The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

27 protocols using dig dna labelling and detection kit

1

Site-directed mutagenesis of ureA::gfp

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Site-directed mutagenesis on the ureA::gfp gene was performed by the fusion PCR technique [79 (link)] using KAPA HiFi DNA polymerase (KAPA Biosystems) with primers Ure5-F, Ure3-R and complementary ones carrying the desired substitution (see the electronic supplementary material, table S3). DNA extracted from a ureA::gfp::AFpyrG strain (MVD 10A) was used as a template. A resulting 7 kb fusion product was amplified with nested primers Ure5-N and Ure3-N and purified with the GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific). The resulting construct was transformed in a ureAΔ::riboB pyrG89 pyroA4 riboB2 nkuAΔ::argB veA1 strains (MVD 13A and isogenic yA2 MVD 14A). Protoplasts were plated on selective (lacking uridine and uracil) 1 M sucrose MM and incubated at 37°C. Transformants were purified on selective MM, and its ability to grow in different concentrations of urea and 2-thiorea was tested. Transformants showing a riboB2 phenotype were preferentially selected for further analysis as this was indicative of integration of the construct at the ureA locus. Assessment of single copy or multicopy transformants was performed by a DIG DNA labelling and detection kit (Roche Applied Science). Sequencing of the resulting mutants was performed in Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Site-directed mutagenesis of ureA::gfp

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Site-directed mutagenesis on the ureA::gfp gene was performed by the Fusion-PCR technique [55 (link)] using KAPA HiFi DNA polymerase (KAPA Biosystems) with primers Ure5-F, Ure3-R and complementary ones carrying the desired substitution (electronic supplementary material, table S2). DNA extracted from a ureA::gfp::AFpyrG strain (MVD 10A) was used as template. A resulting 7 kb fusion product was amplified with nested primers Ure5-N and Ure3-N and purified with the GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific). The resulting construct was transformed in a ureAΔ::riboB pyrG89 pyroA4 riboB2 nkuAΔ::argB veA1 strain (MVD 13A). Protoplasts were plated on selective (containing riboflavin, but not uridine and uracil) 1 M sucrose MM and incubated at 37°C. Transformants were purified on selective MM and its ability to grow both in different concentrations of urea and 2-thiourea was tested. Southern blots were performed in order to check the integration to the ureA locus and to assess the number of construction copies integrated in the genome. Probes were labelled with the DIG DNA labelling and detection kit (Roche Applied Science). Sequencing of the resulting mutants was performed at Macrogen, Inc. (Seoul, Korea).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of siRNA Expression in Transgenic Cotton

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total small RNA population was isolated from the leaves of transgenic and NT control plants43 (link). It was performed to assess the expression level of siRNA in transgenic (T0, T1) plants with respect to corresponding non-transformed cotton plants. The low molecular weight RNA were separated on denaturing polyacrylamide gel (PAGE 15%) and transferred onto a Hybond-N nylon membrane (GE Healthcare, UK). Hybridization was performed with CLCuMuV-C4 gene-based DIG-11-dUTP labelled probe at 42 °C in DIG Easy Hyb solution using DIG DNA labelling and detection kit (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). The membrane was equilibrated in Detection buffer containing NBT/BCIP-T under Gel Doc™ EZ System (BioRad, USA) using the Image Lab™ software Version 4.1. siRNA fragments (20–25 nt long) were visualized, which were compared with the original PAGE exhibiting ultra-low range RNA marker (Thermo Scientific, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genomic DNA Clones HBB-eGFP Verification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10 μg of genomic DNA from potential HBB-eGFP reporter clones were digested with HindIII (NEB) overnight at 37 °C and run on a 1% agarose gel. The DNA was transferred from the gel to a positively charged nylon membrane using a standard protocol. The DIG DNA Labelling and Detection Kit (Roche) in combination with a GFP fragment (see Table 2 for primer sequences) was used for probe labelling, hybridization and signal detection according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genomic DNA Clones HBB-eGFP Verification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10 μg of genomic DNA from potential HBB-eGFP reporter clones were digested with HindIII (NEB) overnight at 37 °C and run on a 1% agarose gel. The DNA was transferred from the gel to a positively charged nylon membrane using a standard protocol. The DIG DNA Labelling and Detection Kit (Roche) in combination with a GFP fragment (see Table 2 for primer sequences) was used for probe labelling, hybridization and signal detection according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Validating Wolbachia Infections in Drosophila

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR amplicons were also authenticated by Southern hybridisation using DIG DNA Labelling and Detection Kit (Roche Applied Sciences, Indianapolis, IN) based on the higher sensitivity method outlined in Arthofer et al. [47 (link)]. The wsp probe was generated as described in Additional file 3, using D. melanogaster w1118 DNA as template. This method was applied to all individuals, to also confirm the absence of wsp amplicons. Flies were classified as uninfected when repeated amplification attempts with wsp and 16S rDNA were negative but COI was positive. Individuals were considered Wolbachia infected when wsp and 16S rDNA primers amplified appropriately sized fragments from species for which we had established complete MLST profiles; wsp amplicons hybridised to the wsp probe; and wsp amplicons produced sequence homologues. The COI locus of selected infected and uninfected flies was sequenced to determine the host-mitochondrial association of Wolbachia sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Southern Blot Analysis of Transgenic Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was isolated by CTAB method as described [66 (link)]. After digestion with restriction enzymes EcoRI and XbaI, the DNA samples, 15 µg each lane, and the Dig labelled marker were separated by electrophoresis on 1.0% agarose gel and transferred to a Hybond-N+ nylon membrane (Amersham, Singapore). Primers used for amplification of NptII and bar gene are listed in Supplementary Data. NptII and bar gene fragments were used as probes for checking T-DNA insertion number for MsLS RNAi lines and lines expressing heterologous monoterpene synthases, respectively. DNA probe was generated by DIG probe synthesis kit and membranes were hybridized and washed according to a DIG DNA labelling and detection kit (Roche, Singapore). The hybridization bands were visualized by ChemiDocTM Touch Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Singapore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of IS30 in i211 and i232 derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain individual colonies from i211- and i232-derived populations, 10 μl aliquot from the original stocks stored at –70°C was grown overnight at 37°C in 5 ml LB+Cm+Ap broth. 200 μl of the cultures was transferred into 5 ml LB+Ap or LB+Cm+Ap supplemented with 10 μM IPTG and incubated 20 hours at 37°C. Single colonies were isolated by plating the cultures on LB+Ap and their resistance phenotype was determined by replica plating. Total DNA from 38 i211 and 32 i232 derivative colonies was isolated and analysed by Southern hybridization using the whole IS30 sequence as a probe. Total DNA was overnight digested with EcoRI-XhoI and separated on 0.8% agarose gel for 20 hours at 4°C and 15 mA. Hybridization and labelling were performed using the DIG DNA Labelling and Detection Kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Membranes (Biodyne) were developed using the fluorescent substrate CSPD (Roche) and exposed onto Kodak X-OMAT film.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Confirming Transgenic Plant Genotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GFP selection was used to identify transgenic plants. To confirm gene insertion, DNA was isolated from GFP-positive plants and checked using PCR. DNA-positive lines were then subjected to Southern blot using the digoxigenin (DIG) wash and block buffer set from Roche (IN, USA). The PCR DIG probe synthesis kit from Roche (IN, USA) was used to generate the DNA probe against the Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter (Hart and Basu, 2009 (link)). Around 20 µg of genomic DNA was digested at 37 °C with NdeI for 18 h. Digested product was electrophoresed on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel at 40 V for 5 h. Next, the gel was transported to a nylon membrane and hybridized with the CaMV 35S promoter probe using a DIG DNA labelling and detection kit (Roche). This was followed by antibody binding and chemiluminescent reaction change by CDP star. Lastly, a film was used for exposing the membrane for analysis of the number of T-DNA insertions visualized by the ChemiDoc™ Touch Imaging System (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genomic DNA Blotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digests of genomic A. balhimycina DNA were separated in 1% agarose gels in Tris-acetate buffer and transferred to Hybond-N Nylon membranes (GE Healthcare, München, Germany). For labelling of DNA probes and hybridisation the nonradioactive DIG DNA Labelling and Detection Kit from Roche was used at high stringency (0.1% SDS/0.1 × SSC, 68 °C). As a size standard, the DIG-labelled DNA Molecular Weight Marker VII (Roche) with the following fragment lengths (in base pairs) was used: 81, 359, 492, 710, 992, 1164, 1482, 1515, 1882, 1953, 2799, 3639, 4899, 6106, 7427 and 8576. The procedure followed a standard protocol.60
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!