The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 17.0 software for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 17.0 is a statistical analysis software package for Windows. It provides tools for data management, analysis, and presentation. The software is designed to help users handle a variety of data types and perform a range of statistical procedures, including descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, and predictive analytics.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

93 protocols using spss 17.0 software for windows

1

Comparative Analysis of Molecular Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 17.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc., USA). Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s HSD test to compare the differences among three or more groups. Student’s t test was used to compare the difference between two experimental groups. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the experiments were performed at least in duplicate, and their average values with standard deviations were used for statistical analysis with SPSS 17.0 software for Windows (SPSS Statistics Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s honestly significant differences (HSD) test were used to determine the significant differences of data at a 95% confidence interval.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Contrast Sensitivity in Dominant and Non-dominant Eyes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For statistical analysis, SPSS 17.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used. Paired samples t-test was used to compare contrast sensitivity values of the dominant and nondominant eyes. P values lower than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Bacterial Reduction Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collected data (CFU counts) were statistically analyzed by SPSS 17.0 software for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Shapiro-Wilk`s test showed that the distribution of the variables studied deviated from normality. Therefore, the data were transformed to Log10. The intragroup quantitative analysis compared the bacterial reduction in three moments: from S1 to S2; from S1 to S3 and from S2 to S3, using the Wilcoxon paired test. The data for the quantitative comparisons among groups were obtained both by means of the absolute count in S1, S2 and S3, as well as by the analysis of percentage reduction of the bacterial load from S1 to S2 and S2 to S3, using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post-hoc test. The level of significance was set at 0.05 (P<0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the experiments were performed at least in duplicate, and their average values with standard deviations were used for statistical analysis with SPSS 17.0 software for Windows (SPSS Statistics Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s honestly significant differences (HSD) test were used to determine the significant differences of data at a 95% confidence interval.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Measurement data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Grouped data were expressed as a relative number. Group comparison was carried out using analysis of variance and the Q test. The significance level was α = 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Correlation of miR-155 with Clinical Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (quartile). Multiple comparisons were calculated by nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction for sub-analyses. Statistical significance between the two groups was determined by the Mann-Whitney U-test. The correlation between the miR-155 levels and clinical parameters was examined using Spearman’s rank correlation. All statistical tests were two-tailed. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isoflurane Anesthesia Effects on Vital Signs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD. Paired t-tests were used to examine the changes in blood pressure, heart rate and SaO2 within the isoflurane-treated group before induction, during induction and 1 hour after anesthesia. Blood pressure, heart rate, SaO2 and metabolite changes between the control group and isoflurane-treated group were analyzed by independent sample t-tests. Correlation studies between metabolites and cognitive impairment were analyzed through a linear regression model. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Analyzing Adolescent Behavioral and Emotional Problems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software for Windows. CBCL and YSR items were scored using ADM (version 6.5) scoring software (Achenbach 1999–2006). Mean group differences for total, emotional, and behavioral problems broad-band scales were compared with t-test for independent samples (T-scores used). The mean group differences for narrow-band syndrome scales were tested with nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test (raw scores used). When analysing differences in the frequencies of adolescents with/without sleep trouble scoring over the subclinical cut-off points on the broad-band (T-score ≥ 60) and narrow-band scales (T-score ≥ 65) in the CBCL and YSR questionnaires, cross tabulation and the nonparametric chi-squared test were used. For correlation analyses we used two-tailed Pearson correlation. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). The normal distribution of data was tested by the 1-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. All statistical comparisons were performed using the unpaired t-test. The unpaired t-test was also validated using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Chi-square test or Fisher exact test was applied in the comparison of categorical variables. The values were expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD) or the median and interquartile range (IQR, range from the 25th to the 75th percentile). Pearson’s correlation was used for numerical data. Spearman’s correlation was used for nominal data. To assess the diagnostic accuracy, we performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was then estimated. A p value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The results of the intra-assay reproducibility are represented as coefficients of variation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!