The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss windows version 23

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Windows version 23.0 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It is designed for analyzing and managing data. The software provides a range of statistical analysis tools and data management functions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

21 protocols using spss windows version 23

1

Statistical Methods for Skewed and Normal Distributions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The median and interquartile range (IQR) were used to describe continuous variables with a skewed distribution, while continuous variables with a normal distribution were presented as the mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare continuous variables with a skewed distribution, whereas the independent sample t test was conducted to compare continuous variables with a normal distribution. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables.
A two-side p-value of less than 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. SPSS Windows Version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Study Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collected data were analyzed using SPSS Windows version 23.0 and AMOS version 21.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). General characteristics of participants and characteristics of the study variables were presented as descriptive statistics, such as mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage. Tool reliability was confirmed through Cronbach’s α, and the normality of the study variables was confirmed through normalized skewness and kurtosis. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to confirm the validity of the factors, and convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity was confirmed. To evaluate model fit, chi-squared tests (χ2), the root mean square residual, comparative fit index, normed fit index, incremental fit index, Tucker–Lewis index, and root mean square error of approximation were used. Bootstrapping was used to test the significance of the indirect and total effects of the study model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Minimally Invasive Segmentectomy in Pediatric Lung Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous data were presented as medians and ranges, and categorical variables were presented as frequencies (%). Table 1 shows the clinical parameters. SPSS (Windows version 23.0; IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.

Clinical data of children undergoing segmentectomy of S10 through the inferior pulmonary ligament approach

Patient numberGenderAge(months)Weight(kg)Symptomatic (Y/N)Type of CLMType of resectionOperative time(min)Blood loss(ml)Drainage duration (days)Duration of post-operative hospital stay(days)ComplicationsFollow-up time(months)
1F10.09.5YILSsegmentectomy1061035N5
2F5.07.0NILSsegmentectomy751536N5
3F11.49.0NCPAMsegmentectomy81524N6
4M18.012.5NILSsegmentectomy651024N6
5M6.38.5NCPAMsegmentectomy572035N7
6M4.58.0YILSsegmentectomy1091035N8
7F7.710.0NCPAMsegmentectomy801035N9
8M96.027.0YILSsegmentectomy61536N9
9M58.017.0YCPAMsegmentectomy and partial wedge resection1251046N9
10M7.59.5NCPAMsegmentectomy571024N10
11F17.09.5YILSsegmentectomy882036subcutaneous emphysema10
12F4.68.0NCPAMsegmentectomy58547subcutaneous emphysema12
13M6.39.5NILSsegmentectomy851024N13
14M31.016.5YCPAMsegmentectomy1031535N13
15M4.37.0NCPAMsegmentectomy61536subcutaneous emphysema13
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis Methodology for Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Windows version 23.0 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The categorical data were described with frequency distributions and percentages and compared using the two-sided Fisher’s exact test or Pearson’s χ2 test. The normalization of the distributed data for the continuous variables was analyzed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Analysis of variance was used with Bonferroni post hoc correction to analyze continuous data with a normal distribution. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The non-normally distributed continuous data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U-test. p values < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Investigating Knowledge Levels in Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and categorical variables as number (n) or percentage (%). Independent sample t test and Chi-squared test were performed to investigate intergroup differences. Linear regression analysis was conducted to explore relations between factors and knowledge levels. SPSS Windows Version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism Version 7.04 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA) were used to perform statistical analysis. The significance level was set at 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Network Measures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All basic variables (age, sex, and educational level) were compared between groups using SPSS (Windows version 23.0, IBM). Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and categorical values as numbers (percentages). Categorical variables were compared between groups by the chi-square test, continuous variables by the Student’s t-test and ranked data by the rank-sum test. A P < 0.05 was considered significant for all SPSS tests.
Network measures were compared between groups using GAT. Non-parametric permutation tests, each with 1,000 repetitions, were performed to test the statistical significance of between-group differences in global and regional network measures, with P < 0.05 (two-tailed) considered significant. Permutation analysis was also performed to assess between-group differences in network resilience against random failure and targeted attack, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. To reduce the impact of thresholding, we also compared the areas under the curves (AUCs) generated from density variation between groups. In addition, the false discovery rate (FDR) was applied to correct for multiple comparisons in the regional BC analysis, with P < 0.05 (FDR-corrected) considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multivariable Analysis of Factors Associated

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data was collected, verified as complete, cleansed, coded, entered into EPI Data statistical software version 3.1, and then exported to SPSS Windows version 23 for additional analysis. The study population was described in relation to relevant variables using frequencies, proportions, and summary statistics, and then presented using text, tables, and figures. The bivariate analysis was employed to identify candidate variables for multivariable analysis. Then, to control potential confounding effects, variables with p-values less than 0.25 were included in the multivariable logistic regression. Finally, variables which had significant associations were identified at p value <0.05 and Adjusted OR with 95% CI was determined to see the strength of the associations.
The Hosmer and Lemeshow test was used to check the fitness of the model. For qualitative data, in-depth interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated to English. After reading the text several times, codes were given and related codes were categorized. Then, categories were merged to form themes. Finally, the findings were presented in narrations and triangulated with quantitative findings.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Epidemiological Data Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were checked for inconsistencies and incompleteness before being edited, coded, and entered into the epi data. The data was then exported to SPSS Windows version 23 statistical software. Descriptive statistics were computed to determine the frequency and percentage of dependent and independent variables. Indeed, binary logistic regression analysis was also conducted to obtain the odds ratio and the confidence interval of statistical associations. Then, multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out based on the result of binary logistic regression analysis that had a statistically significant association. The strength of statistical associations was measured by adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bivariate and Multivariate Analysis of Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The questionnaires were checked for completeness, coded and entered into EPI Data version 3.1software and then exported to SPSS windows version 23 for analysis. Bivariate analysis was used primarily to check variables which have an association with the dependent variable individually. Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit test was checked, and it was found to be 0.989 on the final model. Variables which were found to have an association with the dependent variable at a P-value of < 0.2 were then entered into multivariable logistic regression for controlling the possible effect of confounders and finally the variables which have significant association were identified based on AOR, with 95%Confidence Interval (CI) and P-value < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Psychometric Validation of HM-PRO Instrument

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data entry was performed in Microsoft Excel and 20% entries were randomly selected for cross-validation by a reviewer. Cleaning, coding, and analysis of the data were performed using SPSS Windows version 23. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated to measure the internal consistency of the scales and subscales of the HM-PRO, which is the average inter-item correlation (Cronbach, 1951 (link); Frost et al., 2007 (link); Tavakol and Dennick, 2011 (link); Devellis, 2016 ). The alpha value reflects the extents to which the instrument measures the concept consistently. Cronbach’s alpha value greater than 0.7 was taken as reliable (Tavakol and Dennick, 2011 (link)). Spearman’s rank correlation was also calculated to assess the inter-item and item-total partial correlation. A moderate correlation (rs = 0.2) is expected between items (Streiner and Norman, 2003 ). Intra-class correlation was calculated to assess the level of agreement between scores from the first assessment (test) and after 7 days (re-test). An ICC value of 1 means that 100% variability is because of difference between patients, and the ICC value of 0 means that all variability is due to within-patient variability and error (Studenic et al., 2016 (link)). A 2-way mixed-effects, absolute agreement, multiple raters measurement type of ICC was chosen as per McGraw and Wong convention (Mcgraw and Wong, 1996 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!