The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stat1 antibody

Manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology
Sourced in United States

The STAT1 antibody is a laboratory tool used to detect and study the STAT1 protein, which is a key transcription factor involved in cellular signaling pathways. This antibody can be used in various applications, such as Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and immunohistochemistry, to investigate the expression, localization, and interactions of STAT1 in different cell types or tissues.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using stat1 antibody

1

Comprehensive Immune Marker Antibody Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBRM1 antibody (A301-591A) was from Bethyl Laboratories. Phospho-STAT1 antibody (clone ST1P-11A5; Tyr701; 33-3400), human CD3 antibody (clone F7.2.38; MA5-12577), human CD45RO antibody (clone UCHL1; MA5-11532), human CD4 antibody (clone 4B12; MS1528S0), and human CD8 antibody (clone C8/144B; MS457S0) were from ThermoFisher Scientific. Mouse CD3 antibody (D4V8L; 99940), mouse CD8 antibody(D4W22; 98941), mouse CD4 antibody (D7D2Z; 25229), human PD-L1 antibody (E1L3N; 13684), mouse PD-L1 antibody (D5V3B; 64988), mouse PD-1 antibody (D7D5W; 84651), PBRM1 antibody (D3F7O, 91894), JAK1 antibody (6G4, 3344), JAK2 antibody (D2E12, 3230), Phospho-JAK1 antibody (D7N4Z, Tyr1034/1035, 74129), Phospho-JAK2 antibody (C80C3, Tyr1007/1008, 3776), STAT1 antibody (D1K9Y, 14994), Phospho-STAT1 antibody (58D6, Tyr701, 9167), Phospho-STAT1 antibody (D3B7, Ser727, 8826), IRF1 antibody (D5E4, 8478), and BRG1 antibody (E9O6E; 52251) were from Cell Signaling Technology. IFNGR1 antibody (112802) was from BioLegend. IFNGR2 antibody (Cat No. GTX 64548) was from GeneTex. β-actin antibody (A1978) was from Sigma. Human IFNγ (285-IF-100) and mouse IFNγ (8234-MB-010) were from R&D Systems.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Stat1 ChIP-Seq in Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ChIP, 4 × 106 cells (differentiated and undifferentiated SCs) were treated with fresh 1% formaldehyde (#J60401, ThermoFisher) for cell cross-linking, which was terminated with 125 mM glycine. Cells were harvested and enzymatically digested to disrupt chromatin, breaking genomic DNA to 100–500 bp. Afterwards, the chromatin fragments (~ 300 µg) were incubated with Stat1 antibody (5 μg, Cell Signaling, #14994) at 4 °C overnight, followed by the addition of ChIP Grade proteinA/G beads (20 μl, #26156, ThermoFisher) for a further 4–6 h at 4 °C. The beads were then melted with proteinase K, followed by extraction using a DNA extraction kit for DNA library construction and sequencing analysis. The prepared ChIP-Seq libraries were detected using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000, and ChIP-Seq data were read and aligned to the rat genome (Rn6) using Bowtie2 v2.3.5.1. Based on the ENCODE (v90) overlap rule, the MACS version 1.4.2 (http://liulab.dfci.harvard.edu/MACS) was used to perform peak calling with a p-value cutoff of 10–9, and used the software IGV 2.9.4 to show the peaks. Furthermore, the motifs likely to be targeted by Stat1 were predicted using the HOMER v4.11 program (http://homer.salk.edu/homer). The data have been submitted to the GEO repository (GEO Series accession number: GSE211337).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Regulation of STAT1 and IRF1 by miR-103

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RAW264.7 cells were plated in 24-well culture plates at a concentration of 5×104 cells/well and transfected with miR-103 mimics or NC. After 24 h, the cells were stimulated by IFNγ and LPS for 24h. Thereafter, the treated cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 30 minutes and then incubated in 10% normal mice serum for 30 minutes. The cells were then incubated with STAT1 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) or IRF1 (8478, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C. The secondary antibodies FITC Mouse Anti-Rabbit IgG (BOSTER, Wuhan, China) was used for 1 hour. Sections were counterstained with DAPI and analyzed with a fluorescence microscope (IX73, Olympus, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ChIP-qPCR Analysis of Stat1 Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pooled differentiating Schwann cells were fixed with fresh 1% formaldehyde (J60401,ThermoFisher) for 20 min, and enzymatically lysed to break genomic DNA to 200 and 1000 bp. Sheared chromatins were incubated with 5 µg of Stat1 antibody (Cell Signaling, #14994) at 4 °C. Magna ChIP G Kit (Merck Millipore) was used to perform ChIP experiments. The DNAs obtained by Stat1 ChIP were used as the templates for quantitative real-time PCR, and the IgG group served as a control. The relative fold enrichment was calculated using the 2−ΔCT method to determine the specific region bound by the Stat1 protein. Primers used to study gene promoter regions such as Ano1, Nts, C1qb and Rab11fip1 are provided in Additional file 5: Table S4.3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of Stat1 and NF-κB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin from MSCs was crosslinked by formaldehyde treatment and immunoprecipitated using a Pierce Agarose ChIP kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Purified chromatin (10 μg) was normalized to input and immunoprecipitated using 6 μg of NF-κB p65 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), Stat1 antibody at 1:50 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) or 1 μl of rabbit IgG control. Immunoprecipitated DNA was subject to quantitative PCR (qPCR) to determine enrichment of Stat1 homodimers and NF-κB binding to respective promoters and results were normalized to control group. Primers used for qPCR were as follows: binding of Stat1 homodimers to mouse iNOS promoter, forward 5′-GGCACCATCTAACCTCAC-3′ and reverse 5′-CAGCACGTAGTCACTTCA-3′; NF-κB binding to mouse iNOS promoter, forward 5′-TGAGGATACACCACAGAGT-3′ and reverse 5′-GTGCAAGTTAGCTCATTCAT-3′; binding of Stat1 homodimers to mouse Ccl5 promoter, forward 5′-TATAGGGAGCCAGGGTAGCA-3′ and reverse 5′-GCAACAAGTGTTTGGTGTCTTT-3′; NF-κB binding to mouse Ccl5 promoter, forward 5′-AGCCAGGGTAGCAGAGGAA-3′ and reverse 5′-ATGACAGCAACAAGTGTTTGGT-3′.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Inflammatory Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot tests were performed as previously described [10 (link)]. The primary antibodies included anti-β-actin antibody (1:10000, a-5441, Sigma), anti-iNOS (1:500, abs130136, Absin), anti-TNF-α (1:500, ab1793, Abcam), anti-arginase-1 antibody (1:1000, sc-21050, Abcam), anti-STAT1 antibody (1:1000, #9172, Cell Signaling), and anti-phospho-STAT1 antibody (1:1000, #9167, Cell Signaling). The blots were then developed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Finally, the blots were enhanced by chemiluminescence detection before photography. The relative density of the comparable results was measured by ImageJ 1.37v software (Wayne Rasband).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optimizing SARS-CoV-2 Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 23 genes of SARS-CoV-2 (IPBCAMS-WH-01/2019 strain, no. EPI_ISL_402123) were optimized by Gene Designer 1.0 and cloned to vector pCMV6-entry expression vector with the FLAG-tag or HA-tag at C-terminus. Plasmids Flag-RIG-I, Flag-RIG-IN, Flag-MDA5, HA-MAVS, pGL3-IFN-β–Luc, IRF3-5D-Flag, and pRL-TK have been described elsewhere42 . The mutated variants of the SARS-CoV-2 ORF6-tagged Flag were constructed by using a Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). All variants were confirmed by subsequent sequencing.
The antibodies used in this research were: Flag antibody from Sigma-Aldrich (1:4000, Cat# F3165); β-actin antibody from Sigma–Aldrich (1:4000, Cat# A5441); HA antibody from Sigma–Aldrich (1:10,000, Cat# H9658); STAT1 antibody from Cell Signaling technology (1:1000, Cat# 9172); P-STAT1 antibody from Thermo Fisher (1:1000, Cat# 700349); Sev antibody from MBL (1:2000, PD029C1). Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay System was purchased from Progema (Madison, WI). IRDye 800-labeled IgG and IRDye 680-labeled IgG secondary antibodies were purchased from Li-Cor Biosciences (Lincoln, NE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Staining of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed with PBS buffer and fixed with 4% formalin. Then cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100. After cells were washed with PBS, they were blocked and stained with primary antibodies, followed by staining with an Alexa Fluor 488 secondary antibody45 . Nuclei were stained with DAPI (Sigma). The antibodies used in this research were: IRF3 antibody from Cell Signaling technology (1:200, Cat# 11904); STAT1 antibody from Cell Signaling technology (1:400, Cat# 14994); P-STAT1 antibody from Cell Signaling technology (1:400, Cat# 9167); Calnexin antibody from Cell Signaling technology (1:50, Cat# 2679); GolgiB1 antibody from Sigma-Aldrich (1:500, Cat# HPA011008). Fluorescence images were obtained and analyzed using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

ChIP-qPCR Analysis of Stat1 and NF-κB Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin from MSCs was crosslinked by formaldehyde treatment and immunoprecipitated using a Pierce Agarose ChIP kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Purified chromatin (10 μg) was normalized to input and immunoprecipitated using 6 μg of NF-κB p65 antibody (Abcam), Stat1 antibody at 1:50 (Cell Signaling Technology) or 1 μl of rabbit IgG control. Immunoprecipitated DNA was subjected to quantitative PCR to determine the enrichment of Stat1 homodimers and NF-κB binding to respective promoters, and results were normalized to control group. Primers used for quantitative PCR were as follows: binding of Stat1 homodimers to mouse iNOS promoter, forward 5′-GGCACCATCTAACCTCAC-3′ and reverse 5′-CAGCACGTAGTCACTTCA-3′ NF-κB binding to mouse iNOS promoter, forward 5′- TGAGGATACACCACAGAGT-3′ and reverse 5′-GTGCAAGTTAGCTCATTCAT-3′ binding of Stat1 homodimers to mouse Ccl5 promoter, forward 5′-TATAGGGAGCCAGGGTAGCA-3′ and reverse 5′-GCAACAAGTGTTTGGTGTCTTT-3′ NF-κB binding to mouse Ccl5 promoter, forward 5′-AGCCAGGGTAGCAGAGGAA-3′ and reverse 5′-ATGACAGCAACAAGTGTTTGGT-3′.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

STAT1 Activation Visualization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were starved overnight and treated with 100 U/ml IFNγ for 3 h. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized for 5 min with 0.3% Triton-X100, blocked with 2% BSA for 1 h. Cells were incubated with STAT1 antibody (14994, Cell Signaling Technology) overnight after which they were incubated for 1 h at RT to secondary anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 488 (Jackson ImmunoResearch), followed by incubation with Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min. Confocal images were acquired with ZEN software on a Zeiss LSM 710 Confocal system (Carl Zeiss Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!