A two-side p-value of less than 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. SPSS Windows Version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform statistical analysis.
Spss windows version 23
SPSS Windows version 23.0 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It is designed for analyzing and managing data. The software provides a range of statistical analysis tools and data management functions.
21 protocols using spss windows version 23
Statistical Methods for Skewed and Normal Distributions
A two-side p-value of less than 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. SPSS Windows Version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform statistical analysis.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Study Variables
Minimally Invasive Segmentectomy in Pediatric Lung Conditions
Clinical data of children undergoing segmentectomy of S10 through the inferior pulmonary ligament approach
Patient number | Gender | Age | Weight(kg) | Symptomatic (Y/N) | Type of CLM | Type of resection | Operative time(min) | Blood loss(ml) | Drainage duration (days) | Duration of post-operative hospital stay(days) | Complications | Follow-up time(months) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | F | 10.0 | 9.5 | Y | ILS | segmentectomy | 106 | 10 | 3 | 5 | N | 5 |
2 | F | 5.0 | 7.0 | N | ILS | segmentectomy | 75 | 15 | 3 | 6 | N | 5 |
3 | F | 11.4 | 9.0 | N | CPAM | segmentectomy | 81 | 5 | 2 | 4 | N | 6 |
4 | M | 18.0 | 12.5 | N | ILS | segmentectomy | 65 | 10 | 2 | 4 | N | 6 |
5 | M | 6.3 | 8.5 | N | CPAM | segmentectomy | 57 | 20 | 3 | 5 | N | 7 |
6 | M | 4.5 | 8.0 | Y | ILS | segmentectomy | 109 | 10 | 3 | 5 | N | 8 |
7 | F | 7.7 | 10.0 | N | CPAM | segmentectomy | 80 | 10 | 3 | 5 | N | 9 |
8 | M | 96.0 | 27.0 | Y | ILS | segmentectomy | 61 | 5 | 3 | 6 | N | 9 |
9 | M | 58.0 | 17.0 | Y | CPAM | segmentectomy and partial wedge resection | 125 | 10 | 4 | 6 | N | 9 |
10 | M | 7.5 | 9.5 | N | CPAM | segmentectomy | 57 | 10 | 2 | 4 | N | 10 |
11 | F | 17.0 | 9.5 | Y | ILS | segmentectomy | 88 | 20 | 3 | 6 | subcutaneous emphysema | 10 |
12 | F | 4.6 | 8.0 | N | CPAM | segmentectomy | 58 | 5 | 4 | 7 | subcutaneous emphysema | 12 |
13 | M | 6.3 | 9.5 | N | ILS | segmentectomy | 85 | 10 | 2 | 4 | N | 13 |
14 | M | 31.0 | 16.5 | Y | CPAM | segmentectomy | 103 | 15 | 3 | 5 | N | 13 |
15 | M | 4.3 | 7.0 | N | CPAM | segmentectomy | 61 | 5 | 3 | 6 | subcutaneous emphysema | 13 |
Statistical Analysis Methodology for Research
Investigating Knowledge Levels in Research
Statistical Analysis of Network Measures
Network measures were compared between groups using GAT. Non-parametric permutation tests, each with 1,000 repetitions, were performed to test the statistical significance of between-group differences in global and regional network measures, with P < 0.05 (two-tailed) considered significant. Permutation analysis was also performed to assess between-group differences in network resilience against random failure and targeted attack, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. To reduce the impact of thresholding, we also compared the areas under the curves (AUCs) generated from density variation between groups. In addition, the false discovery rate (FDR) was applied to correct for multiple comparisons in the regional BC analysis, with P < 0.05 (FDR-corrected) considered statistically significant.
Multivariable Analysis of Factors Associated
The Hosmer and Lemeshow test was used to check the fitness of the model. For qualitative data, in-depth interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated to English. After reading the text several times, codes were given and related codes were categorized. Then, categories were merged to form themes. Finally, the findings were presented in narrations and triangulated with quantitative findings.
Epidemiological Data Analysis Protocol
Bivariate and Multivariate Analysis of Factors
Psychometric Validation of HM-PRO Instrument
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!