The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Qp2010 plus gc ms system

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan, Italy

The QP2010-PLUS GC-MS system is a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry instrument developed by Shimadzu. The system is designed to perform sensitive and accurate analysis of complex chemical samples by separating and detecting individual compounds.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using qp2010 plus gc ms system

1

Metabolomic Profiling of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolomics profiling was detected and processed by Chinese Academy of Sciences in Dalian based on methods described in previous studies [12 (link), 13 (link)]. Briefly, metabolomic analysis was conducted on ACQUITY Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC, Waters Corporation, Manchester, UK) system with ACQUITY UPLC BEH C8 1.7 μm (2.1 × 100 mm) column (Waters, Milford, MA) for positive ion metabolites separation setting at 50 °C and ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 1.8 μm (2.1 × 100 mm) column (Waters, Milford, MA) for negative ion metabolites separation setting at 50 °C. A QP 2010 Plus GC-MS system (Shimadzu, Japan) with a DB-5MS (30 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm, Agilent Technologies, USA) was used in GC-MS analysis. The procedures were performed in accordance with the manufacturers’ protocols of all devices. Then, raw data were converted to mzData formats via Agilent MassHunter Qualitative software (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The program XCMS (version 1.40.0) (https://xcmsonline.scripps.edu/) was used to preprocess the raw data, with the default parameters. In the quality control (QC) process, nearly 100% features in QC samples had relative standard deviation (RSD) distribution less than 30%, and were within 3SD, which demonstrated a satisfactory data quality. The resulting matrix was constructed by retention time, mass-to-charge ratio (m/z), and normalized ion intensities.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

GC-MS Qualitative Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GC–MS qualitative analysis was performed in a Shimadzu QP2010-Plus GC/MS system equipped with a TRB5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 µm film thickness) capillary column (Teknokroma, Barcelona, Spain) operating in the linear velocity mode. The carrier gas was helium 5.0 (Linde, Lisboa, Portugal), with a constant flow of 1 mL/min. Samples were dissolved in dichloromethane and automatically injected. Injections were performed in split mode, with a ratio of 1/9. The injector port was heated to 280 °C. The initial column temperature of 60 °C was held for 2 min, followed by a temperature ramp of 30 °C/min to 300 °C held for 15 min. All mass spectra were acquired in electron impact (EI) mode at 70 eV. The operate temperatures were 200 °C for MS ion source, and 250 °C for the liner interface. Analysis were performed in full scan mode with mass ranging from 10 to 800 m/z. Compounds were identified by matching the mass fragmentation patterns with those stored in the GC-MS mass spectral databases (Wiley 229 and NIST-National Institute of Standards and Technology libraries).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

GC-MS Analysis of Bioactive Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The most bioactive samples, F5 and F13, were analyzed by GC-MS using a Shimadzu QP2010-Plus GC/MS system according to the previously reported procedure [54 (link)]. A tentative identification of the major volatilized compounds of F5 and F13 fractions was performed by matching the mass fragmentation patterns with those in the GC-MS mass spectral databases (Wiley 229 and NIST-National Institute of Standards and Technology libraries).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Phellinus sulphurascens Oil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PSO (5 g) was hydrolyzed with 20 mL of 2 M KOH in methanol at 60°C for 30 min. The unsaponifiable fraction was extracted using the method of Wang et al. [17 ]; meanwhile, the saponifiable fraction was converted to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) and extracted into hexane according to the method of Zhou et al. [9 ]. For both fractions, the residues were dried under vacuum and weighed after the extraction solvents were removed. The percentage weight of unsaponifiable matters (Rum) and fatty acids (Rfa) in PSO was calculated as Wuf/Woil × 100% and (1 − Wuf/Woil) × 100%, respectively, where Wuf meant the weight of unsaponifiable fraction and Woil the weight of PSO. Then both residues were redissolved in hexane and subjected to analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using a Shimadzu QP2010 Plus GC-MS system (Kyoto, Japan) according to conditions previously reported [9 , 17 ]. Qualitative analysis was conducted by matching peak mass fragmentation patterns with those in NIST05 mass spectrum libraries, and quantitative analysis was carried out by normalizing peak areas to obtain the percentage content of each component, Pep, from which its rate in PSO (R) could be calculated by multiplying with Rum or Rfa.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative GC-MS Analysis of Seaweed Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis was employed to characterize and quantify bioactive substances in the seaweed extracts. Methanolic extracts were characterized quantitatively via GC-MS, according to slight modifications to the method adopted by Han et al. 2009 [21 (link)], using a Shimadzu QP2010 Plus GC-MS system. In the experimental procedure, 0.5 μL of the sample was separated on a Zebron ZB5-ms 30 m × 0.25 mm ID x 0.25 μm film thickness) column. The splitless injection was performed using a purge time of 1 min. Helium represented the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The column temperature was maintained at 50°C for 3 min, then programmed at 250°C for 10 min, and maintained at 250°C for 30 min. The inlet and the detector temperatures were set at 250°C, and the solvent cut time was set at 4.50 min. The identification of peaks was based on a computer-based program matching the mass spectra with those in the library for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NlST3208 and NIST 08s). This was done by comparing retention time data with that obtained for authentic laboratory standards. Individually detected peak areas were quantified and expressed as a percentage of total components detected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

GC-FID-MS Analysis of Essential Oil Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GC analyses were carried out on a Shimadzu 2010 GC-FID system and a Shimadzu QP2010 plus GC-MS system, provided with an AOC-20i automatic injector. Data were processed with Shimadzu GC Solution 2.53SU1 software and Shimadzu1224 PGCMS Solution 2.51 software, respectively (Shimadzu, Milan, Italy).
GC-FID-MS analyses were carried out on a Mega 5 column (95% polydimethyl-siloxane, 5% phenyl) 25 m×0.25 mm dc ×0.25 μm df, from MEGA (Milan, Italy).
Analysis conditions were as follows: injection mode: split; split ratio: 1:20; injection volume: 1 μl. Temperatures: injector:250°C, FID: detector: 280°C, MS: transfer line:280°C; ion source: 200°C; carrier gas: He, initial flow rate 1.0 ml/min in constant linear velocity mode. The temperature programme was from 50°C (1 min) to 250°C (10 min) at 3°C/min (5°C/min for Mega-Dex DMT-Beta column). The MS was operated in electron impact ionization mode at70 eV, with a mass range of 35–350 m/z in full scan mode.
EO components were identified by comparison of both their linear retention indices (ITs), calculated versus a C9-C25 hydrocarbon mixture, and their mass spectra to those of authentic samples, or to those reported in commercially available mass spectral libraries [22 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Serum Metabolite Extraction and GC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum was thawed on the ice, and a 50 μL of blood sample was drawn and mixed with 200 μL of methanol containing ISs (Supplemental Table s1). As previously described, supernatants were lyophilization-treated for subsequent oximation and silylation reactions [16 (link)]. Then, the supernatant was obtained for GC-MS analysis. A QP 2010 Plus GC-MS system (Shimadzu, Japan) with a DB-5MS (Agilent Technologies, USA) was used. A QC sample was inserted for every 10 samples to evaluate the data quality. The instrument and procedure of GC-MS analysis were described in the previous study [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

GC-MS Analysis of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GC-MS experiment was performed using a QP 2010Plus GC-MS system equipped with an AOC-20i auto-sampler (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The system utilized a DB-5 ms fused-silica capillary column (30 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm, J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA). The interface and ion source temperatures were set to 320 °C and 230 °C, respectively. High-purity helium was used as the carrier gas at a constant linear velocity of 40.0 cm/s. The initial oven temperature was 80 °C for 1 min, ramped to 210 °C at 30 °C/min, increased to 320 °C at 20 °C/min, and maintained for 4 min. An electron ionization source was used, and the ionization voltage was set to 70 eV. The mass scan range was 33–600 m/z, and the solvent delay was 2.92 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

GC-FID-MS Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses were carried out using a MPS-2 multipurpose sampler (Gerstel, Mülheim a/d Ruhr, Germany) installed on a Shimadzu GC-FID-MS system consisting of a Shimadzu GC 2010, equipped with FID, in parallel with a Shimadzu QP2010-PLUS GC-MS system; data were processed and elaborated using Shimadzu GCMS Solution 2.51 and GC Solution 2.53SU software (Shimadzu, Milan, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

GC-FID and GC-MS Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses were carried out on a Shimadzu GC-FID 2010 unit equipped with Shimadzu GC Solution 2.53U software and a Shimadzu GC 2010 -Shimadzu QP2010-PLUS GC-MS system equipped with GCMS 2.51 software (Shimadzu, Milan, Italy). FID was used to measure chromatographic parameters, and MS for identification purposes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!