The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Excel version 2016

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

Excel Version 2016 is a spreadsheet software application. It provides tools for organizing, analyzing, and visualizing data. The core function of Excel 2016 is to create and manipulate digital spreadsheets.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using excel version 2016

1

Descriptive Statistics for Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were summarized using descriptive statistics, including means, standard deviations, and frequencies. Microsoft Excel Version 2016 and IBM SPSS Statistics Version 25 were used to generate descriptive statistics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data for these experiments were processed using Excel version 2016 and SPSS software Version 19.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). The data were tested by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on least significant difference (LSD) (p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparing Methods for Wild Boar and Fox Sampling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS IBM version 21 software and Excel (version 2016) for the 95% Confidence Interval. Data was processed using the Shapiro-Wilk, Pearson Chi-Square and Fischer’s Exact tests. A “p” value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests.
In order to evaluate the agreement between the two methods used in this study, 101 wild boar and 99 fox samples were selected and analysed by both methods. Agreement was defined as the ratio of positive and negative samples of both methods implemented, divided by the total number of samples tested.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Surgical Admissions Study in Nepal

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among patients admitted to the Department of Surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences, Mahaboudha, Kathmandu, Nepal from 1 July 2021 to 1 July 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 202/2079/80). Patients admitted to the Department of Surgery during the aforementioned study period were included and those with incomplete hospital record data were excluded from the study. A convenience sampling method was used. The sample size was calculated using the following formula:
Where,
Hence, Thus, the calculated minimum required sample size was 1621. After adding 10% for the non-response rate and sample size of 1802 was obtained. However, 2452 patients were taken for the study. Data were entered in a Microsoft Excel Version 2016 and analysed with IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. Point estimate and 95% CI were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mosquito Insecticide Susceptibility Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Insecticide susceptibility was based on the criteria that 98–100% mortality of mosquito indicates susceptibility, 80–97% mortality implies potential resistance that needs to be confirmed via biochemical assays, and <80% mortality implies resistance (WHO 2016 ). Regression probit analysis was used to compute KDT50 and KDT95. Chi-square analysis was used to compare percentage mortality between insecticide only and PBO + insecticide. All data analyses were computed using Microsoft Excel version 2016 and IBM SPSS Statistics 23.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!