The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Eclipse aaa column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Eclipse AAA column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of analytes. It features a spherical silica-based stationary phase with a high surface area and a proprietary bonding chemistry. The Eclipse AAA column is suitable for a variety of applications, including the analysis of amino acids, peptides, and other biomolecules.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using eclipse aaa column

1

Quantifying Free Amino Acids in Mushroom Fruiting Bodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to Wang et al.’s study [29 (link)], the free amino acid content was detected for fruiting bodies. Initially, 0.5 g of fresh samples were crushed and extracted with 5 mL of 0.01 mol/L hydrochloric acid. The sample was then heated in a boiling water bath for 30 min, followed by 10 min of centrifugation at 24,200× g. After separating the supernatant, we added 2 mL of 0.01 mol/L hydrochloric acid, followed by 5 min of sonication. We centrifuged the mixture, combined it with a supernatant, and added solvent until the volume was 10 mL. Determination was performed using a 0.22 μm filter membrane. Analysis was performed using an Agilent 1100 liquid chromatograph (with VWD detector) (1100, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) containing a ZORBAX Eclipse AAA column (4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 μm). The HPLC conditions were as follows: mobile phase A: 40 mmol/L sodium dihydrogen phosphate (pH 7.8); mobile phase B: acetonitrile/methanol/water = 45/45/10; flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; UV detection wavelength, 338 nm (0 to 19 min), 266 nm (19.01 to 25 min); oven temperature: 40 °C; injection volume: 1 μL. Identification and quantification of each amino acid were conducted using a standard mixture of 17 amino acids (Sigma-Aldrich CN Inc., Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Intracellular Amino Acid Profiling in A. oryzae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For determination of the intracellular amino acids, A. oryzae was cultured in PDA medium containing different concentrations of ethanol. After 36 h of cultivation, the mycelia were harvested and freeze-dried overnight. Subsequently, 0.1 mg of mycelia was treated with liquid nitrogen grinding plus ultrasonic crushing. After that, the cell suspension was collected by centrifugation to remove the cell debris, and the supernatant was transferred for the amino acid assay by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; 1260 series, Agilent technology) after derivatization. The method for online pre-column derivatization was operated according to Agilent guidance, and orthophthalaldehyde (OPA) and 9-formic acid methyl ester of fluorine chlorine (FMOC) were selected as the derivatization agents. The column used for the HPLC analysis was a ZORBAX Eclipse-AAA column at a flow rate of 2 mL/min. The FMOC-derived amino acids were detected at 262 nm, whereas the OPA-derived amino acids were detected at 338 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analytical Methods for TMP and L-Tle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The substrate (TMP) was analyzed on a ZORBAX ECLIPSE AAA column (4.6 nm × 150 mm, 5 um), eluted with acetonitrile/0.01 mol⋅L–1 KH2PO4 in a volume ratio of 15:85 as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 ml⋅min–1 and identified at 215 nm.
L-Tle was determined on the same column, while the mobile phase was composed of phase A (5 g⋅L–1 anhydrous sodium acetate, 200 μl triethylamine, 4 ml tetrahydrofuran solution, pH 7.2) and phase B (5 g⋅L–1 anhydrous sodium acetate, 400 ml methanol and acetonitrile, pH 7.2). The 20 min pump procedure was programmed as follows: the mobile phase A is reduced from 90 to 44% in 0–12 min, then decreased to 0% in 2.5 min, held for 2.5 min, and then increased to 90% in 3 min. Other control conditions include column temperature (40°C), injection volume (10 μl), the UV detection (338 nm), and flow rate (1.0 ml⋅min–1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Amino Acids in Milk Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amino acids were quantified according to Maria and Federico (20 (link)). The procedure involved hydrolyzing the sample with a 6N HCl solution, followed by the extraction of total amino acids from freeze-dried milk fractions. Specifically, 1 mL of 6N HCl was introduced into a screw tube containing 40 mg of freeze-dried sample and incubated at 110°C for 24 h. The created acidic solution was neutralized by adding an equivalent amount of NaOH (6N). Subsequently, the mixture was then filtered through a 0.2 m syringe filter and kept at 4°C.
For analysis, 100 μL of the filtered sample solution was sequentially combined with 500 μL of borate buffer, 100 μL of O-phthalaldehyde, and 100 μL of FMOC (9-fluorenyl methyl chloroformate). After filtering via a 0.2 μm filter, the mixture was submitted to HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) on a Zorbax Eclipse AAA column. At a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min, a temperature of 40°C, and an injection volume of 20 μL, the HPLC analysis was performed. Principal amino acids were identified at 338 nm, whereas secondary amino acids, proline and hydroxyproline, were discovered at 262 nm. To estimate the amount of each amino acid, standard ranges were established using a combination of amino acids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC-based Amino Acid Analysis in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GABA and primary free amino acids were analyzed using HPLC after derivatization with o-phthalaldehyde / 9-fluorenyl-methyl chloroformate (OPA/FMOC). Briefly, 30 mg of lyophilized leaf tissue was extracted with 1mL of 5% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid. The supernatant was injected onto an Agilent 1100 HPLC and the column eluent was monitored using fluorescence at an excitation/emission wavelength of 340/450 nm, respectively. Online pre-column derivatization with OPA was performed using the autosampler. Separation was performed on a ZORBAX Eclipse-AAA column (4.6 x 150 mm) using the solvent systems A: 40 mM NaH2PO4 pH 7.8 and solvent B: Acetonitrile: Methanol: water (45:45:10, v/v/v) and a gradient program of 5% B to 100% B in 12 min. GABA standard was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (part number A2129), and primary free amino acids were quantified using standard calibration curves. All amino acid standards (Agilent part number 5061–3330) and derivatization reagents were obtained from Agilent, (part numbers borate buffer 5061–3339; OPA 5061–3335, and FMOC 5061–3337)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Amino Acid Quantification in Cellular Hydrolysates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were mixed with 2 mL of 6 M HCl (1% phenol added), and nitrogen was filled for 1 min. After hydrolyzing at 110 °C for 22 h, the mixture was supplemented to 2 mL and dried by nitrogen. After dissolving in 0.01 M HCl, the samples were filtered.
The amino acids were derivatized using an automatic on-line derivatization method of Agilent. The primary and secondary amino acids were reacted with phthalaldehyde (OPA) and fluorene methoxycarbonyl chloride (FMOC), respectively.
HPLC was used to determine the amino acids with an Agilent 1100 apparatus and a ZORBAX Eclipse AAA column (4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 μm). Sodium dihydrogen phosphate (40 mM, pH7.8) was used as the mobile phase A. The mobile phase B contained acetonitrile, methanol, and water (volume ratio 45:45:10). The gradient was 0% B (0 min), 0% B (1.9 min), 57% B (18 min), 100% B (18.6 min), 100% B (23 min), 0% B (23.2 min), and 0% B (27 min). The fluorescence detection (EX = 266 nm, EM = 305 nm) was used to the test of proline. The other amino acids were measured at 338 nm in ultraviolet detection. The amino acid standard (AAS-18, Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was used in the identification and quantification, and the results were expressed in mg/g cell dry weight (CDW).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Glutathione Amino Acids via HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following the methodology laid out by Dahl-Lassen and colleagues, HPLC (SYKAM, Korea) was utilized to determine the quantity of different amino acids present in glutathione samples (Dahl-Lassen et al., 2018 (link)). The volume-to-volume ratio of the mobile phase’s components was as follows: 60% acetonitrile, 20% methanol, and 20% formic acid. After dissolving 3 g of each sample in 25 mL of 6% hydrochloric acid (HCl) at a temperature of 150 °C for 3 h, the samples were then allowed to dry. Following the addition of 5 mL of sodium citrate (Na2C6H5O7) to the samples that had been dried at a pH of 2.2, the samples were filtered using a polypropylene filter. After that, 1 mL was taken out of the extracted form, and 200 μL of ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) or paraldehyde with a concentration of 5% was added to it. Two minutes were spent shaking the mixture well. The volume of the injection was 100 µL, and the flow rate was 0.8 mL/min. The ZORBAX Eclipse-AAA column that was utilized had an internal diameter of 3.5 µm, 4.6 × 150 mm, and a temperature of 25 °C. Fluorescence was used as the technique for determining the presence of glutathione (Ex = 445 nm, Em = 465 nm). All of the data were reported in terms of mg/100 g of dry weight (DW), and their values were presented in terms of the mean as well as the standard deviation of three separate observations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

UHPLC-MS/MS Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chromatographic separation was conducted on an Agilent 1290 UHPLC system, equipped with a ZORBAX Eclipse AAA column (4.6 × 150 mm, 1.5 μ). Gradient elution was achieved by the mobile phase, which consisted of water with 5 mM ammonium formate and 0.05% formic acid (A) and methanol (B), and performed with the following schedule: 2%–5% of B at 0–8 min, 5%–15% of B at 8–15 min, 15%–80% of B at 15–18 min, 80%–100% of B at 18–18.1 min, 100% B at 18.1–20 min, 100–2% of B at 20–20.1 min, and 2% B at 20.1–25 min. The column temperature was set at 40°C, and the flow rate was at 0.3 ml/min.
Quantitative analysis was carried out by Agilent 6460 QqQ mass spectrometer. After optimization, the flow rate of 11 L/min for sheath gas and electrospray ionization (ESI) conditions were run at positive ion mode with a capillary voltage of 4000 V, a nebulizer pressure of 40 psi, and 11 L/min and 325°C for drying gas. For getting a better limit of quantification (LOQ), dynamic multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode was adopted. LC‐MRM data were collected by Agilent Mass Hunter Workstation Data Acquisition (Version B.07.00) and processed by QqQ Quantitative Analysis software (Version B.06.00).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HPLC Fluorescence Detection of OPA Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC was performed using Agilent 1200 HPLC with G1321A FD, and Eclipse AAA column (4.6×150 mm, 5 µm) with an excitation wavelength (λex) of 340 nm and an emission wavelength (λem) of 455 nm, and a column temperature of 40°C. The derivative liquid was compounded as follows: 5 mg o-Phthalaldehyde was dissolved in 120 µL dehydrated ethanol, and then added to 1 mL borate buffer (0.2 mol/L, pH 9.2) and 10 µL β-mercaptoethanol. Mobile phase A consisted of sodium borate buffer, methanol, and tetrahydrofuran (in a ratio of 400:95:5), and mobile phase B consisted of sodium acetate buffer solution (pH 7.2) and methanol (in a ratio of 120:380). The gradient elution procedure was 0–10 minutes, B (0%–63%), 10–12 minutes, B (63%), 12–17 minutes, B (100%), 17–18 minutes, B (100%–0%), and 18–21 minutes, B (0%). The flow rate was 0.8 mL min−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Tryptophan Determination by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Trp levels were determined using a ZORBAX Eclipse AAA column (3.5 μm, 4.6 × 150 mm, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and isocratically eluted with a mobile phase containing 100 mM of zinc acetate and 3% of acetonitrile (pH adjusted to 4.2 with glacial acetic acid) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. 20 μl of biological sample or standard solutions was injected for Trp determination. Trp was detected by fluorescence (excitation wavelength: 254 nm and emission wavelength: 404 nm). The retention time of Trp was ~5 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!