies (both 1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) overnight at 4 °C. Sections were incubated with a peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody (Nichirei Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan) for 30 min at room temperature, followed by incubation with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine peroxidase substrate (Nichirei Bioscience) [11 (link), 27 (link)]. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. To quantitatively evaluate NOX1 and NOX4 immunostaining, the percentage of NOX1 and NOX4 staining was calculated by two independent researchers using Adobe Photoshop CC 2020 software (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) as the ratio of stained brown pixels to total pixels of the entire tendon in a randomly selected area from each tendon slide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!