The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lncprofiler qpcr array kit

Manufactured by System Biosciences
Sourced in United States

The LncProfiler qPCR Array Kit is a comprehensive solution for the quantitative analysis of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) expression. The kit includes a pre-designed set of primer assays for the detection and quantification of multiple lncRNA targets using real-time PCR technology.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using lncprofiler qpcr array kit

1

Comprehensive lncRNA and mRNA Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of 90 lncRNA was performed using the LncProfiler™ qPCR Array Kit (System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA). RNA from EV or donor cells (n = 3 per each cell line) were treated with DNase I and 2 μg of DNase-treated RNA was reverse transcribed. Real-time PCR was performed (2X Maxima® SYBR Green with Rox, Fermentas, Glen Burnie, MD) and the cycle number at which the reaction crossed a threshold (CT) was determined for each gene. Raw CT values were normalized using a median CT value (ΔCT = CTlncRNA − CTmedian). The relative amount of each lncRNA in HCC cells relative to nonmalignant hepatocyte (fold change) was described using the equation 2−ΔΔCT where ΔΔCT = ΔCTHCC cell − ΔCTnonmalignant hepatocytes and each lncRNA in EVs relative to donor cells was described using the equation 2−ΔΔCT where ΔΔCT = ΔCTEV − ΔCTdonor cell. The expression of 84 mRNAs associated with liver cancers was examined using RT2 Profiler™ PCR Array System (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA was isolated from cells and incubated with DNase I. One μg of DNase-treated RNA was reverse transcribed using RT2 First Strand Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Real-time PCR was performed (SABiosciences RT2 qPCR Master Mix, Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and mRNA expression levels were evaluated using a comparative CT method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Upon completion of alcohol treatments, cells were harvested, and total cell lysates were collected. RNA was extracted using SurePrep RNA Isolation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Complementary DNA was synthesized according to the manufacturer’s protocol, using LncProfiler qPCR Array kit (catalogue no. RA900A-1; System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

LncRNA Profiling in Serum Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from 200 µL of aliquoted serum samples using the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma RNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Then, 25 pg/µL of RNA was used for cDNA synthesis, which was performed using the RT2 First Strand Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The LncProfiler qPCR Array Kit (System Biosciences (SBI), Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used to conduct LncRNA profiling analysis. The kit was provided with one 96-well ready-to-use qPCR plate containing predesigned PCR primer sets for specific lncRNAs. The qPCR reaction was performed on a LightCycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) instrument using a LightCycler 480 SYBR Green Master Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 18S rRNA, RNU43, GAPDH, LAMIN A/C, and U6 genes were used as housekeeping genes. Relative quantification analysis was used to detect specific lncRNA profiling and then analyzed by Livak and Schmittgen’s 2−ΔΔCT (delta-delta Ct) method. Relative ratio values were presented. A result of 0 to 1 was evaluated as downregulated and >1 was evaluated as upregulated [12 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive qPCR and ChIP-qPCR Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For qPCR, 100 ng of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) and KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Kit Master Mix (2×) Universal (KAPA BIOSYSTEMS, Boston, MA, USA) according to the manufacturers’ recommendations, and MIQE guideline [52 (link)]. qPCR was performed using the Thermal Cycler Dice Real Time System (Takara Bio Inc.) or CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., CA, USA). All reactions were performed in triplicate. An lncRNA analysis was performed using the LncProfiler qPCR Array Kit (System Biosciences, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. For qPCR, 10 ng of total RNAs was reverse-transcribed using TaqMan probes (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. To perform ChIP-qPCR, genomic DNAs from formamide-fixed cells were analyzed using Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Kits (Takara Bio Inc.) according to the manufacture’s recommendations. The primers and antibodies are listed in S6 Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Expression Profiling of 90 Human lncRNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression profiling of 90 human lncRNA was performed using the LncProfiler™ qPCR Array Kit (System Biosciences) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. RNA from EV or donor cells (n = 3 per each cell line) were treated with DNase I and 2 μg of DNase-treated RNA was reverse transcribed. Real-time PCR was performed (2X Maxima® SYBR Green with Rox, Fermentas, Glen Burnie, MD) and the cycle number at which the reaction crossed a threshold (CT) was determined for each gene. Raw CT values were normalized using a median CT value (ΔCT = CTlncRNA – CTmedian). For each lncRNA, the relative amount of each lncRNA between two sample sets A and B was described using the equation 2-ΔΔCT where ΔΔCT =ΔCTA- ΔCTB.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of lncRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol (Life Technologies) and treated with RNase-free DNase I (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA concentration was measured using NanoDrop ND-2000 (Nano-Drop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). One microgram of RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (BIO-RAD Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA), and real-time quantitative RT-PCR was performed using a LightCycler 96 System (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) to detect BAP1, NEAT-1, NDM29, MER11C, SNHG4, β-actin, and U6 using SYBR green I (SYBR® Advantage® qPCR Premix, Clontech, Mountain View, CA). RT-PCR primer sequences are listed in Additional file 2: Table S2. PCR based expression profiling of lncRNA was performed using the LncProfiler qPCR Array Kit (System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA from BAP1 knock-down/out cells were treated with DNase I and 2 μg of DNase-treated RNA was reverse transcribed. Real-time PCR was performed (2X Maxima SYBR Green with Rox) and the cycle number at which the reaction crossed a threshold (CT) was determined for each gene. Raw CT values were normalized using a median CT value (ΔCT = CTlncRNA- CTmedian). For each lncRNA, the relative amount of each lncRNA between 2 sample sets A and B was described using the equation 2-ΔΔCT, where ΔΔCT = ΔCTA -ΔCTB.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Profiling Regulatory lncRNAs in Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, the 90 lncRNAs, potentially connected with cancer and well-annotated and registered in the lncRNA database (www.lncrnadb.org), were analyzed using the commercially available LncProfiler qPCR Array Kit (SBI).
Reverse transcription was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol and was based on three steps: i) poly-A tailing; ii) annealing anchor dT adaptor; and iii) cDNA synthesis.
cDNA was used for the qRT-PCR reaction using LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master buffer (Roche) and lncRNA primers from Primer Plate (component of the LncProfiler qPCR Array Kit) according to the manufacturer’s protocol by the LightCycler 96 (Roche). All qRT-PCR data were analyzed by calculating the ΔCt, normalized against mean expression of anti-nitric oxide synthase (NOS)2A+human accelerated region (HAR)1B+taurine upregulated gene (TUG)1, which were the most stable transcripts in all of the examined samples (healthy and cancer) with the lowest Cts variation compared to the reference genes from the LncProfiler qPCR Array Kit (SBI). The fold-change of lncRNA expression was determined by equation 2–ΔCt and compared to the appropriate group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparing cDNA Synthesis Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reverse transcription was performed using three different commercially available kits: i) LncProfiler qPCR Array Kit (SBI); ii) iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad); and iii) First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas). For all reactions, the same amount of total RNA (1 μg/reaction) from the same isolation was used. All experiments (RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and qRT-PCR) were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of NEAT1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HNSCC cell lines: SCC-040 (oral cancer model), SCC-25 (tongue cancer model), FaDu (hypopharyngeal cancer model), CAL27 (tongue cancer model), and DOK (dysplastic oral keratinocyte cells from a tongue as a model of healthy tissue) were used for the study and cultivated as described previously [31 (link)]. Patients’ RNA samples, tumour and matched adjacent normal, were taken from a previous study [31 (link)]. Expression levels of NEAT1 (family) in cell lines and patients’ samples were measured using lncProfiler qPCR Array Kit (SBI) and SYBR Green 2x Master Mix (Roche) as described previously [32 (link)]. All real-time PCR data were analysed by calculating the 2-ΔCT, normalising against the mean of reference genes (18S rRNA, RNU43, GAPDH, LAMIN A/C, U6) from the quantification plate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!