The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Microscan

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in United States, Germany, France, Canada

The MicroScan is a compact and versatile lab equipment designed for various analytical tasks. It features a high-resolution microscope and advanced imaging capabilities, allowing users to examine samples with precision. The MicroScan is a reliable and efficient tool for applications that require detailed visual inspection and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

43 protocols using microscan

1

Identification of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty four clinical strains of A. baumannii obtained from in-patients Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (HUMC) of which 21 isolates were investigated and identified to the species level by using Vitek2 (BioMérieux Vitek Systems Inc., USA) and MicroScan (WalkAway System, Siemens, USA) systems utilizing biochemical methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluation of Direct VITEK MS and VITEK2 AST for Positive Blood Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was approved by Emory IRB and was conducted in Grady Memorial Hospital, a 960-bed, inner city teaching hospital, during the period from 8/1/12 to 5/30/13. One hundred positive blood cultures from 100 different patients were included in the study. As there were no polymicrobic bottles seen during the study period, only monomicrobic isolates from positive blood bottles were studied.
Blood samples collected and inoculated in BacT/ALERT® anaerobic (SN) and standard aerobic (SA) non-charcoal based blood culture bottles, were incubated in the BacT/ALERT 3D system (bioMérieux, Durham, NC). When a signal-positive bottle was detected, aliquot was taken from positive bottles for Gram stain and subculture on solid media. Isolates grown from culture media were used for ID and full panel AST by using conventional methods such as MicroScan (Siemens, West Sacramento, CA) and VITEK® 2 (bioMérieux). In parallel, aliquot taken from positive blood culture bottles were processed using the LFM for direct ID by VITEK MS and full panel AST by VITEK2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Resistance in Urinary Tract Infections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ESBL are enzymes that give resistance to most beta-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins, cephalosporins, and the monobactam aztreonam. Bacteremia is defined when there are bacteria present in bloodstream. The causative microbes were confirmed by the presence of microorganisms with a colony count of 105 CFU/mL in urine cultures or the isolation of microorganisms from blood specimens of patients using automated methods. Detection of ESBL producing Escherichia coli and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of urinary tract pathogens were identified using a Vitek II automated system (bioMérieux Inc.) or Microscan (Siemens Healthcare Inc.) at each hospital. The susceptibility of a uropathogen to an antibiotic was determined by interpreting the breakpoints recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (2017).[12 ] Microbial isolates showing intermediate antimicrobial susceptibility were considered to be resistant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microbiological Analysis of COPD Sputum Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spontaneous sputum samples were collected within 24 hours of presentation of ECOPD symptoms as well as from clinically stable COPD cases. All the sputum samples were collected in sterile containers and transferred to the microbiological laboratory within 2 hours of collection for Gram staining and bacterial culture. All the sputum samples were classified according to Murray-Washington criteria, thus grade IV (10–25 epithelial cells and > 25 leucocytes per field) and grade V (< 10 epithelial cells and > 25 leucocytes per field) were cultured quantitatively and a bacterial load ≥106 colony forming units (CFU)/ml was considered as significant. Culture was performed in non-selective (sheep blood agar, chocolate agar) and selective media (MacConkey agar) at 37°C for 48 hours in 5% CO2, and bacterial species identification was conducted biochemically (Microscan, Siemens). The identified microorganisms were classified as potentially pathogenic microorganisms (PPM) including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus methicillin susceptible or resistant, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Gram negative-bacilli, and non-PPM included Candida spp., Streptococcus viridans, Neisseria spp., Staphylococcus epidermidis and Corynebacterium spp.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Validating Organism and ARG Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The comparator method(s) for organism identification were the site’s SOC, including traditional culture, FDA-cleared matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (i.e., bioMérieux Vitek MS and Bruker Biotyper), and automated phenotypic identification and antibiotic susceptibility platforms (e.g., Becton, Dickinson [BD] Phoenix, bioMérieux Vitek 2, and Siemens MicroScan). The phenotypic methods listed above varied at different sites and served as the site’s reference identification standard. Due to issues with organism misidentification, samples with a member of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (15 (link)) or Candida parapsilosis (16 (link)) identified by SOC were confirmed using analytically validated PCR amplification assays followed by bidirectional sequencing (PCR/sequencing) or 16S sequencing by Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LabCorp [Burlington, NC]) according to FDA clinical trial instructions outlined in the 510k summary (10 ). The comparator methods for ARGs were analytically validated by real-time PCR amplification assay(s) followed by bidirectional sequencing, developed and performed by LabCorp.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae was defined, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines [21 (link)], as Enterobacteriaceae resistant to 1 or more of the following carbapenems: imipenem, meropenem, or ertapenem. Bacterial identification and routine antimicrobial susceptibilities were performed using MicroScan (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) or Vitek 2 (bioMérieux) supplemented by a GN4F Sensititre tray (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to confirm carbapenem susceptibility results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Diarrhea

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using custom dehydrated MicroScan broth microdilution (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics), following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (Cockerill, 2012 ) and relative susceptibility interpretations were based on CLSI clinical breakpoints (CLSI, 2017 ).
Thirteen antimicrobial agents commonly used to treat diarrhea were tested. Results were only included in the analysis when corresponding quality control isolate test results were in accordance with CLSI, 2017 guidelines, which were unchanged between 2014 and 2017 and therefore within an acceptable range.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Detecting Bloodstream Infections Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two sets of 2 blood samples (BACTEC Plus Aerobic and Anaerobic, BD), taken 30 minutes apart, and containing 8–10 mL of blood each, were drawn from patients who had fever of 38°C or when BSI was suspected based on any clinical sign or symptom. Microbial identification was performed using commercially available panels (MicroScan [Siemens] or Vitek [Bio erieux]) or by standard biochemical and/or enzymatic test.
Antibiotic susceptibility was tested using the microdilution method following the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The screening of MDR-phenotypes including MRSA, ampicillin- and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, ESBL production, and carbapenemase production was conducted according to CLSI recommendations.2 ,3
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phenotypic Detection of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were routinely cultured on MacConkey and blood agar plates. Blood and sputum were also cultured on chocolate agar. All suspected colonies were identified by gram staining, colony characteristics, motility, and so forth. Strains were identified to the species level with bioMérieux API20E and confirmed by Siemens MicroScan Negative ID panel Type 2. MICs were determined using MicroScan dehydrated broth microdilution panel negative MIC Type 37 (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, West Sacramento, CA), following the manufacturer's guidelines and Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [15 ]. MICs were interpreted following CLSI guidelines, including the new clinical breakpoints published in 2010 for carbapenems [16 ]. ESBL detection: phenotypic—the ESBL detection was done as was recommended by the CLSI confirmatory procedure, by using cefotaxime (30 μg) and ceftazidime (30 μg) discs alone and in combination with clavulanic acid discs. K. pneumoniae (ATCC-700603) were used as the controls throughout the study [17 ]. The ESBL production was confirmed by MicroScan MIC 37 panel using combination of cefotaxime/K clavulanate (Cft/CA) and ceftazidime/K clavulanate (Caz/CA) [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CRKP are defined as K. pneumoniae isolates with non-susceptibility to the following carbapenems as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines; meropenem, imipenem or ertapenem9 . Bacterial identification and routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed with MicroScan (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) or Vitek2 (BioMerieux), supplemented by GN4F Sensititre tray (Thermo Fisher) to confirm carbapenem results and to test tigecycline susceptibility. The majority of CRKP in CRaCKle are confirmed to carry blaKPC, as previously described8 (link). For interpretation of tigecycline MIC results breakpoints defined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) were used; susceptible, intermediate, and resistant defined as MIC <2 μg/mL, 2 μg/mL, and >2 μg/mL, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!