The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Biograph mmr pet mr scanner

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany, United States

The Biograph mMR PET/MR scanner is a medical imaging device that combines positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technologies. It allows for simultaneous acquisition of PET and MRI data, providing a comprehensive view of the patient's physiology and anatomy.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using biograph mmr pet mr scanner

1

Multimodal PET/MRI Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All PET/MRI scans were performed at the National University of Singapore (NUS) Clinical Imaging Research Centre using a Siemens Biograph mMR PET/MR scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Prior to FDG PET/MRI, participants fasted for 6 h, following which an intravenous injection of 18F-FDG (mean activity 138.4 ± 9.4 MBq) was given to each participant. Fasting was not required prior to DOTANOC PET/MRI. An intravenous injection of 68Ga-DOTANOC (191.7 ± 9.3 MBq) was given. Scans for both radioligands were commenced immediately and data acquired up to 80 min post injection.
The PET images were reconstructed using Ordinary-Poisson Ordered-Subset Expectation–Maximisation (OP-OSEM) with 3 iterations and 21 subsets. A Gaussian post-smoothing filter of 6 mm full-width at half maximum (FWHM) was applied. The matrix size was 172 × 172, with a voxel size of 4.17 × 4.17 mm and slice thickness of 2.03 mm.
The MRI data was acquired using 12-channel body coils. Dixon images were collected for the purpose of MR-based Attenuation Correction (MRAC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Longitudinal PiB-PET and MRI in Alzheimer's

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants underwent simultaneous three-dimensional (3D) [11C] Pittsburg compound B (PiB)-positron emission tomography (PET) and 3D T1-weighted MRI scans using a 3.0T Biograph mMR (PET-MR) scanner (Siemens; Washington DC, WC, USA) at baseline and 2-year follow-up visit. The details of PiB-PET acquisition and preprocessing were previously described [36 (link)]. An automatic anatomic labeling algorithm [46 (link)] and a region combining method [47 (link)] were applied to determine regions of interests (ROIs) to characterize the PiB retention level in the frontal, lateral parietal, posterior cingulate-precuneus, and lateral temporal regions. A global Aβ retention value was the mean standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) for all voxels of the four ROIs, calculated by dividing the mean uptake value of a reference region. For cross-sectional analysis of baseline data, the inferior cerebellar gray matter in the Spatially Unbiased Infratentorial Template for the cerebellum (SUIT) atlas [48 (link)] was used as the reference region for intensity normalization. For longitudinal analysis, the reference region included the inferior cerebellar grey matter in the SUIT, cerebellar white matter (thresholded at 50%) [49 (link)], pons, and cerebrum white matter (thresholded at 95% and eroded by 3 voxels) [50 (link), 51 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Amyloid PET Imaging and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants underwent simultaneous three-dimensional (3D) [11C] Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-positron emission tomography (PET) and 3D T1-weighted MRI scan using a 3.0T Biograph mMR (PET-MR) scanner (Siemens), in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines. The details of the PiB-PET imaging acquisition and preprocessing were described previously (Park et al., 2019 (link)). An automatic anatomical labeling algorithm and a region-combining method (Reiman et al., 2009 (link)) were applied to determine regions of interest (ROIs) for characterization of PiB retention levels in the frontal, lateral parietal, posterior cingulate-precuneus, and lateral temporal regions. Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) values for each ROI were calculated by dividing the mean value for all voxels within each ROI by the mean cerebellar uptake value in the same image. A global cortical ROI consisting of the four ROIs was defined and a global Aβ retention value was generated by dividing the mean value for all voxels of the global cortical ROI by the mean cerebellar uptake value in the same image (Reiman et al., 2009 (link); Choe et al., 2014 (link)). Each participant was classified as Aβ-positive (Aβ+) if the SUVR value was > 1.4 in at least one of the four ROIs or as Aβ-negative (Aβ-) if the SUVR value was ≤ 1.4 for all four ROIs (Reiman et al., 2009 (link); Jack et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data acquisition was performed with a 3 T Siemens Biograph mMR-PET/MR scanner equipped with a 16-channel head-neck coil. The multi-shell dMRI protocol comprised a total of 100 diffusion weighted images (DWIs) (TR/TE 5355/104 ms; voxel size 2 × 2 × 2 mm3; FOV 220 × 220 mm2; 68 slices; multiband accelerator factor = 2): 10 images at b = 0 s/mm2, 30 DWIs at b value = 710 s/mm2 and 60 DWIs at b value = 2855 s/mm2. This High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI) protocol is the optimized two shells Neurite Orientation and Dispersion Density Imaging (NODDI) protocol as described in (Zhang et al. 2012 (link)). Each diffusion direction was acquired with reverse phase encoding directions, i.e., anterior–posterior and posterior–anterior directions, for distortion correction purposes.
In addition, the acquisition protocol included anatomical imaging, which comprised a 3D T2-weighted (T2w) Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) image (TR/TE 5000/395 ms; TI 1800 ms; voxel size 1 × 1 × 1 mm3; FOV 250 × 250 mm2; 160 slices), two 3D T1-weighted (T1w) magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE, TR/TE 2400/3.2 ms; TI 1000 ms; voxel size 1 × 1 × 1 mm3; FOV 256 × 256 mm2; 160 slices) acquired both before and after contrast agent injection and a T2w image (TR/TE 3200/536 ms; voxel size 1 × 1 × 1 mm3; FOV 256 × 256 mm2; 160 slices).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Neuroimaging Protocol for Alzheimer's

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants underwent simultaneous three‐dimensional [11C] Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET and MRI, including three‐dimensional (3D) T1‐weighted images, 3D fluid‐attenuated inversion‐recovery (FLAIR) images, T2‐weighted images, and susceptibility‐weighted images using a 3.0 T Biograph mMR (PET‐MR) Scanner (Siemens, Washington DC, USA). Three‐dimensional T1‐weighted images and FLAIR images were acquired in the sagittal plane. Acquisition parameters for 3D T1‐weighted images were as follows: repetition time (TR), 1670 ms; echo time (TE), 1.89 ms; field of view (FOV), 250 mm; matrix, 256 × 256; slice thickness, 1.0 mm. The parameters for acquiring 3D FLAIR images were as follows: TR, 5000 ms; TE, 173 ms; echo spacing, 3.46 ms; FOV, 250 mm; matrix size, 256 × 256; slice thickness, 1.0 mm. Acquisition parameters for T2‐weighted images were as follows: TR, 5000 ms; TE, 91 ms; FOV, 199 × 200 mm; matrix size, 640 × 348; and slice thickness, 3.0 mm. Acquisition parameters for susceptibility‐weighted images were as follows: TR, 1670 ms; TE, 1.9 ms; FOV, 250 mm; matrix size, 448 × 255; and slice thickness, 3.0 mm. All participants also underwent [18F] AV‐1451 PET scans using a Biograph True Point 40 PET/CT Scanner (Siemens, Washington DC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PiB-PET and MRI Neuroimaging Protocol for Amyloid Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants underwent simultaneous three-dimensional [11C] Pittsburg compound B (PiB)-positron emission tomography (PET) and T1-weighted MRI scans using a 3.0T Biograph mMR (PET-MR) scanner (Siemens; Washington DC, WC, USA) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The details of PiB-PET acquisition and preprocessing were described in our previous report.(Park et al., 2019 (link)) An AAL algorithm and a region-combining method were applied to determine the regions of interest (ROIs) for characterization of PiB retention levels in the frontal, lateral parietal, posterior cingulate-precuneus, and lateral temporal regions. The standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) values for each ROI were calculated by dividing the mean value for all voxels within each ROI by the mean cerebellar uptake value on the same image. We defined a global cortical ROI consisting of the four ROIs and generated a global Aβ retention value by dividing the mean value for all voxels of the global cortical ROI by the mean cerebellar uptake value in the same image.(Reiman et al., 2009 (link)) We classified each participant as Aβ positive (Aβ+) if the SUVR value was >1.4 in at least one of the four ROIs.(Reiman et al., 2009 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PET Imaging of Beta-Amyloid Deposition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants underwent beta-amyloid-PET imaging with 18F-AV-45 (florbetapir). Participants received a single intravenous bolus of 370 MBq (10 mCi) of florbetapir infused over 60 seconds. Scans were acquired on a Siemens Biograph mMR PET/MR scanner and attenuation corrected with a corresponding CT. Data were processed using an ROI approach using FreeSurfer software. As described previously (Gordon et al., 2016 (link)), data between the 50- to 70-minute postinjection window were examined. In each ROI, data were converted to standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) using the cerebellar gray as the reference region and partial volume corrected using a regional spread function approach (Rousset et al., 1998 (link); Su et al., 2015 (link), 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PET/MRI Imaging Protocol for 18F-FDG Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET/MRI was performed at the A*STAR-NUS Clinical Imaging Research Centre (CIRC) in Singapore using a Siemens Biograph mMR PET/MR scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Participants received an intravenous injection of 18F-FDG with a mean activity of 148·6 ± 54·7 MBq (mean ± s.d.). PET data was acquired for 15 min at 60 min post-injection (62·3 ± 12.6 min [mean ± s.d.]). The PET images were reconstructed using Ordinary-Poisson Ordered-Subset Expectation-Maximisation (OP-OSEM) with three iterations and 21 subsets. A Gaussian post-smoothing filter of 6 mm full-width at half maximum (FWHM) was applied. The matrix size was 172 × 172, with a voxel size of 4·17 × 4·17 mm and slice thickness of 2·03 mm.
The MRI data was acquired using 12-channel body coils. Dixon images were collected for the purpose of MR-based Attenuation Correction (MRAC). In addition, all subjects underwent T2-weighted half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) with Prospective Acquisition CorrEction (PACE) and Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cardiac 18F-NaF PET-MRI Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All subjects were first scanned on a Biograph mMR PET-MR scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) for 75 minutes. MRI and PET scans were performed simultaneously on a single bed centered over the heart. The PET-MRI scan was started immediately after intravenous injection of 2.95 +/-0.21 mCi 18F-NaF. PET data was reconstructed from the last 15 minutes (60-75 min after injection) using an iterative reconstruction (Siemens OP-OSEM algorithm, 3 iterations, 21 subsets, matrix size 344x344 with Point Spread Function [15] correction) without ECG or respiratory gating to decrease the level of noise. The UMAP was created from a Dixon MRI sequence acquired at the beginning of the PET recording. The reconstructed images were smoothed with a 2mm FWHM Gaussian filter, matching the voxel dimension of 2 x 2 x 2 mm. 18F-NaF uptake in the scar and remote myocardium was quantified by the standardized uptake value (SUV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Guided Methionine PET Image Reconstruction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the effect of guiding methionine PET image reconstructions with FDG images we performed a 3D simulation study. Guided reconstruction performance was measured as a function of the reconstruction hyperparameters and compared to standard MLEM reconstructions followed by both Gaussian and FDG-derived non-local-means filters. Following this simulation study, the proposed method was applied to real FDG/methionine data acquired on a Siemens Biograph mMR PET-MR scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany).
Data simulation and image reconstruction were implemented in MATLAB (MathWorks, MA, USA), using in-house Siddon-based mMR projectors [27 (link)]. Vendor-provided software was used to obtain normalisation factors and scatter and randoms estimates for the real data reconstructions. Attenuation factors for the real data were calculated using the vendor-provided ultra-short echo time MR-based attenuation maps and the same in-house geometric projectors used for reconstruction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!