The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Digoxigenin 11 utp

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

Digoxigenin-11-UTP is a modified nucleotide that is commonly used as a molecular marker or label in various laboratory techniques, such as in situ hybridization, Northern blotting, and immunoassays. It serves as a detection system for the identification and localization of specific nucleic acid sequences within biological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using digoxigenin 11 utp

1

In Vitro Synthesis and Translation of Capped, Labeled RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synthesis of capped RNA in vitro was accomplished with SP6 or T7 RNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), and m7G(5′)ppp(5′)G RNA cap analog (New England Biolabs) as described previously [9 (link)]. Synthetic RNA incorporating fluorescent or DIG labels were made using ribonucleotides mixed with ChromaTide® Alexa Fluor® 488-5-UTP- (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or Digoxigenin-11-UTP- (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) during in vitro transcription as per manufacturers’ protocol. The free labels were removed by Sephadex G-50 quick spin columns (Sigma-Aldrich).
In vitro translation was carried out using the Flexi® Rabbit reticulocyte lysate and the nonradioactive FluoroTect™ GreenLys in vitro translation labeling as per the manufacturer’s protocol (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). In brief, approximately 100–200 ng RNA transcripts were used in a 15 μL-reaction with indicated recombinant RuV proteins. The results were resolved on 10 or 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and visualized using a Typhoon 9400 Imager (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Data analysis was accomplished with ImageQuant software (GE Healthcare Life Sciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization in Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS with 0.1% Tween-20 (PFA) at 4°C overnight and stored in 100% methanol at −20°C until required. All whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) was carried out according to standard protocols (Lauter et al. 2011 ). Antisense probes for hnrnpul1, hnrnpul1l, scxa, hand2, tbx5, foxd3, and sox10 were produced by in vitro transcription using T7 polymerase (Roche), in the presence of digoxigenin-11-UTP (Sigma), from PCR fragments amplified from embryonic zebrafish cDNA (Supplementary Table 4). Antisense probes for gli3 and col1a1a were a gift from Peng Huang and produced from plasmid clones. Images were taken on a Zeiss Stemi SV 11 microscope with a Zeiss Axiocam HRc camera. Area and length measurements were completed in ImageJ using the line and measure tools or Zen Blue (Zeiss) using the line tool. Confocal images were collected on a Zeiss LSM700 confocal microscope and assembled in ImageJ and Adobe Photoshop.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cloning and Probing of Vertebrate TH and TPH Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following the general formatting of gene symbols, chicken genes will be abbreviated with upper‐case letters (e.g., TH1), while those in Xenopus and zebrafish will be abbreviated with lower‐case letters (e.g., th1). In order to refer to the homologous genes throughout the three species or throughout vertebrates, we will use upper‐case (e.g., TH1) in this article.
Chicken and Xenopus TH and TPH genes were cloned into pCRII Vector (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) or StrataClone (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), after PCR amplification of the transcripts using specific primers (Table 2). Zebrafish th2 and tph1a had already been used in previous publications (Bellipanni, Rink, & Bally‐Cuif, 2002; Yamamoto et al., 2010, 2011). Antisense and sense RNA probes were synthesized by in vitro transcription using T3, T7, or Sp6 RNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI) and labeled with fluorescein‐12‐UTP or digoxigenin‐11‐UTP (Sigma‐Aldrich Co. LLC./Roche). Probes were purified using Nucleospin RNA clean‐UP kit (Macherey‐Nagel, Hoerdt, France) and analyzed by gel electrophoresis to confirm the size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In vitro Synthesis of DIG-Labeled Riboprobes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detection of specific gene transcripts were performed as previously described in Brown et al., 2005 (link). Probes against Nkx3-2, Rab28, Bod1l and Gli3 were amplified from cDNA from wildtype C57BL/6NJ mouse embryos (Supplementary file 5). Amplified fragments were cloned into pJET1.2/blunt plasmid backbones in both sense and anti-sense orientations using the CloneJET PCR Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany) and confirmed by Sanger sequencing using the included forward and reverse primers. Probe plasmids have also been deposited with Addgene. In vitro transcription from the T7 promoter was performed using the MAXIscript T7 in vitro Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with Digoxigenin-11-UTP (Sigma-Aldrich) (MPI Tübingen), or with T7 RNA polymerase (Promega) in the presence of DIG RNA labeling mix (Roche) (University of Calgary). Following TURBO DNase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) digestion, probes were cleaned using SigmaSpin Sequencing Reaction Clean-Up columns (Sigma-Aldrich) (MPI Tübingen), or using Illustra MicroSpin G-50 columns (GE Healthcare) (University of Calgary). During testing of probe designs, sense controls were used in parallel reactions to establish background non-specific binding.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In-situ Analysis of Viral RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BMV RNA3-Insitu-L/R primer pairs (Additional file 3: Table S2) were used in PCR for probe preparation to amplify a 362-bp of the RNA3 of BMV. The PCR probe was labeled with Digoxigenin-11-UTP (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC, Mo, USA). Long’s protocol (http://www.its.caltech.edu/~plantlab/protocols/insitu.pdf) was used for tissue preparation. Robot GenePaint system (Tecan) was used for pre-hybridization, hybridization, and washing [59 ]. The section was imaged using the Nikon Eclipse TE 300 (Nikon Inc. NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Vascular Remodeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dihydroethidium (DHE), Terminal Transferase from Calf Thymus (TdT), Digoxigenin-11-UTP, Anti-Digoxigenin-Rhodamine Fab fragments, phenylephrine, Acetylcholine, Haematoxylin, Eosin, Oil Red O, and other fine chemicals were purchased from Sigma (Buchs, Switzerland). Primary antibodies including F4/80, α-smooth muscle actin, Von Willebrand factor, appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488/546 and Hoechst were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fluorescent Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For fluorescent whole mount in situ hybridization (FISH), we followed the protocol outlined in Cole and Arnone, 2009 (link); Perillo et al., 2016 (link). Signal was developed with fluorophore-conjugated tyramide (Perkin Elmer, Cat. #:NEL752001KT; RRID:AB_2572409). Labeled probes were transcribed from linearized DNA using digoxigenin-11-UTP (Sigma Aldrich, Cat. #:11277073910), or labeled with DNP (Mirus Bio, Cat. #:MIR3825) following kit instructions. Probes were synthesized using primers in Supplementary file 3. 20 to 40 samples were imaged with a Zeiss 800 confocal microscope from the Brown University Leduc Bioimaging Core Facility (RRID:SCR_017861).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS with 0.1% Tween-20 (PFA) at 4°C overnight and stored in 100% methanol at -20°C until required. All whole-mount in situ hybridisation was carried out according to standard protocols (Lauter et al., 2011) . Antisense probes for hnrnpul1, hnrnpul1l, scxa, hand2, tbx5, foxd3 and sox10 were produced by in vitro transcription using T7 polymerase (Roche), in the presence of digoxigenin-11-UTP (Sigma), from PCR fragments amplified from embryonic zebrafish cDNA (Table S3). Antisense probes for gli3 and col1a1a were a gift from Peng Huang and produced from plasmid clones.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!