The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using plan apochromat 40x 1.3 oil dic m27

1

Immunostaining of Cells on Collagen Matrices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells seeded on top of collagen matrices were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Then, cells were permeabilised for 20 min using 0.3% Triton X-100 in 5% BSA-PBS, blocked in 5% BSA-PBS for 30 min and immunostained with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. Next, samples were incubated with Alexa FluorTM 546-phalloidin (A22283, Thermo Fisher, 1:400) and Goat anti-rabbit Alexa FluorTM 488 (A-11008, Thermo Fisher, 1:1000) or Goat anti-mouse Alexa FluorTM 488 (A-11029, Thermo Fisher, 1:1000) secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst prepared in PBS. Antibodies were diluted in 5% BSA-PBS.
Images were taken with a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta confocal microscope with Plan-Apochromat 40x/1.2 NA (water) objective lenses, Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope with Plan-Apochromat 40x/1.3 Oil DIC M27 and Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope with Airyscan superresolution mode and Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.4 Oil DIC M27 objective lenses (Carl Zeiss, Germany). Zen software was used to acquire images (Carl Zeiss, Germany). Images were analysed using ImageJ software (NIH). For pMLC2 quantification, fluorescence signal was quantified by calculating the area occupied by pMLC staining in single cells relative to the cell area. For pMLC2 distribution, line scan analysis was performed in Fiji 1.53t using the Plot profile plug in.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunostaining of Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded on glass coverslips and grown as a monolayer. They were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, #15710) for 10 min, permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma, #X100) in PBS for 5 min, and blocked in 3% bovine serum albumin (Proliant Biologicals, #68100) for one hour. Immunolabeling with primary and secondary antibodies was conducted for one hour at room temperature. Primary antibodies targeted: HA-Tag (C29F4; CST, #3724; dilution 1:500), sAC (R21; CEP Inc.; dilution 1:100), YAP (D8H1X; CST, #14074; dilution 1:100), and cytochrome C (2CYTC-199; Santa Cruz, #sc-81752; dilution 1:50). Secondary antibodies used were donkey anti-mouse and donkey anti-rabbit conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 647 (Thermo, #A-21206, #A-31571, #A-31573) and diluted 1:300. Coverslips were mounted on glass microscopy slides with ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Thermo, #P36931). Immunostained cells were imaged on a Zeiss LSM 880 Inverted laser scanning microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using a Plan-Apochromat 40x/1.3 Oil DIC M27 immersion lens. Images were acquired using ZenBlack operating software. Any quantitation performed, was done using raw data images. For the purpose of figure preparation, contrast and brightness was adjusted by applying exactly the same settings to images from control and experimental groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Neuroanatomical Analysis of Prelimbic Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coronal sections (300 µm) were obtained in the region located between 2.10 mm and 1.54 mm rostral to the bregma. Pyramidal neurons of the layer 2/3 in the prelimbic region of the medial prefrontal cortex were injected with biocytin. Streptavidin-conjugated HRP was used to label the injected neurons using a green fluorescent substrate. Each section was then mounted on a slide and confocal images were obtained using at The Light Microscopy Facility, the Max Planck Florida Institute, using a confocal microscope (LSM 780; Carl Zeiss; Plan Apochromat 40x/1.3 Oil DIC M27) at room temperature. Image acquisition and processing were accomplished using ZEN 2011 (64 bit) software (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with only minor manipulations of the images setting the fluorescence intensity in non-saturating conditions and maintaining similar parameters for each acquired image. Pictures were elaborated and spine density calculated using ImageJ and Neurolucida (MicroBrightField, Williston, VT) software. Only apical dendrites of second order were analyzed. At least three segments/neuron (>40 µm; average of 420 µm/mouse) with similar diameter (average of 1.06 ± 0.21 µm) that did not show intersections with other dendrites were considered for analysis. All measurements were performed by an experimenter blind to the mice genotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunostaining of Cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded on glass coverslips and grown as a monolayer. They were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, #15710) for 10 min, permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma, #X100) in PBS for 5 min, and blocked in 3% bovine serum albumin (Proliant Biologicals, #68100) for one hour. Immunolabeling with primary and secondary antibodies was conducted for one hour at room temperature. Primary antibodies targeted: HA-Tag (C29F4; CST, #3724; dilution 1:500), sAC (R21; CEP Inc.; dilution 1:100), YAP (D8H1X; CST, #14074; dilution 1:100), and cytochrome C (2CYTC-199; Santa Cruz, #sc-81752; dilution 1:50). Secondary antibodies used were donkey anti-mouse and donkey anti-rabbit conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 647 (Thermo, #A-21206, #A-31571, #A-31573) and diluted 1:300. Coverslips were mounted on glass microscopy slides with ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Thermo, #P36931). Immunostained cells were imaged on a Zeiss LSM 880 Inverted laser scanning microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using a Plan-Apochromat 40x/1.3 Oil DIC M27 immersion lens. Images were acquired using ZenBlack operating software. Any quantitation performed, was done using raw data images. For the purpose of figure preparation, contrast and brightness was adjusted by applying exactly the same settings to images from control and experimental groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

FRAP Analysis of Nuclear YAP Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) was performed on a Zeiss LSM 880 Inverted laser scanning microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) fitted with temperaturecontrolled and CO2 chamber for live cell work using a Plan-Apochromat 40x/1.3 Oil DIC M27 immersion lens. Images were acquired using ZenBlack operating software. EYFP-YAP expressing cells were seeded in 35 mm glass bottom dishes (MatTek). After 24 h incubation with or without doxycycline, nuclear region was bleached with 405 nm laser wavelength, to reduce nuclear EYFP-YAP signal by at least 70%. Recovery of EYFP-YAP signal inside the nucleus was measured every 5 seconds over indicated time. Mean fluorescent intensity data was normalized by setting the initial fluorescence signal (pre-bleach) to 100%, and the signal immediately after photo-bleaching (timepoint 0) to 0%. Normalized recovery of EYFP-YAP signal inside the nucleus is presented from timepoint 0s. EYFP-YAP fluorescence in adjacent, non-bleached nuclei remained constant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!