The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

842 protocols using spss statistics version 19

1

Analyzing Gut Microbiome and SCFA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U tests (IBM SPSS Statistics version 19.0 software) were performed to analyze the differences between SCFA concentrations and Chao1 and Shannon indexes. The heatmap panel was used to display the Spearman correlation coefficients between bacteria (genus level) and SCFAs. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by least significant difference (LSD) tests (IBM SPSS Statistics version 19.0 software) and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to analyze the KEGG differences in the different groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Psoriasin Levels Analysis Approach

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The normality of distribution of psoriasin levels was determined by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Due to non-normal distribution of the data, non parametric test (Mann–Whitney U test) was used to compare psoriasin levels. Spearman’s rank correlations were calculated to determine the correlation between psoriasin levels and various clinical and laboratory parameters. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 19. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to assess the sensitivity and specificity (IBM SPSS Statistics Version 19).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Standardized Patient Evaluation of Medical Interviews

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The evaluation form was constructed based on the Calgary-Cambridge Guide to the Medical Interview: Communication Process. The focus of the analysis was on the initiation stage of the medical interview, includeing the identification of reasons for consultation. The rating form included three tasks for agenda setting; these tasks were rated as yes (1) or no (0) (Appendix 1). Two experienced standardized patients were trained as raters for 2 hours. The video recordings were independently reviewed and scored using the evaluation checklist. If the two raters disagreed in their judgment of a medical student’s performance, the two communication educators reviewed and scored the interview in order to gain additional insight and clarity.
IBM SPSS Statistics version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA) was used for descriptive statistics; the data are shown as the mean and standard deviation for the sum of all task items, as well as frequencies and percentages for categorical data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Demographic Factors in PAX Discontinuation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine the relationship between the demographic variables and the discontinuation of PAX treatment, multi-logistic regression analysis was conducted. For comparison of the discontinuation rates between MDD patients and PD patients, the chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test (when data were sparse) was carried out. For comparison of the differences of demographic data between MDD patients and PD patients, the Student’s t-test, Welch’s t-test, and chi-square test, were used. Multilogistic regression analysis, chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, Welch’s t-test, and Student’s t-test were conducted with Dr SPSS II for Windows (SPSS Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and IBM SPSS statistics version 19.0 (Japan IBM, Tokyo, Japan). P-values of <0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Intravitreal Infusion IOP Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software package IBM SPSS Statistics version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Somers, NY, USA). MANOVA was used to compare the IOP values of groups A, B, C and D. The correlation of IOP values before removal of needle and the scores of reflux in all intravitreal infusion eyes were calculated using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Statistical significance was considered when p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. Student’s t-test was used to determine significant differences. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM-SPSS Statistics version 19.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Age-Stratified Analysis of Renal Risk Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baseline characteristics were compared among patients categorized by age groups and admission eGFR levels. We expressed continuous variables as means ± standard deviation or medians (interquartile range, IQR), as appropriate, and reported categorical variables as counts and percentages. The correlation of eGFR with age was tested by Pearson correlation test. Hazard ratios (HRs) were presented with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on the results of Cox proportional hazards regression models, which we used to investigate the risk effect of RRF on the outcome events in different age groups. The univariate and multivariate models were generated sequentially to determine the successive influence of potential confounders on the relative risk for outcomes by RRF after stratification by age group. We also employed a single Cox regression model including age group (1 reference variable and 2 indicator variables), RRF, the interaction terms for RRF and age group, and other covariates, to further confirm whether the age-related changes in the association of RRF with clinical outcomes existed. Two-sided P values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. We performed all the statistical analyses with the use of SPSS Statistics (version 19.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences between the control and treatment groups were analyzed by analysis of variance, followed by Duncan's multiple range test. SPSS Statistics version 19.0 was used for statistical analysis. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Protein Expression in Liver Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The StatLight–2000(C) program (Yukms corp., Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan) was used for the statistical analysis of the results of in vivo and in vitro experiments. ProteinPilot™ 2.0 Software was employed for the statistical analysis of the quantitative changes of protein expression in mice HCCs and CNPY2kn Huh7 and HepG2 human liver cancer cells. First, the F test was used for the evaluation of the significance of differences between mean values. If non-homogeneous, the results were then analyzed with the Welch test, and if homogenous, with the Student’s t-test (two-sided) using SPSS statistics version 19.0. (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance of associations between CNPY2 staining and various clinicopathological variables was evaluated using chi-square and Fisher’s tests. Survival curves were calculated from the day of surgery to relapse or death or to the last follow-up using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences in overall survival curves were assessed with the Log rank test. In all applied analyses, p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Univariate Cox proportional hazard model analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and to determine associations between CNPY2 overexpression and disease-specific mortality.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Autophagy Biomarkers in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed by SPSS Statistics, version 19.0 software (SPSS, Inc, Armonk, NY). All graphs were generated by GraphPad Prism version 5.00 (GraphPad Software, San Diego,CA USA). All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Differences in characteristics between the AIS patients and controls were evaluated using the Student’s t-test for continuous variables or Chi square test for dischotomous variables. The Mann–Whitney U Test was used to compare the autophagy biomarkers between the AIS patients and controls. Differences in good outcome group and poor outcome group assessed by the improvement in NIHSS were evualted by the Student’s t-test. Pearson’s correlation test was used to assess the linear dependence between autophagy biomarkers and infarct volume, NIHSS and mRS. P <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!