The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Amicon spin column

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany

Amicon spin columns are laboratory filtration devices used for the concentration and purification of macromolecules, such as proteins, nucleic acids, and other biomolecules. These columns contain a semi-permeable membrane that allows the passage of smaller molecules while retaining the larger target molecules. The columns are designed to be used in a centrifuge, which applies centrifugal force to facilitate the separation and concentration of the desired molecules.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using amicon spin column

1

Quantifying Transduction Efficiency and BMP2 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transduction efficiency Ad-GFP was assessed by the presence of the fluorescent GFP protein in cells using a fluorescence Axio Observer D1 microscope with an AxioCam HRc camera (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) and by flow cytometry on a CyFlow ML (Partec, Tsuchiura, Japan).
Transduction efficiency Ad-BMP2 was assessed by BMP2 gene expression by RT-PCR and BMP-2 protein production by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
RT-PCR was carried out in a BioRad iQ cycler thermal cycler (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) using SYBR Green I intercalating dye (Eurogen, Moscow, Russia). Total RNA was extracted from the cells using the RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using the RevertAid Kit (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany). The expression levels of the analyzed gene were normalized to the average values of the reference genes Gapdh and Actβ.
To evaluate the production of the BMP-2 protein by MSCs, the culture medium was collected every 3 days and stored at −80 °C. Then, all fractions were combined and concentrated using a 3 kDa Amicon spin column (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The protein was analyzed by ELISA using a Quantikine Elisa kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The measurements were performed on an xMark plate spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microscale Thermophoresis of Metal-Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microscale thermophoresis (MST) was performed with the Monolith NT.LabelFree instrument (NanoTemper Technologies, Munich, Germany) [24 (link),25 (link)]. To remove residual metal ions, purified HRDs were incubated with 5 mM EDTA for 30 min before buffer exchange into Chelex (Biorad, Gladesville, NSW, Australia) treated Milli-Q water using a 3 kDa cutoff Amicon spin column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Protein stocks were prepared at 40 µM (SlD26) or 80 µM (AtD90) in the appropriate MST buffer; either 20 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 for NiCl2 assays, or 20 mM bis-Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 for all other metal salts. A fifteen step, two-fold dilution series of each metal salt (and a no metal control) in the respective MST buffer with a top concentration of 20 mM was also prepared. Protein and metal salt solutions were combined in a 1:1 ratio (10 µL of each) in a 0.2 mL tube and mixed by gentle pipetting before incubation for 30 min at room temperature. The samples were then loaded into Monolith NT Standard Treated capillaries (NanoTemper Technologies) via capillary action. Thermophoresis was monitored by intrinsic fluorescence at 25 °C with experiments performed at 20% LED power and 40% MST IR laser power. Data from three independent experiments were analyzed using the signal from Thermophoresis + T-jump employing the NT.Analysis software version 1.5.41 (NanoTemper Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Identification of MERS-CoV S1-Interacting Host Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Membrane proteins from
pcDNA–MERS-CoV–S1–V5–transfected BEAS2B cells were
immunoprecipitated with mAb against V5 (ThermoFisher Scientific, R96025) and
Sepharose A/G beads (ThermoFisher Scientific). In parallel, the membrane
proteins from the BEAS2B cells were immunoprecipitated with purified
MERS-CoV–S1–FLAG protein, anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Sigma, F1804),
and Sepharose A/G beads (ThermoFisher Scientific). Pulled down proteins reactive
to anti-V5 beads were washed and incubated with 0.1 m glycine, pH 3.5,
and those reactive to anti-FLAG M2 beads were eluted in 3× FLAG peptide
solution (Sigma, 150 ng/μl final concentration). Eluted samples were
spin-dialyzed in Amicon spin column with 10-kDa cutoff (Millipore) and separated
by SDS-PAGE, stained with SilverQuest kit (ThermoFisher Scientific). The gel
fragment was excised for LC-MS/MS analysis carried out in the Center for Genomic
Sciences, University of Hong Kong. MS/MS data were searched against all
mammalian protein databases in NCBI and Swiss-Prot. The protein was identified
as GRP78 with significant hits over different domains of the sequence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

CHIKV Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression screening was carried out in Vero cells by transduction of ChAdOx1 sCHIKV, using a MOI = 10. Three days after transduction, the cells and supernatants were harvested, the supernatant was concentrated with a 100 kDa Amicon® spin column (Millipore UK, LTD). The 5x concentrated fraction, the non-concentrated fraction (input) and flow through fraction was also recovered. Cells and supernatants samples were boiled at 100 °C for five minutes in Laemli buffer. Equal amounts of total cell extract and cell supernatants were resolved by SDS/PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. Blots were blocked with 1X PBS-Tween- 5% milk and incubated with an anti-CHIKV E1 antibody (AZ 1253, Aalto BioReagents, Dublin, Ireland) at 1:500 dilution, and anti-CHIKV envelope seropositive mice sera (1:500), followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000). Chemiluminescence (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA, USA) was visualised using the ChemiDoc SRS device (BioRad, Watford H., UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Type I Interferon Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total amounts of IFN-α/β in cell supernatants were measured by using 293T cells stably expressing the firefly luciferase gene under the control of the mouse Mx1 promoter (Mx1-luc reporter cells) [76 (link)]. Briefly, cell supernatants were harvested and virus particles were removed with Amicon spin columns with a cutoff of 100 kDa (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Mx1-luc reporter cells were seeded into 96-well plates in sextuplicates and were treated 24 hours later with filtered supernatants diluted 1:10 in DMEM-5% FCS. At 16 hours post incubation, cells were lysed in passive lysis buffer (Promega), and luminescence was measured with a microplate reader (Tecan). The assay sensitivity was determined by a standard curve.
For reporter assays, HEK293 cells were plated in 96-well plates 24 hours prior to transfection. Firefly reporter and Renilla transfection control were transfected using polyethylenimine (PEI, Polysciences) in sextuplicates for untreated and treated conditions. In 24 hours cells were stimulated for 16 hours with corresponding inducer and harvested in passive lysis buffer (Promega). Luminescence of Firefly and Renilla luciferases was measured using dual-luciferase-reporter assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions in a microplate reader (Tecan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Generation of HA-tagged Fusion Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To generate HA-tagged fusion proteins, each DNA fragment encoding ANK1-F1 (aa 1–318), ANK1-F2 (aa 250–568), ANK1-F3 (aa 500–827), or the last three extracellular loops of band 3 (band 3-L4, L5, L6) containing a HA tag at the C terminal was amplified from the cDNA (reversely transcribed by the human reticulocyte mRNA) using six respective reverse primers which introduced the HA tag nucleotide sequence and six respective forward primers listed in Table S3. PCR products were cloned into the BamHI and XhoI sites of pET30a or pGEX-6P-1 vector. The pET30a plasmids carrying ANK1-F1, -F2, -F3 gene fragments and the pGEX-6P-1 plasmids carrying band 3-L4, L5, L6 gene fragments were transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS cells for expression. Protein expression was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG for 7 h at 37 °C. Soluble proteins were purified by Talen Biotech as described previously (62 (link)). Additionally, the buffer of eluted proteins was exchanged to PBS using 10 kDa Amicon spin columns (Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Recombinant Expression and Purification of Plasmodium Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gene sequences of pfgama and pvgama were taken from PlasmoDB (http://plasmodb.org; accession no. PF3D7_0828800 and PVX_088910). The codon-optimized pfgama-tr3 (aa 500–715) and pvgama-f2 (aa 345–589) genes (Table S2) both with a Flag tag at the 3′ end were generated by DNA synthesis and cloned into BamH1/Xho1 sites of pET30a vector (Talen Biotech). E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS cells bearing these recombinant plasmids were grown in Luria–Bertani broth at 37 °C. The cells were induced at the optical density at 600 nm of 0.4 to 0.6 by adding 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and allowed to proceed for 7 h at 25 °C. Expression of Trx-His tag protein of empty pET32a vector was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG for 20 h at 16 °C. Soluble proteins were purified by Talen Biotech as described previously (59 (link)) with a slight modification using NPI10 (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) as purification buffer. Additionally, the buffer of eluted proteins was exchanged to PBS using 10 kDa Amicon spin columns (Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!