The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pro prism 8

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States

GraphPad Prism 8.0 is a software application for data analysis, curve fitting, and scientific graphing. It provides a user-friendly interface for data management, statistical analysis, and visualization of scientific data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using pro prism 8

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Pro Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). All experiments were performed in triplicate and data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare differences between two groups, while one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test were used to compare differences between multiple groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Pro Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Statistical significance was evaluated by Unpaired Student's test for two groups and one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple groups. Every experiment was repeated three times. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was regarded as p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vitro and In Vivo Efficacy Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All in vitro data represented at least three independent experiments and in vivo data represented at least six independent experiments. All experimental data were expressed as mean ± SEM (standard error of mean). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Pro Prism 8.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Unpaired two‐tailed Student t‐test or one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test was employed to analyze the differences between sets of data. p‐Value < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cytotoxicity and Colony Formation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) was used for cytotoxicity analysis. Cells (5 × 103/well) were plated in 96-well plates and stimulated with drugs at different concentration gradients for 24 h. CCK-8 solution was added and incubated in an incubator for 3 h. The absorbance value was measured at 450 nm, and Cancer Chemopreventative Properties (IC50) as calculated via GraphPad Pro Prism8.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). As for colony formation assay, cells (1 × 103/well) were plated in 12-well plates and cultured for 24 h. Stimulation with different drug concentrations was added and cultured for 7 days. Cloned cell colonies were fixed, stained, and imaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparative Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All results are reported in the
form of means ± SD in this study. Comparison between 2 groups
was confirmed by the unpaired 2-tailed t test. Pearson
correlation was computed to evaluate the associations between two
continuous variables. The statistical analysis was applied in GraphPad
Pro Prism 8.0 (GraphPad, USA). A statistically significant result
was obtained at P value < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of in vitro/vivo Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All in vitro or in vivo results were expressed in the form of means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) in this study. To identify group differences, unpaired student's t-test was applied (2 group studies). For >2 groups, we used one way-ANOVA with multiple comparisons (Bonferroni's correction). P < 0.05 was used as the criterion for determining statistical significance. All analyses were executed with GraphPad Pro Prism 8.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Vitro Experimentation Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All in vitro experiments were performed at least triplicate. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Pro Prism 8.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Student’s t-test and two-way ANOVA were employed to analyze the statistical significance between two or more sets of data, respectively. P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are expressed as means ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Pro Prism 8.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). The Student t test or 1-way analysis of variance followed by the multiple comparisons test with Bonferroni correction was used to analyze the differences between sets of data. A P value less than .05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are expressed as the means ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Pro Prism 8.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Student's t test or one-way analysis of variance followed by the multiple comparisons test with Bonferroni correction were used to analyze the differences between sets of data. We used one-way analysis of variance followed by multiple comparisons test with Bonferroni correction when comparing data from more than 2 groups and Student's t test when comparing data from 2 groups. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Detailed Experimental Protocols for Scientific Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data represented at least three independent experiments. All experimental data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Unpaired two‐tailed Student t‐test or one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test was employed to analyze the differences between sets of data. p‐Value < 0.05 was considered significant. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, ns: no significant). Some results were normalized to the control to avoid sources of variation. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Pro Prism 8.0 (GraphPad, San Diegao, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!