The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using nsolver version 4

1

NanoString nCounter RNA Abundance Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA abundance was measured through digital multiplexed GE analysis using the NanoString nCounter system as previously described [17 (link)]. In brief, the collective CodeSet including target-specific reporters and capture probes were hybridized to regions of interest with covalently attached, target-specific sequences. Data import, quality control, and normalization of expression values were conducted with the nSolver version 4.0 (NanoString Technologies Inc.). Background subtraction from raw transcript counts was performed through negative input controls. Following housekeeping-normalization by dividing the geometric mean of six housekeeper-control genes (ACTB, G6PD, RPLP0, TBP, TFRC, and UBB), normalized counts were log2 transformed before further analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Breast Cancer Cell Line Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression of inducible breast cancer cell lines BT549, CAMA-1, HCC1428, Hs578T, MCF7, T47D, and ZR-75-1 was assessed using the NanoString platform (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA, USA), which has been described previously [28] (link). Briefly, sample RNA was hybridized with a custom 345-gene codeset (NanoString Technologies, WA, USA) at 65°C for 16 hours. Hybridized probe:target mixture was then purified and quantified via nCounter MAX Digital Analyzer (NanoString Technologies, WA, USA). The custom 345-gene codeset used has been described previously [29] (link) and includes ABCB1 as a profiling target (Suppl. Table 3). Raw counts were normalized to internal positive control probes and housekeeping genes according to default parameters in nSolver version 4.0 (NanoString Technologies, WA, USA), with background threshold set to 20. Normalized counts data are available at https://github.com/jasminerethmeyer/ABCB1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Molecular Profiling of FFPE Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FFPE tumor specimens were analyzed using a gene expression profiling (Breast Cancer 360 [BC360]; NanoString, Inc) to quantify continuous values for the messenger RNA expression of 752 genes and 30 cancer-related gene expression signatures (eg, androgen receptor signaling) and provide molecular subtyping into luminal A, luminal B, ERBB2 (formerly known as HER2)–enriched, and basallike using 58 genes and the PAM50 algorithm. Heatmaps of expression profiles were created using hierarchical clustering with nSolver, version 4.0 (NanoString) and the R heatmap statistical package (R Program for Statistical Computing) for exploratory analyses of gene signature clustering in screen- and symptom-detected cancer as well as by T and N stage. Expressions of 752 genes were individually regressed as continuous values as a function of screening status, T stage, N stage, and association with BCS and overall survival controlling for clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic factors using a threshold of unadjusted P < .05 for exploratory analyses. Where reported, false discovery rate was calculated using the Benjamini-Hochberg correction. The total number of samples obtained was restricted by project resources, which allowed the molecular analysis of 140 samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Prognostic Impact of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The raw expression data from the Digital Analyzer were normalized using nSolver version 4.0 (NanoString Technologies, Seattle USA). Briefly, the expression data were background corrected by using the geometric mean of the negative controls. The data then were normalised with the geometric mean of the five housekeeping genes. Median of expression values of examined genes was set as threshold. Expression values below median were defined as “low expression” and values above median as “high expression”.
Categorical data were compared using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. Asymmetrical numeric data (IMPC vs. IBC-NST) were analyzed by Mann–Whitney test. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed using DMFS as the endpoint. DMFS intervals were determined as the time period from initial diagnosis to the time of diagnosing distant organ metastasis. The comparison of survival functions for different strata was assessed with the log-rank statistics. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed using Cox's regression model.
Statistical significance was confirmed when p-values were < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 13.5 software (TIBCO Software Inc, Palo Alto, CA).
To compare our results of the prognostic impact of selected genes (based on DMFS) with a large database the KM Plotter Online Tool, a publicly available database was selected40 (link),41 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Gene Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gene expression analysis was performed at PhileKorea Technology (Daejeon, Korea) on a NanoString nCounter gene expression platform by Auto Immune profiling panel and Host Response advanced panel (NanoString Technologies, WA, USA). A custom code set consisting of a 773 gene panel related to infectious diseases, and 56 pathway in Host response panel, and a 750 gene panel related to autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases in Auto Immune profiling panel was used in this study. nSolver (version 4.0, NanoString Technologies) was used for differential gene expression analysis of nCounter analysis data. All reporter code count files passed the default QC settings, and by default, all raw gene expression data was normalized in the Positive Control and Housekeeping normalization steps. Fold changes were calculated by averaging normalized lanes from controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Analysis of PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human PBMCs were isolated from heparinized venous blood using Lymphoprep (1114545; Axis-shield) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA from PBMCs was extracted using TRIzol reagent (15596026; Invitrogen) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, followed by RNA quantification and assessment using QIAxpert (Qiagen). Nanostring nCounter Human Immunology gene expression assays for PBMCs were performed at PhileKorea Technology (Daejeon, South Korea), and the data were analyzed by nSolver version 4.0 (NanoString Technologies) as described previously.32 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanostring nCounter Gene Expression Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanostring nCounter Human Immunology gene expression assays and Human miRNA expression assays were performed at PhileKorea Technology (Daejeon, South Korea) using the NanoString nCounter GX Human Immunology Kit V2 (NanoString Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA) and nCounter Human miRNA Assay Kit V3 (NanoString Technologies), respectively. nSolver, version 4.0 (NanoString Technologies), was utilized for differential gene expression analyses from nCounter assay data. Based on the nSolver 4.0 Analysis Software User Manual, all reporter code count files from nCounter instruments passed the default QC settings. All raw gene expression data were normalized in positive control normalization and housekeeping normalization steps by default. Fold changes were computed by taking the mean of the normalized lanes from healthy controls, and false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p-values were calculated using the Benjamini-Yekutieli procedure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Immune Response in Anti-PD-1 Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LDH serum level and NLR were assessed at baseline; NLR was recorded after 3 months of treatment with anti-PD-1 ICI. Blood samples from enrolled patients were collected at baseline to conduct a gene profile analysis. RNA from PBMCs was extracted using RNA blood mini-Kit (Qiagen). Purified RNA was used for hybridization and underwent to gene profiling analysis on NanoString nCounter through PanCancer IO 360™ panel, characterized by human genes associated with immune activation, inflammation and control of the cell cycle. Gene data were normalized using nSolver Version 4.0 Software; NanoString. Counts were normalized to External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) technical controls and 30 housekeeping genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Profiling Tumor Immune Microenvironment from FFPE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from FFPE tumor tissues was extracted using RNeasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen). Purified RNA (100 ng) was used for hybridization and subjected to gene-profiling analysis on NanoString nCounter Sprint Profiler™ through PanCancer IO 360 panel (Nanostring Technologies), characterized by 20 internal references and 770 human genes involved in the interplay between tumor microenvironment and immune response.
Gene data were normalized and analyzed using nSolver Version 4.0 Software; volcano plots were visualized using nSolver Advanced Analysis Version 2.0.115 and R Version 3.3.2 Software (Nanostring Technologies). Due to limited sample sizes, statistical correction for multiple comparisons resulted in a null result for all comparisons. Reported p-values are uncorrected values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transcriptomic Profiling of Mouse Skin Metabolism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from frozen mouse skin samples using the TransZol Up Plus RNA Kit (TransGen Biotech, BJS, CHN). RNA concentration was assessed with Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific, CA, USA). RNA fragmentation and quality were determined with a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, CA, USA). Systematic mRNA expression was measured on a nCounter FLEX Analysis System (NanoString, Seattle, WA, USA) using the nCounter Metabolic Pathways Panel (NanoString Technologies Inc.), covering 768 Mouse mRNAs associated with metabolic processes and immunometabolism. A minimum input of 100 ng of total RNA was utilized for each sample. Fluorescently color-coded reporter probes and biotin-labeled capture probes were hybridized to the mRNA on a thermal cycler overnight and automatically processed and loaded to the NanoString provided sample cartridge in the nCounter Prep Station following the manufacturer’s protocol. The row counts resulting from the analysis were normalized against reference genes (genes selected to have a minor variance with the geNorm algorithm). The normalized data were then analyzed using NanoString’s nSolver version 4.0 software with the Advanced Analysis application tool.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!