The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using western lightning plus ecl solution

1

Immunoblotting for Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation for SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis were performed as described previously [38 (link)]. A total of 6, 10 or 14 µg cellular protein was applied per lane. Polyclonal sera against σS, σFliA and CsgD (custom-made by Pineda-Antikörper-Service, Berlin) or a monoclonal antibody against Gfp (Roche), goat anti-rabbit (Amersham™, GE Healthcare) and donkey anti-mouse (Pierce®, Thermo Scientific) IgG peroxidase conjugate and Western Lightning Plus ECL solution (Perkin Elmer) were used. Densitometric quantification of proteins on blots was performed using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blotting of Cultured EOCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultured EOCs were harvested with a cell lysis buffer (HEPES 10 nM pH 7.4, Na pyrophosphate 50 nM, NaF 50 nM, Na2 EDTA 5 nM, EGTA 5 nM, Triton X-100 0.5%, Na3VO4 2 nM, PMSF 1 nM, leupeptin 1 μg/ml, aprotinin 1 μg/ml). Protein levels were quantified by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). The appropriate volume of SDS loading buffer (375 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 6% SDS, 48% glycerol, 9% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.03% bromophenol blue) was added to protein samples, heated for 5 min at 100 °C and loaded into 8% polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were transferred overnight to a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad). The membrane was blocked for 1 hour at room temperature with blocking buffer (5% non-fat dry milk in TBS-T (50 mM Tris pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, Tween-20 0.05%)) and then incubated overnight with the appropriate primary antibodies. The membrane was washed 3 times with TBS-T and incubated with the appropriate HRP secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse). Next the membrane was incubated with a western lightning plus-ECL solution (Perkin Elmer). The chemiluminescence was measured using Chemidoc XRS + system (Bio-Rad) and quantified by densitometry using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Quantification and Immunoblotting Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche). Fifteen μg of protein were separated on 10–15% polyacrylamide SDS gels and electrotransferred onto PVDF membranes (Biorad) using wet tank sandwich method. Membranes were blocked and probed with the respective primary antibody: anti-YY1 (1:5000, rabbit monoclonal IgG EPR4652: ab109237; Abcam), anti-YY1 (1:5000, mouse monoclonal IgG1 H10: sc7341; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-YY1 (1:5000, rabbit polyclonal IgG H414: sc1703; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-MYC (1:10000, rabbit monoclonal IgG Y69: ab32072; Abcam), anti-GAPDH (1:10000, mouse monoclonal IgG1 6C5: ab8245; Abcam), anti-histone H3 (1:1000, rabbit polyclonal IgG: #9715; Cell Signaling). Secondary antibodies were purchased from GE Healthcare Life Sciences and used at 1:10000 (anti-mouse IgG HRP-linked NXA931, anti-rabbit IgG HRP-linked NA934). Protein bands were detected by chemiluminescence (Western lightning Plus ECL Solution; Perkin Elmer) in the Advanced Fluorescence Imager machine (Intas) and protein signal quantification was performed by densitometry analysis using ImageJ software. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was determined by Microsoft Excel software (Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2010).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunoblotting Analysis of Mouse Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein extraction and immunoblots, mouse tissues or organoids were lysed on ice in RIPA lysis buffer (50mM Tris HCl pH 7,4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0,25% sodium deoxycholate) containing complete protease inhibitors (Roche). For organoids beforehand, lysis Matrigel was removed using cell recovery solution (Corning) as described in manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were then boiled for 10 min and cleared by centrifugation. Equal amounts of lysate protein were separated performing SDS-PAGE. Western blotting was performed with anti HA mouse primary antibody (Roche) and anti actin rabbit primary antibody (SIGMA) and then with secondary anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma and Amersham Biosciences, respectively). Visualization was achieved with the Western Lightning Plus-ECL solution (PerkinElmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PRL-3 Protein Detection by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed on ice in HNTG buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 5 mM EGTA and 1% Triton X-100) containing complete protease inhibitors (Roche). Equal amounts of lysate protein were separated by performing SDS-PAGE. Western blotting was performed with different antibodies against PRL-3 and with secondary anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma and Amersham Biosciences, respectively). Visualization was achieved with the Western Lightning Plus-ECL solution (Perkin Elmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of CAR T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total lysates were extracted from CAR T cells on day 9 of production using RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher). Protein concentrations were determined by BCA assay (Thermo-Fisher). Samples were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and separated proteins transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using an iBlot2 transfer system (Thermo Fisher). Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk-TBS and incubated with primary antibodies against BATF3, pc-Jun (S73), c-Jun, and β-actin (see Supplementary Table S3). Membranes were washed and developed using species-specific secondary anti-IgG/HRP antibodies (R&D Systems) and Western Lightning Plus-ECL solution (PerkinElmer). Bands were visualized on an iBright 1500 imaging system (Thermo).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein extraction and western blot analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed in PBS and collected by centrifugation. The cell pellet was resuspended in RIPA lysis buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; 0.5 mM EDTA; 0.1% SDS; 1% Triton X-100; 1% deoxycholate) freshly supplemented with 10 mM NaF, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, leupeptin (5 µg/mL) and aprotinin (10 µg/mL). Following incubation on ice for 30 min, the extracts were centrifuged and equal amounts of proteins contained in the supernatant were further analyzed. Western blotting was performed by SDS-PAGE and semi-dry transfer to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. After incubation with primary and secondary peroxidase-coupled antibodies, proteins were detected using Western-Lightning Plus-ECL solutions (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the instructions given by the manufacturer. All bands were visualized using the ChemiDocTM XRS+ System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany). Relative intensity ratios were calculated using the Bio-Rad Image Lab-software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of R-loop Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated from 2.5 × 107 cells using the High Pure PCR template preparation kit (Roche). A 1.1-μg amount of DNA was then either treated with 10 U recombinant E. coli RNase H (NEB) or double-distilled water (ddH2O) in 1× RNase H buffer (2 h, 37°C). All samples were further incubated with 10 μg RNase A (Thermo Fisher) (1 h, 37°C) in a final concentration of 500 mM NaCl. The DNA samples were spotted on a Hybond N+ membrane (GE Healthcare) using a dot blot apparatus in a 2-fold serial reduction and cross-linked with UV (0.12 J). To quantify R-loop formation, the membrane was blocked in 5% milk/PBS (overnight, 4°C). A 1-μg/ml concentration of S9.6 antibody (Merck Millipore) in 0.1% Tween/PBS was then incubated with the membrane (1 h, RT). After three washes with 50 ml 0.2% Tween/PBS, the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Dianova) (1:20,000) (1 h, RT). After three washes with 50 ml 0.2% Tween/PBS, the HRP signal was developed with Western Lightning Plus-ECL solutions (PerkinElmer) and imaged using an iBright imaging system (Thermo Fisher). iBright Analysis software was used for quantification of signals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunoblot Analysis of Protein Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction was done from homogenized tissues, re-suspended in 2 × volumes of high salt buffer (HSB) (Tillmann et al. 2015 ). Protein extraction from protoplasts was done after resuspension of cells to 60 μl HSB (Hahn et al. 2011 (link)). The samples were subsequently centrifuged for 5 min at 14,000 rpm and 4 °C. The supernatant was supplemented with 4 × SDS loading buffer and boiled at 95 °C for 5 min. Extracts were separated on 10 or 12% SDS–polyacrylamide gels. For immunoblot analysis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Protran nitrocellulose transfer membrane; Whatman) and protein signals were detected using chemiluminescence following the manufacturer’s protocol (Western Lightning Plus ECL solutions; Perkin-Elmer). The antibodies used were GFP (Roche), hemagglutinin tag (HA; Covance), and actin (Sigma-Aldrich). Antibodies used for detection of HsfA1a have been previously described (Lyck et al. 1997 (link)). Immunosignals were visualized with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–coupled secondary antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich) and recorded in a ChemoStar ECL imager (INTAS, Göttingen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!