The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using enhanced chemoluminescence

1

Nrg1 Protein Detection in Mouse Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P3/P8 mouse cortices were lysed in Pierce RIPA buffer (Thermo Scientific) containing Complete protease inhibitors (Roche) and analyzed for protein content using Bradford reagent. A total of 20 μg of protein extract was separated on a NuPAGE 3%–7% Tris-Acetate gel (Life Technologies) and blotted onto nitrocellulose. Immunoblotting was performed using Abs against Nrg1-type1 (1:1,000 dilution; ab27303, Abcam) and β-actin (1:500; ab8226, Abcam). Immunoreactive bands were detected by enhanced chemoluminescence (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CD4+ T Cell Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed as described previously [18 (link)]. Cells were FACS-sorted based on SSC/FSC scattering and CD4+ expression using the ARIA II from Benson Dickinson. Sorted CD4+ T cells were lysed in Laemmli buffer (0.12M Tris-HCL, pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol) and boiled for 5 minutes, and the protein concentration was determined. Equal amounts of sample were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore), and probed with the respective antibodies. Immune complexes were detected using enhanced chemoluminescence (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Intestinal Brush Border Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BBs were purified from the entire length of the small intestine as previously described (Mooseker et al. 1978) with modifications detailed in (Hegan et al. 2012 (link)). WT and DM BBs were isolated at the same time and the compositional data reported here was confirmed through analysis of 3 different BB preparations made from pairs of age-matched WT and DM mice. Whole mucosal gel samples were prepared by trichloroacetic acid precipitation of mucosal homogenates as described in [Hegan et al. 2012 (link)]. For immunoblot analysis, SDS sample buffer was added to whole mucosal homogenates and isolated BBs (equal protein for each genotype) and then electrophoresed on 5–20% gradient gels. The gels were then electo-transferred to Hybond nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) for immunoblot analysis. Horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies (Pierce, Rockford, IL) were visualized by Enhanced Chemo Luminescence (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) under denaturing conditions (8% and 12% SDS-PAGE), according to the method of Laemmli [16 (link)]. We used a Mini-Protean 3 electrophoresis cell for the separation of proteins (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA, USA). Proteins were electrophoresed at 120 V, and gels stained with 0.25% Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). Pre-stained standards (Fermentas, Burlington, Ontario, CA) were used for estimating the molecular weight of proteins in each sample. Following electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to Hybond-C Extra nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare). We detected β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase and 1,3-β-D-glucan synthase by incubating membranes with the relevant specific murine antibodies (1 mg/mL) overnight. Membranes were then incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer). The reaction was revealed using the peroxidase substrate ECL (Enhanced Chemo-Luminescence, GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Expression Quantification by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SDS PAGE and Western blotting were performed as previously described [46 (link)]. Blots were probed with the following Abs: mouse anti-ABCB1 (anti-C219 mouse monoclonal Ab; Calbiochem1:100), anti-MGMT (Millipore 1:100), rabbit anti-BCL2 (Cell Signaling clone 50E3 1:1000), rabbit anti BCL2A1 (Cell Signaling 1:1000), Rabbit anti-MCL1 (Santa Cruz 1:500) and either mouse anti-GAPDH (Sigma) or rabbit anti-β-tubulin (Cell Signalling Technology) 1:1000 as loading controls. All primary Abs were detected using goat anti-mouse/rabbit IgG HRP-linked secondary Ab (Cell Signalling Technology 1:2000) and enhanced chemoluminescence (GE Health Care Life Science) performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed and proteins were collected with RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.2, 5 mM EDTA, Phosphatase and Protease Inhibitor Cocktail [Sigma-Aldrich]). Protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay reagent (Pierce). Equal amount of protein was analyzed on SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (0.22 μm, Millipore). Membranes were then incubated at room temperature for 1 h in blocking buffer (5% low-fat milk powder in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS)), and after incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody were incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Immunoreactive bands detection was carried out using the enhancedchemoluminescence (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer's instructions. When indicated, IRDye secondary antibodies were used and revealed using Odyssey ® SA (Licor). We used ImageJ software to quantify western blot bands. Relative densitometry is expressed as the mean ± SD of 5 different experiments. t test: *P < 0.05, **P< 0.01, ***P< 0.001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!