The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using cp225d

1

Standard Chemical Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical composition analyses of the diets were conducted by standard methods (AOAC, 2005 ). Crude protein was determined using the Kjeldahl method (N × 6.25) (Kjeltec 2,300, FOSS, Hilleroed, Denmark). Crude lipid was determined by petroleum ether extraction (without acid hydrolysis) using Soxtec (Soxtec 2,055, FOSS, Denmark). Ash was determined by combusting at 550°C to constant weight in a muffle furnace (Shenyang Energy-saving Electric Furnace Factory, Shenyang, China). Starch content was analyzed by spectrophotometry (spectropolarimeter CP225D, Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany). Intestinal trypsin, α-amylase, lipase, and total protein were assayed using commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Electrospun Membrane Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-layer electrospun membranes were characterised with regards to the area density, bulk density and porosity. The area density (ρa) of electrospun nanofibrous membranes of known dimensions was measured via a semi-micro balance (Sartorius CP 225D, Goettingen, Germany), having a weighing accuracy of 10 nanograms. The bulk density (ρb) was quantified by measuring the membrane thickness via a ProGage digital micrometer thickness tester (Thwing-Albert Instrument Company, West Berlin, NJ, USA) having a precision of 0.1 μm. The overall membrane porosity was indirectly calculated by assessing the hexadecane retention capacity (CPV) of the membrane, where hexadecane was employed as a low viscosity and surface tension liquid [76 (link),77 (link),78 (link)]. CPV was determined according to Equation (2): CPV=mshmdρ×md
where msh and md are the masses of the hexadecane-saturated and respective dry membrane, respectively, whilst ρ is the density of hexadecane (ρ = 0.773 g·cm−3). Each measurement was replicated three times per sample and the mean and standard deviation were calculated and recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Porous Glass Microspheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The porosity of the porous microspheres was evaluated via mercury intrusion porosimetry (Micromeritics Autopore IV 9500). A 5 cc powder penetrometer (Micromeritics) with 1 cc intrusion volume was used for all of the glass formulations investigated. Before running the samples, an empty penetrometer test was also carried out as a blank. The porosity of the microspheres was also calculated using the following eqn (2). To determine the degradation rate, the microspheres were dried at 50 °C overnight and then weighted using a precision scale (Sartorius CP 225D). The percentage of mass loss was calculated according to the following eqn (3):
where M 0 is the initial mass (mg) of microspheres and M t is the mass obtained at each time point. The pH of the solution was measured using a microprocessor pH meter (Mettler Toledo, Switzerland) previously calibrated using standard pH buffer solutions of pH 4.0, pH 7.0 and pH 10.0 (Fisher Scientific, UK). The concentration of boron, sodium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorous and potassium ions was determined by ICP-MS (Thermo-Fisher iCAP-Q model, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Weighing Freeze-Dried Drosophila Flies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty males and thirty females emerged within 24 h of each treatment and controls were moved into 50 mL centrifuge tubes, respectively. These tubes were placed in a −20 °C freezer for 10 min to kill the adults, and were then transferred to an oven to be dried at 60 °C for 48 h. After the drying procedure, each dried fly was weighed individually using a semimicro balance (CP225D, accuracy of 0.01 mg, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Solubility Measurement of DCBNT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The solubility data of DCBNT were measured by the dynamic method and collected by the CrystalSCAN system (E1320, HEL Ltd, UK; figure 4). The mass of DCBNT was weighed using an analytical balance (CP225D, Sartorius, Germany) with an accuracy of 10−4 g. Circulating oil solution from a thermostat (Huber CC1-505wl vpc55, Germany) used with an uncertainty of u(T) = 0.01 K controlled the temperature of the mixture. 1H and 13C spectra were recorded on a 400 MHz (Bruker AVANCE 400) or 600 MHz (Bruker AVANCE 600) nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer.

Schematic of the HEL CrystalSCAN system for solubility measurement.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Fer and Fer-Me in Microparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The content of Fer or Fer-Me in the microparticulate powders was determined by the following method [28 (link)]. The microparticles (about 5 mg) were accurately weighed using a high precision analytical balance (d = 0.01 mg; Sartorius, model CP 225D, Goettingen, Germany), and dissolved in methanol at 80 °C for 15 min. The samples were then cooled at room temperature, and the final volume of the solution was adjusted at 2 mL. Then, 10 μL of filtered solutions (regenerate cellulose, 0.45 μm) was injected into the HPLC system for Fer or Fer-Me quantification. The drug loading and entrapment efficiency were calculated according to the following Equations (2) and (3): Drug loading (WW)(%)=mass of drug in microparticlesmass of loaded microparticles×100
Entrapment efficiency (%)=mass of drug in microparticlesstarting mass of drug×100
All the values obtained are the mean of four independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fer and Fer-Me Dissolution Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An accurately weighed amount of Fer or Fer-Me (about 0.6 mg weighed with the analytical balance Sartorius CP 225D), or microparticles containing an equivalent quantity of encapsulated substances, were added to 30 mL of PBS (pH 7.4). The samples were maintained at 37 °C and stirred mechanically (100 rpm). Aliquots (200 μL) were withdrawn at fixed time intervals, and 10 μL of filtered samples (regenerate cellulose, 0.45 μm) was injected into the HPLC system. An equal volume of medium was added after each sampling to maintain sink conditions. The collected samples were quantified for Fer and Fer-Me using the developed HPLC method. All the values obtained were the mean of four independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Weight Loss Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight measurements were performed in a Sartorious CP225 D micro analytical balance (Göttingen, Germany). At each irradiation time, the mean value of three independent weight measurements was calculated and mass loss determined by subtracting the corresponding value obtained at t = 0 h. Final mass loss corresponds to the mean of the mass loss values of the three replicates for each typology (includes nine readings) converted to percentage of total initial weight. Samples were kept in a desiccator after irradiation until weight measurements were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Grazer Growth and Movement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body mass of the species collected during field sampling were measured to the nearest 0.01 mg using an electronic balance (CP225D; Sartorius Co, Arvada, CO, USA). Six individuals of each species were measured. The movement rate of individuals was measured by recording the time in took to move across cage enclosure tiles from edge to edge, Movement rate were recorded on the first day of experiments (N = 6 for each species).
To estimate grazer growth rates, the initial and dry body weights of larvae were measured before and after the experiment. Twelve larvae from each species were collected before the experiment began and dried at 55 °C for 24 h. The larvae were then weighed, and the dry weight per larva was calculated for each species. At the end of the experiment, all larvae were collected from cage enclosures, and preserved in 4% formaldehyde. These larvae were then dried and weighed as described above. The daily relative growth rates for each species (RGR) was calculated as follows:
RGR=final dry weightinitial dry weight12d.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Spinetoram Residue Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the purpose of estimating the amount of spinetoram residue, an Alliance 2695 Separations Module (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used in conjunction with a Micromass Quattro Micro triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Micromass, Manchester, UK). MassLynx software V4.1 and QuanLynx were used to control the instruments and analyse the data, respectively. Using a Turbo Vap LV device from Caliper Life Science, the samples were evaporated (Hopkinton, MA, USA). A high-speed chilled centrifuge, Model Avanti J-30I, was used to centrifuge the extracts (Beckman coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The rotor heads could contain eighteen 10 mL (JA-21) and eight 50 mL (JA-30.50 T1) samples. The samples and powder reagents were weighed using a top-loading balance with a digital display (Sartorius, CP 225D, Göttingen, Germany). Fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) centrifuge tubes (Nalgene, Rochester, NY, USA) of 10 mL and 50 mL were used, respectively, for the extraction and the dSPE clean-up processes. The final extracts were stored in standard 1.8 mL dark glass autosampler vials. For sample preparation, a homogenizer (Polytron, PT-MR-3100, Kinemetica AG, Malters, Switzerland) as well as a pH metre (CL 46 type, Toshniwal Instruments Pvt. Ltd., Chennai, India) were also employed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!