The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using sybr premix ex tap 2

1

Gene Expression Analysis in Sugarcane

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amplification of the cDNA sequences employed the expression of aminomethyl transferase- AMT, nitrate transporter- NRT, Nitrate reductases- NR, Glutamate synthase- GS, Glutamine synthetase- GOGAT, N fixation-nifH, endo-glucanase- β-1, 4-GA, and chitinase- CHI, genes in the root tissues of sugarcane during plant-microbes interaction at tillering phase were analyzed in greenhouse condition after treatment with strains (AF1 and EF1) in GT42 sugarcane varieties with control plants. The primer sequences used in this study are presented in Supplementary Table 2. The qRT-PCR reaction mixture consisted of SYBR Premix Ex Tap™ II (TaKaRa, Japan), 10 μL of SYBR Premix, 1 μL of each primer (10 μM), 2 μL of RNA template (10 × diluted cDNA), and 6 μL of ddH2O in a total volume of 20 μL with five repeats in Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, United States). Amplification was started with a denaturation step of 94°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 30 s, and the last extension at 72°C for 2 min. To standardize qRT-PCR data, the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was utilized as the reference gene, and the relative expression of all genes was quantified using the 2–ΔΔCt technique (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Sugarcane Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of nifH, CAT, PAL, SOD, CHI and GLU genes in leaf tissues of sugarcane during plant-microorganism interaction was analyzed under a greenhouse condition after inoculation of selected strains (CY5 and CA1) in GT11 and GXB9 sugarcane varieties. Both sugarcane varieties were provided by Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, China. The relative expression of all genes was measured by calculating the difference in the expression level of the inoculated sample and the control at 60 and 120 days with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as the reference gene.
Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was conducted with SYBR Premix Ex Tap™II (TaKaRa, Japan) and the reaction was completed in RT-PCR System (Bio-Rad, USA). The total reaction volume was 20 μL, the composition of the reaction mixtures and conditions were followed by Niu et al. [98 ]. The list of primers used is presented in Table 5. The specificity of the reaction was confirmed by melting curve analysis at the end of the amplification and 2−△△Ct method was used for quantification of relative gene expression [107 (link)]. Each RT-qPCR experiment was conducted in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Validating Pyrosequencing Analysis with qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate the results of pyrosequencing analysis, we determined the expression levels of 10 DEGs by qRT-PCR. Total RNAs from each sample were extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR® Premix Ex Tap™ II (TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qRT-PCR cycles were carried out on a Step One Real-Time PCR system (ABI) as follows: 30 s at 95 °C for denaturation, followed by 40 cycles of 5 s at 95 °C for denaturation, 30 s at 60 °C for annealing. Fluorescence data was collected at 60 °C. A melting curve was performed from 60 °C to 95 °C (held for 1 s per 0.1 °C increase) to examine the specificity of the amplified product. Primers used in qRT-PCR for validation of differentially expressed genes are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1, an actin gene from woodland strawberry was selected as the reference gene. Expression quantification and data analysis were performed in accordance with Bustin et al. [23 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis of HSC-T6 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from HSC-T6 cells according to the specifications of RNA the reagent (Invitrogen, California, USA), and reverse transcription of RNAs was performed by using the PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix kit (Takara Bio, Japan). Then, real-time PCR was conducted by using SYBR Premix Ex Tap™ II (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan). After normalization to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), the relative amount of the PCR products was calculated using the 2 − ΔΔCt method. The primers were designed by Primer 5.0 and are shown in Table 1.

The primer sequences used for RT-qPCR

GenePrimerID
α-SMA

Forward: ACCATCGGGAATGAACGCTT

Reverse: CTGTCAGCAATGCCTGGGTA

58
Collagen I

Forward: GAGACAGGCGAACAAGGTGA

Reverse: GGGAGACCGTTGAGTCCATC

1277
Wnt3a

Forward: CGGGTTCTTCTCTGGTCCTTG

Reverse: GGGCATGATCTCCACGTAGT

89,780
GAPDH

Forward: GCAAGTTCAACGGCACAG

Reverse: GCCAGTAGACTCCACGACAT

2597
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lung tissues were homogenized and the total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Takara, China),then the RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the Prime Script® RT reagent kit (Takara, China). Real-time PCR assay on the samples was carried out using the SYBR® Premix Ex Tap™ II (Takara, China) as follows: The conventional reaction conditions for Real-time PCR assay were as follows: one cycle of 95°C for 30s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5s and 60°C for 34s. All experiments were repeated for three times. The Real-time PCR data were analyzed by QuantStudio 7 Flex detection system (Applied Biosystems Co., USA). The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to evaluate the mRNA levels of specified genes after normalization by GAPDH. The specific primer sequences were used in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of MMP-9 and MMP-2 expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from tissue specimens using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (n = 7). After determining the total RNA concentration, reverse transcription to cDNA was carried out using the Evo M-MLV Reverse Transcription Premix Kit (cat. no. AG11728; agbio; China). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis was then performed on a Roche LightCycler 96 using SYBR premix Ex Tap II (Takara). All assays were conducted three times and were performed in triplicate. The data analysis involved the ΔΔCt method. All primers were synthesized by tsingke (Beijing; China). Primers used in this study were as follows:

MMP-9: Forward primer 5’-GGGACGCAGACATCGTCATC-3’;

Reverse primer 5’- TCGTCATCGTCGAAATGGGC-3’;

MMP-2: Forward primer 5’-TGGCAAGTACGGCTTCTGTC-3’;

Reverse primer 5’- TTCTTGTCGCGGTCGTAGTC -3’;

β-Actin: Forward primer 5’- CATGTACGTTGCTATCCAGGC-3’;

Reverse primer5’- CTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGAT -3’.

β-Actin was considered the endogenous control.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Real-Time Quantitative PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed using QuantStudioTM Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, United States). Each reaction was conducted in a 20 μL volume that consisted of the following: 10 μL SYBR Premix Ex Tap II (Takara Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Dalian, China), 0.4 μL each of the forward and reverse primer, 0.4 μL ROX Reference Dye (50×), 1.5 μL cDNA template, and 7.3 μL ddH2O. The beta-actin gene (MK450335.1) was used as the reference gene to normalize the expression of target genes and correct variation. Following RT-qPCR, the reaction process was as follows: 5 min at 95°C, followed by 45 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, 60°C for 31 s, and dissociation. A fluorescence melting curve from 55 to 95°C was used to ensure a single gene-specific peak and the absence of primer-dimer peaks. Each PCR reaction was replicated three times. The primers used in RT-qPCR analysis were designed by Primer-BLAST5 and are listed in Supplementary Table 1. The relative expression levels of GpHsps among the different samples were measured using 2–ΔΔCt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Antiviral Effects of LS on SARS-CoV-2 Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell monolayer (5 × 105 cells/well) in 12-well plates were washed with PBS and then were inoculated with the 501Y.V2/B.1.35 strain or G/478K.V1/ B.1.617.2 strain at MOI of 1 for 2 h. The inoculums were removed after infection, and the cells were divided into six groups: normal control group (NC), virus-infected group (virus), positive control group (remdesivir), three concentrations of LS (2, 1, 0.5 μg/mL), the cells were harvested at 48 h. Total RNA from the different groups was extracted according to the specification of RNA reagent (Invitrogen, MA, USA), and reverse transcription of RNAs was quantified by using the PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix kit (Takara Bio, Japan). Then, RT-PCR was performed on cDNA samples via the SYBR Premix Ex Tap™ II (Takara Bio, Japan). The PCR data were analyzed using the detection system (ABI PRISM® 7500 Real-time PCR system, Applied Biosystems Co., USA). The relative amount of PCR products was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method as previously described [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Tumor Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from tissue specimens using TRIzol (Invitrogen), and reverse transcribed into cDNA with Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (M-MLV; Invitrogen). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis was then performed on a Roche LightCycler 96 using SYBR premix Ex Tap II (Takara). The data analysis involved the ΔΔCt method. All primers were synthesized by Sangon (Shanghai, China). The tumor markers were AFP, CEA, CA125, PSA, and GH, and the corresponding genes were AFP, CEACAM5, MUC16, KLK3, and GH1, respectively. We designed two PI15 primers for PCR, which were designated PI15–1 and PI15–2, respectively. Supplementary Table S5 shows detailed information relating to the PCR primers used for PI15, AFP, CEACAM5 [18 (link)], MUC16, KLK3 [19 (link)], and GH1 [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Autophagy Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNAiso Plus (Takara Co., Japan) was used to isolate total RNA. Ultraviolet spectrophotometry (A260/A280 ratio) was used to analyze the quantity and quality of RNA. Reverse transcription was performed using Prime Script Rt reagent Kit (Takara Co., Japan), and the samples were then analyzed using the SYBR Premix Ex TapII (Takara Co., Japan) by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) (Stratagene MX3000P, Japan). The procedure was as follows: initial activation step for 10 s/95°C; denaturation with 40 cycles for 20 s/95°C; annealing step for 20 s/60°C. Formula 2−(ΔΔCT) was used to determine the change in mRNA levels. GAPDH mRNA was used to normalize the relative amount of mRNA. The primers for genes were as follows: GAPDH forward: 5-GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC-3 and reverse: 5-TGGTGAAGACG CCAGTGGA-3’; MAPLC3II forward: 5-CCTAGAAGGCGCTTACAGCT-3 and reverse: 5-GGGACAATTTCATCCCGAAC-3’; Beclin1 forward:5-GCGA ATTCATGGAAGGGTCTAAGACGTCCAACAACA-3 and reverse: 5- GCGGATCCTC ATTTGTTATAAAATTGTGAGGACACC-3'.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!