The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Softmax pro software v5

Manufactured by Molecular Devices
Sourced in United States

SoftMax Pro Software v5.4.1 is a data acquisition and analysis software developed by Molecular Devices. It is designed to work with various microplate readers and spectrophotometers produced by the company. The software's core function is to provide users with tools for collecting, processing, and analyzing data generated from these laboratory instruments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using softmax pro software v5

1

Protein Extraction from Tomato Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins from tomato leaves of four biological replicates were prepared according to Hurkman and Tanaka50 (link) with the following modifications. Samples were ground in liquid nitrogen into fine powder and incubated in extraction buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 8.8, 10 mM EDTA, 0.2 M DL-Dithiothreitol, 0.9 M sucrose), continued by grinding in a fume hood, and then the extract was agitated for 2hrs at room temp. After washing twice with 0.1 M ammonium acetate in methanol and twice with 80% acetone, the dried pellet was dissolved with 2D buffer (8 M Urea, 4% CHAPS, 40 mM Tris-base, 2 M Thiourea). Protein assays were performed using an EZQ Protein Quantitation Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with the SoftMax Pro Software v5.3 (Molecular Devices, Downingtown, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Streptococcus mutans Proteome Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biological pentaplicates (i.e. n = 5 replicates per S. mutans strain per growth condition, including the n = 3 replicates analyzed previously by RNA-seq.7 (link)) of each S. mutans culture were processed for protein extraction according to Fujiki et al.18 (link) with the following modifications: Samples were ground into fine powder in liquid nitrogen and agitated in extraction buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 8.8, 10 mM EDTA, 0.2 M DTT, 0.9 M sucrose) with an equal volume of phenol (pH 8.0) for 2 hours at room temperature. The phenol phase was precipitated by adding five volumes of 0.1 M ammonium acetate in methanol. After washing twice with 0.1 M ammonium acetate in methanol and twice with 80% acetone, the dried pellet was dissolved with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer. The mixtures were incubated on ice before centrifugation at 4 °C for 20 minutes at 12,000 × g, separating the proteins into soluble and insoluble phases. The insoluble phase was incubated with protein buffer (8 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2% ASB-14 (amidosulfobetaine 14)) for at least one hour with occasional vortexing. The proteins were quantified using an EZQ Protein Quantitation Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and SoftMax Pro Software v5.3 (Molecular Devices, Downingtown, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Coral Proteome Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coral fragments that were incubated for 48 h were subjected to proteomic analysis. Previously frozen samples were thawed and tissue was removed from the calcium carbonate skeleton over ice using a Paansche airbrush (Paansche, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and homogenate buffer (50 mM phosphate buffer, (pH 7.8) with 0.05 mM dithiothreitol). Four biological replicates were used per treatment (total = 20). Total protein was isolated from crude tissue homogenates (~2 g of coral tissue) as described previously [61 (link)] with the following modifications. Tissue was ground in liquid N2 with a pre-cooled mortar and pestle in 6 mL of extraction buffer (1.2% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 10 mM EDTA, 0.9 M sucrose) and 6 mL Tris-saturated phenol (pH 8.8), followed by overnight incubation at room temperature with shaking. All chemicals were obtained from Millipore Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless noted otherwise. Samples were centrifuged at room temperature for 40 min at 5,000 g. The resulting protein pellets were dissolved in 4 M urea and 0.1% SDS in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). Protein concentration was measured using the EZQ Protein Quantification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) with SoftMax Pro Software v5.3 (Molecular Devices, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of IL-1β secretion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in 12‐well plate at 105 cells per well and cultured for 48 h until confluency (#665180, Greiner Bio‐One, Monroe, NC, USA). Media were then aspirated and 500 μL of fresh media was added, and cells were incubated for another 24 h. Supernatant was used for human IL‐1β quantification using Quantikine ELISA kit (#DLB50, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Plate was read with SpectraMax 190 absorbance microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) using the softmax pro software v5.4.1 (Molecular Devices). IL‐1β quantification was measured five times per cell line.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fluorescence-based Agonist Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence emission data (fluorescence intensity versus time) were captured from the FlexStation 3 using SoftMax Pro software v. 5.4.1 (Molecular Devices Inc., 1992–2010) on a Dell Optiplex 960 PC workstation. The area under the time–response curve was calculated for the entire recording and imported into GraphPad Prism v. 4.03 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) for nonlinear curve fitting. Raw concentration–response data were fitted with a four parameter logistic equation: Y =Bottom+(Top−Bottom)/(1+10((LogEC50X)×Slope), where X=logarithm of concentration and Y =response. The EC50 and 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained. Maximum and minimum fluorescence responses were normalized to 100% and 0%, respectively, to permit comparison of hTRPA1 agonist activity of the test compounds and controls, and presentation of the concentration–response data. For BMNs which failed to elicit significant responses, a maximum response equal to that achieved by potent agonists in the same experiment was assumed in order to display these data on the normalized graphs. Each data point represents the mean value from at least five independent experiments ±s.e.m.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Amyloid-beta Fibrils Degradation by SVMPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aβ fibrils were detected using a thioflavin T (2-[4-(dimethylamino) phenyl]-3,6-dimethyl-1,3-benzothiazol-3-ium chloride, ThT) (Sigma-Aldrich) assay, as described previously [40 (link)]. The ThT assay is a β-sheet-specific fluorescence assay. Briefly, synthetic Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptides were mixed as follows: 0.1 mg/mL Aβ40 or Aβ42, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and 50 mM NaCl. The mixture was vortexed briefly and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. At 0 and 24 h, 5 μL of fibril mixture was aliquoted into a 96-well plate, mixed with 200 μL ThT solution (5 μM ThT, 100 mM glycine (pH 7.5)), and incubated for 5 min at room temperature in the dark. ThT fluorescence was analyzed using a Gemini XPS microplate spectrofluorometer (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) in endpoint mode with excitation and emission wavelengths of 440 and 480 nm, respectively. SoftMax Pro Software v5.4.1 (Molecular Devices) was used for data analysis. Fluorescence intensities were used after subtracting the value of the control (ThT solution without Aβ).
To analyze their ability to degrade Aβ fibrils, SVMPs were added before or after fibril formation, and the mixture was incubated for 24 h and subsequently subjected to a ThT assay using a control solution without SVMP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Measuring TTR Binding Affinity by FP Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The binding affinity of compound 1, AG10-L1-Nal, AG10-L2-Nal, and AG10-L2-Oxy to TTR in buffer was determined by their ability to displace FP probe from TTR using a Fluorescence Polarization (FP) assay32 (link). Serial dilutions of compound 1, AG10-L1-Nal, AG10-L2-Nal, and AG10-L2-Oxy (0.010 µM to 20 µM) were added to a solution of FP-probe (50 nM) and TTR (300 nM) in assay buffer (PBS pH 7.4, 0.01% Triton-X100, 1% DMSO in 25 μL final volumes) in a 384-well plate. The samples were allowed to equilibrate by agitation on a plate shaker for 20 minutes at room temperature. Fluorescence polarization (excitation λ 485 nm, emission λ 525 nm, cutoff λ 515 nm) measurements were taken using a SpectraMax M5 Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices). We used SoftMax® Pro software v5.4.1 (Molecular Devices, Inc.) to collect the fluorescence data. The IC50 values were obtained by fitting the data to the following equation [y = (A-D)/(1 + (x/C)^B) + D], where A = maximum FP signal, B = slope, C = apparent binding constant (Kapp), and D = minimum FP signal. The binding constant (Kd) values were calculated using the Cheng–Prusoff equation from the IC50 values. All reported data represent the mean ± s.d. (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying T-Cell Proliferation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate T-cell proliferation, 96-well microtiter plates were coated overnight with anti-mouse CD3 antibody (100 μl/well of 1 μg/ml solution of Clone 145–2C11; BD Biosciences) or anti-rat CD3 antibody (100 μl/well of 1 μg/ml solution of Clone G4.18; BD Biosciences) and then washed. Spleen cell suspensions from Cohort 4 animals were separated from red blood cells (RBC) using Ficoll-Paque Plus (GE Healthcare) density gradients. The isolated cells were then re-suspended in complete RPMI 1640 medium (RPMI containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin; Gibco ThermoFisher Scientific) at 5 × 106 cells/ml. From this suspension, 100 μl of cells (5 × 105/well) were added to appropriate wells, and the plates incubated at 37 °C (in 5% CO2) for up to 72 h. Changes in total cell number, indicative of proliferation, were measured using a fluorescent nucleic acid stain assay (CyQuant Direct Cell Proliferation; ThermoFisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY) according to manufacturer instruct-tions. The fluorescent signal (485 nm excitation/535 nm emission), directly proportional to live cell number and thereby an index of proliferation, was measured using a Spectramax M2e spectrofluorometer and associated Softmax Pro software v5.0 (Molecular Devices).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying T-Cell Proliferation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate T-cell proliferation, 96-well microtiter plates were coated overnight with anti-mouse CD3 antibody (100 μl/well of 1 μg/ml solution of Clone 145–2C11; BD Biosciences) or anti-rat CD3 antibody (100 μl/well of 1 μg/ml solution of Clone G4.18; BD Biosciences) and then washed. Spleen cell suspensions from Cohort 4 animals were separated from red blood cells (RBC) using Ficoll-Paque Plus (GE Healthcare) density gradients. The isolated cells were then re-suspended in complete RPMI 1640 medium (RPMI containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin; Gibco ThermoFisher Scientific) at 5 × 106 cells/ml. From this suspension, 100 μl of cells (5 × 105/well) were added to appropriate wells, and the plates incubated at 37 °C (in 5% CO2) for up to 72 h. Changes in total cell number, indicative of proliferation, were measured using a fluorescent nucleic acid stain assay (CyQuant Direct Cell Proliferation; ThermoFisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY) according to manufacturer instruct-tions. The fluorescent signal (485 nm excitation/535 nm emission), directly proportional to live cell number and thereby an index of proliferation, was measured using a Spectramax M2e spectrofluorometer and associated Softmax Pro software v5.0 (Molecular Devices).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Inflammatory Response in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After whole-body perfusion, the mouse right lung lobe and the spleen were used for quantification of bacterial CFU, and left lobe was used for H&E staining for counting inflammatory cells. BAL fluids were collected from the lungs after washing with ice-cold PBS (1 mL). After centrifugation at 1700 × g for 5 min, the supernatants were collected and stored at −80 °C. The pellets of BAL fluid were resuspended with 1 mL of 2% FBS in PBS and then counted using EVE™ automated cell counter (NanoEnTek). Total protein concentration in mouse BAL fluid was measured using Pierce™ BCA protein assay kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (23225; Thermo Scientific). Levels of IL-6 (DY406) and TNF-α (DY410) in mouse BAL fluid were quantified using DuoSet® ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The ELISA detection limits for IL-6 and TNF-α were consistently greater than pg/mL. The sample absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a VersaMax™ Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices). Data was analyzed with SoftMax® Pro Software v5.2 (Molecular Devices).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!