The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Titan g2 80 200 chemistem

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Titan G2 80–200 ChemiSTEM is a transmission electron microscope (TEM) designed for high-resolution imaging and chemical analysis of materials. It features a 80-200 kV accelerating voltage and an advanced ChemiSTEM energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) system for elemental mapping and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using titan g2 80 200 chemistem

1

Structural Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The AFM images were acquired in tapping mode with Veeco DI3100. The XRD data were taken using a monochromated Cu-Kα source on a Bruker AXS D8-Discover. Cross-sectional specimens for STEM investigations were prepared by a FEI Quanta 3D FEG Focused Ion Beam. STEM images were acquired using a spherical aberration-corrected microscope equipped with four Super-X EDS detectors (FEI Titan G2 80-200 Chemi STEM, 30 mrad convergence angle).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Atomic-Resolution HAADF-STEM Imaging and EDS Mapping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atomic resolution high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) was carried out. Planar view samples (observation along the [001] direction) and cross-sectional view samples (observation along the [010] direction) were prepared by focused ion beam (FIB) (FEI Quanta 3D FEG) for observation by transmission electron microscopy. In consideration of the damage caused by ion beam in FIB, we used low voltage and beam current of 2 kV/27 pA. The observations were performed by spherical aberration-corrected electron microscopy on a FEI Titan G2 80–200 ChemiSTEM (30 mrad convergence angle, 0.8 Å spatial resolution), equipped with Super-X energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) with four windowless silicon-drift detectors. The positions of the atomic columns in the images were confirmed by a mathematical method involving Gaussian Fitting based on MATLAB. Polarization mapping was performed by calculating ion displacements in the HAADF-STEM images. The microscopy data for quantitative analysis were acquired under the condition of the sample drifting less than 1 Å min−1. Atomic-resolution EDS mapping was performed with an electron beam current of ~100 pA and a dwell time of 10 μs per pixel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterizing Ti-10Mo Alloy Structure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental material was Ti-10Mo (wt. %) alloy, which was first solution treated at 1000 °C for 1 h and aged at 600 °C for 10 min to obtain a dual-phase structure with coexistence of α and β phases, then followed by quenching to room temperature. The thin TEM specimens were fabricated by using a FEI Quata 3D FEG type dual-beam focused ion beam (FIB) instrument. The atomic structure of the TiMo alloy specimen was characterized by spherical aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (FEI Titan G2 80–200 ChemiSTEM) with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The TEM samples for the in-situ tensile test were thinned by PIPS instrument in order to obtain electron-transparent area. The specimen was adhered to a substrate at ambient temperature and placed for 24 h. Lastly, the specimen was strained by using a Gatan 671 low-temperature tensile holder at ambient temperature in a FEI Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWIN TEM with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The micro-pillars for the compression tests were prepared using the above FIB instrument and the pillars were processed into three sizes (0.5 μm, 1 μm and 3 μm, respectively). The in-situ compression experiments were performed in FIB with a Hysitron PI 87 micro-indenter in a displacement-control mode and the displacement rate was 5 nm/s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimetallic Alloy Microstructure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology and microstructure of the multimetallic alloy were characterized by an atomic resolution analytical transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Titan G2 80–200 ChemiSTEM, FEI worked at 200 kV and equipped with 4 probe super EDS) featuring with high-resolution TEM (HRTEM), high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM), and corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometry. The samples were prepared via dropping the HEA-NPs, which were dispersed in ethanol, onto the carbon-coated molybdenum TEM grids employing capillary at least five times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Electrochemical CO2 Reduction to Methanol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The TEM and HAADF-STEM mapping images were characterized by three types of TEM instrument (thermoscientific Talos F200X G2; Titan G2 80-200 Chemi-STEM, FEI; and ARM200F, JEOL) operated at 200 kV. X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectra at Pd K-edge and Au L3-edge were performed at BL14W1 station (Shanghai, 3.5 GeV, and 250 mA). XPS was performed using a Shimadzu Axis Supra (Al Ka and  = 1486.6 eV). XRD patterns were performed on a Rigaku Smart-Lab operating (Cu Ka, λ = 1.5406 Å, 40 kV, and 40 mA). The Pd and Au loading amounts were determined by the ICP-OES instrument. The tested CH3OH and CH3OOH (C1 liquid products) were prepared by adding 300 μL of electrolyte with 250 μL of D2O and 25 μL of DMSO solution (6 mM). The 1H spectrum peak of DMSO is at ~2.6 ppm. The 1H spectrum peak of D2O is at ~4.7 ppm. 1H spectrum peaks of CH3OH and CH3OOH are at ~3.3 and ~3.6 ppm, respectively. The total amount (CH3OH and CH3OOH) was gas chromatography (GC) analyzed, and the amount of CH3OOH was determined by the minus method. The CO2 was analyzed by GC with FID (Thermo Fisher, T1300). The standard curve method was employed to quantify the content of all products. The following formulae (1) and (2) were employed to calculate the CH3OH yield and selectivity of all products. CH3OHyieldmmolg1h1=CH3OH(mmol)weightofAuPdg×reactiontime(h) CH3OHselectivity%=CH3OH(mmol)Allproducts(mmol)×100%
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Characterization of Metallic Glass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Density measurements, based on the Archimedes method, were conducted using a high precision balance with an accuracy of ±0.01 mg. They were repeated at least 15 times to ensure data reliability. Vickers microhardness was measured on the cross-section using a Matsuzawa MMT-X indentation machine with a load of 1.96 N and holding for 15 s. The microstructure of the samples was examined by TEM using a Cs-corrected FEI Titan G2 80-200 ChemiSTEM. Specimens for TEM were cut from the bulk MG specimens and thinned using a dual-beam FIB system (FEI Helios Nano-Lab 600i). Uniaxial compression tests were performed in an Instron 5982 mechanical testing machine at a strain rate of 1 × 10−4 s−1 at room-temperature. The specimens, 2 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height with two ends, were carefully polished to ensure parallelism. The fracture features and surface morphology of all the samples after compression failure were investigated by scanning electron microscopy on a Zeiss Sigma500 field emission gun SEM. The height maps of the fracture surface of all the samples were measured by the Dektak XT profile measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Exosome Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood samples from healthy individuals were collected, and the blood samples were centrifuged at 300 × g, 1,200 × g, and 10,000 × g at 4°C for 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively, to obtain the serum samples. The samples were further centrifuged at 100,000 × g at 4°C for 70 min, using a F50L-2461.5 T centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The collected exosomes were stained with 1% uranyl acetate (pH = 4.0), and the shape of the particles was observed using a 200 kV transmission electron microscope (TEM, Titan G2 80–200 Chemistem, FEI, USA). The levels of exosome-specific biomarkers TSG101 and CD81 were determined by western blot analysis. The particles were further validated using a nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) system (NTA 3.2 Dev Build 3.2.16, Malvern Panalytical Ltd., UK). The Brownian motion of the particles was captured by laser beams and recorded by a camera. The peak diameter of the particles was then evaluated using the Stokes-Einstein equation (PMID: 32,060,049).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!