The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Immunocap test

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in Sweden

ImmunoCAP tests are laboratory assays designed to measure specific IgE antibodies in patient samples. The tests utilize the ImmunoCAP technology, which provides a quantitative measurement of allergen-specific IgE levels. The core function of ImmunoCAP tests is to aid in the diagnosis and management of allergic conditions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using immunocap test

1

Immunoblotting analysis of IgE sensitization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting was performed to (1 (link)) demonstrate IgE sensitization of Iranian patients recruited by clinical history (not shown) and (2 (link)) to assess the IgE sensitization pattern for selected patients lacking detectable IgE binding to purified Periplaneta allergens. Briefly, P. americana extract (50 μg/cm) was applied to SDS–PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (0.2 μm, Amersham Protean, GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany) by semi-dry blotting, and visualized by Ponceau S staining (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany). After blocking with 0.3% Tween-20 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS, 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4), the membrane was incubated overnight with patient's serum (500 μl/strip, diluted 1:10 in TBS, 0.05% Tween-20, 0.1% BSA), and bound IgE was detected as described elsewhere (27 (link)).
Specific IgE values to Periplaneta (i206) and Blattella extract (i6) were determined by ImmunoCAP tests (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and to single recombinant Periplaneta allergens by experimental ImmunoCAP tests as previously described (28 (link)). Assay background of each test was assessed and cutoff level for positivity adapted as required (0.35 kUA/L for Per a 2, Per a 5, and Per a 10 and 0.10 kUA/L for all other allergens).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Atopic Dermatitis Patient Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients (n = 103) with AD were enrolled at six centers across the United States as part of the Atopic Dermatitis Research Network (ADRN) Registry study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01494142). Patients were administered a standardized set of questionnaires and underwent a physical examination (performed by a qualified medical professional) as well as blood and skin swab collection. The questionnaires, exam, and samples were used to evaluate their overall medical history and disease status. AD severity was assessed using the standardized eczema area and severity index (EASI) grading score, a sensitive clinical measure of the presentation and spread of inflamed skin at a single point in time. A higher EASI score (score range 0 to 72) equates to more-severe and extensive skin involvement. A complete blood count (CBC) with differential was performed on blood samples at Quest Diagnostics Laboratory. Total serum IgE (kU/liter) was measured by ImmunoCAP tests (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at the Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center (JHAAC). Patients were asked to self-identify their race and ethnicity from a list of 2010 United States Census categories. Patient age was calculated from self-reported date of birth to the date of study enrollment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Predictors of Food Allergy Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The outcome, probable FA, was considered present in subjects with IgE sensitization corresponding to a self‐reported adverse reaction to at least one of the 24 priority foods. Commercially available ImmunoCAP tests (Phadia, currently Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used to measure serum sIgE levels, and a value ≥0.35 kUA/L was considered positive. All serology testing was performed in a single laboratory at the Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands).
The evaluated predictors were as follows: reaction characteristics (time until onset, reproducibility of the reaction, oral allergy symptoms [OAS], skin symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, rhinoconjunctivitis, respiratory symptoms and cardiovascular symptoms); allergic comorbidities (allergic rhinitis [AR], asthma, atopic dermatitis [AD]); demoghraphic factors (age, sex, [parental] level of education); and (parental) smoking. The predictor information was obtained from both the phase I and phase II questionnaires, which were enriched versions of well‐standardized allergy questionnaires,7 with a specific focus on reactions to the priority foods. The phase I questionnaire was self‐administered, while the phase II questionnaire was conducted by trained interviewers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Advanced FOS Impact on Atopic Dermatitis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before initiation of treatment (T1) using either advanced FOS or placebo and upon completion of treatment (T2), children underwent clinical evaluations and blood tests (Figure 1). The severity of AD was assessed using the SCORAD score, ranging from 0 to 103 (European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis, 1993 (link)). This grading system includes objective and subjective scores, evaluating pruritus and sleep disturbance on scales from 0 to 10. Measurements were performed for eosinophil counts in the peripheral blood, mRNA expression levels of fatty-acid elongation enzymes, and serum total immunoglobin E (IgE) levels determined by immunoCAP tests (ThermoFisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA). Skin tape stripping and skin microbiome samples were collected at T1 and T2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Diagnostic IgE Levels in Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were taken to detect the patients' total IgE (tIgE) and birch-sIgE levels using the ImmunoCAP test (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden) at their first or follow-up visits. Levels were expressed in kUA/L within 7 classes, the upper limits of which were: class 0, 0.35 kUA/L; class 1, 0.7 kUA/L; class 2, 3.5 kUA/L; class 3, 17.5 kUA/L; class 4, 50 kUA/L; class 5, 100 kUA/L; class 6, > 100 kUA/L. The classes ≥ 1 were considered positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Demographic and Atopic Status Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Demographic information, including sex, age, medication history, duration of symptoms, history of previous surgeries, concurrent asthma, cigarette smoking and allergies to relevant airborne allergens were collected (Table I). The atopic status of the patients was evaluated by a skin prick test or an ImmunoCAP test (Phadia, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) to detect IgE antibodies against various common inhalant allergens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Skin Prick Testing and IgE Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPTs were performed with a panel of food and inhalant allergens prevalent in the region [9 (link)] (see S2 Appendix). These were provided by Inmunotek® (Madrid, Spain). Native Pru p 9 was obtained as described [13 (link)]. The ImmunoCAP® test (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wahtham, Massachussets, USA) was used to detect SIgE to Pru p 1, Pru p 3, Pru p 4 and Pru p 7 with values higher than 0.35 kUA/L indicative of the presence of antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Walnut Allergy Diagnosis in Children

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on a retrospective review of medical records, 189 patients aged 12 years or younger who visited the Ajou University Hospital (Suwon, Korea) underwent the ImmunoCAP test (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Uppsala, Sweden) for WN-sIgE levels between May 2010 and May 2015. Among these patients, the parents of 41 patients provided informed consent to participate in additional serological analysis, and serum samples were taken simultaneously and stored at -20°C.
The diagnostic criteria for clinical WN allergy were as follows: 16 1) WN-sIgE ≥ 0.10 kU/L; 2) immediate reaction in the skin, gastrointestinal, or respiratory organs within 2 h of exposure; and 3) repeated experience or met the diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis. 17 Individuals with WN-sIgE ≥ 0.10 kU/L but who were asymptomatic after consumption were classified as tolerant (T). Moreover, three patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), WN-sIgE < 0.10 kU/L, and who were asymptomatic after exposure were included as the control (C) group. Urticaria was defined as skin erythema including hives, and angioedema was defined as mucosa swelling with or without hives. We excluded cases limited to the perioral area. Controls were screened for those who were diagnosed with AD but not diagnosed with pollinosis.
The study was approved by the institutional review board at Ajou University Medical Center (MED-KSP-12-381).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!