The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using cary uv vis spectrophotometer

1

Quantifying Polyphenol Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total polyphenols content was evaluated using the Folin–Ciocalteu phenol reagent [25 (link)]. The absorbance at λ = 760 nm was determined at room temperature through a Cary UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Gallic acid represented the standard. Results were expressed as μg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g of the product ± standard deviation (SD). The concentration range for standard curve was between 34.02 μg and 680.04 μg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Determination of Mineral Content in Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the determination of minerals, approximately 100 mg of sample was weighed into a long-necked Kjeldahl flask and 2 mL of conc. HNO3 and 1 mL of conc. H2SO4 were added. The samples were digested with heating of the mixture over a burner flame until no gas was emitted. After that, 1 mL of 30% H2O2 was added to the cooled mixture and the mixture was heated again until it became clear. The clear liquid was then diluted to 50 mL with 1% HNO3. Using multi-point calibration curves, typical at 10 µg/L, 30 µg/L, 100 µg/L, 300 µg/L, and 1000 µg/L, with the Varian AX Vista ICP/OES instrument, the metal (K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Sr and Al) content in the solutions was then determined. All analyses were performed in duplicates.
The content of P was determined according to a vanadate–molybdate method [82 ]. The absorbance was measured at 406 nm using Varian Cary UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The contents of minerals were expressed as mean ± SE (% DW for K, Ca, Mg, P and mg/kg DW for Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Sr, and Al).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Total Phenolic Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total phenolic content was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method, described by Singleton and Rossi (1965) [40 ]. Eight hundred microliters of deionized water and 50 µL of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent were added to 50 µL of the suitably diluted extract. The mixture was kept for 6 min, then 100 µL of a 7% aqueous Na2CO3 solution was added. After 120 min, the absorption was measured at 760 nm against water as a blank, using a Cary UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The amount of total phenolics was expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g of extract.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Solubility of Prednisolone in Various Media

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The solubility of prednisolone (PRD) was assessed in different oils (OA, IPM, and LC), surfactants (TW-20 and LB), cosurfactants (ethanol, PG, PEG 400, and TC-P), and water, as previously described [16 (link)]. Briefly, PRD was added in excess to 2 mL of oils, surfactants, cosurfactants, and water in screwed test tubes. Samples were vortexed and kept to dissolve in an isothermal shaker maintained at 37 ± 1 °C for 24 h to equilibrate. Then, they were removed from the shaker, centrifuged for 15 min at 3500 rpm, and the supernatant was diluted suitably with methanol. The concentration of PRD was determined using UV spectrophotometry (Varian, Cary UV/VIS spectrophotometer) at 240 nm using a calibration curve created by preparing a set of PRD standard solutions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Solubility of CIP.HCl in Nanoemulsion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The solubility of CIP.HCl was determined in nanoemulsion components as follows: OA and IPM as oil phases; TW-20 and Labrasol® as surfactants; PG, PEG 400, and ethanol as cosurfactants; and 5% acetic acid and water as aqueous phases, as described in [49 (link)]. Briefly, an excess amount of CIP.HCl was dissolved in 3 mL of tested samples placed in 10 mL screwed-on test tubes. Samples were mixed using a vortex mixer and placed in a water bath at 37 °C for 24 h. Then samples were centrifuged at 3500× g for 15 min (Hermle Z326K centrifuge, Wehingen, Germany), and the supernatants were appropriately diluted with 0.1 N HCl. The concentration of CIP.HCl was assessed by UV-Vis spectrophotometry (Varian, Cary UV/Vis spectrophotometer) at a wavelength (λmax) of 277 nm, using a standard calibration curve of CIP.HCl prepared in 0.1 N HCl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extraction and Quantification of EVOO Polyphenols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction of polyphenols from EVOOs, necessary for the chromatographic analyses, was performed using hexane (1:1 w/v), following the method of Fratianni et al. [15 (link)]. The mixture was then charged onto cartridges SPE C18, and eluted three times with methanol. The three residues were pooled, dried, re-suspended in 1 mL of methanol and filtered through a 0.20 mm filter before the analysis. Total phenolic (TP) content was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent [16 ]. The absorbance at λ = 760 nm was determined (Cary UV/Vis spectrophotometer, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) at room temperature. A standard curve generated using gallic acid as standard was used to quantify total polyphenols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Determination of Total Polyphenols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total polyphenols (TP) of the extracts were determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method, as described by Singleton and Rossi Jr. [11 ]. Briefly, 50 μL of extract was added to 50 μL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent in 800 μL of distilled water. The reaction was neutralized with a sodium carbonate solution (20 g/100 mL). After incubation for 2 h at room temperature, the absorbance at λ = 760 nm was determined using a Cary UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Quantification was based on a standard curve generated using gallic acid. The results were expressed as μg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g of DW samples ± standard deviation (SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Spectroscopic Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Solvents used for the extraction and purification were reagent grade and distilled prior to being used. 1 H, 13 C and 2D NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance III 400 and 600 MHz spectrometers. The spectra were referenced according to the deuteriochloroform signals at δ H 7.24 and δ C 77.0 and dimethyl sulfoxide δ H 2.50 and δc 39.51 (for 1 H NMR and 13 C NMR spectra, respectively). The EIMS was measured on a ThermoFinnigan trace 132 GC, coupled with a Polaris Q mass spectrometer. IR spectra were recorded using a Perkin Elmer Universal ATR spectrometer. UV spectra were obtained on a Varian Cary UV-VIS Spectrophotometer. The melting points were determined on an Ernst Leitz Wetziar micro-hot stage melting point apparatus. Merck silica gel 60 (0.040-0.063 mm) was used for column chromatography and Merck 20 cm x 20 cm silica gel 60 F 254 aluminium sheets were used for TLC. The TLC plates were analyzed under UV (254 and 366 nm) before being sprayed and developed with anisaldehyde: concentrated sulfuric acid: methanol spray reagent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Anthocyanin Content Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amount of anthocyanins was determined by the differential pH method [13 ]. Absorbance was measured in a Cary UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Varian, USA), simultaneously at λ = 510 nm and λ = 700 nm in buffers of pH 1.0 and 4.5, using the formula A = (A510 − A700)pH1.0 − (A510 − A700)pH4.5. A molar absorption of 26,900 mol/cm was used for cyanidin-3-glucoside (molecular weight of 449.2 g/mol). Results were expressed as micrograms of cyanidin-3-glucoside equivalents/g of DW samples ± standard deviation (SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Total Phenolic Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A solution of methanol:acetic acid 99%:1% v/v was added to 10 g of a sample in a 2:1 v/w ratio (28 (link)). Samples were perfectly pounded and left for 24 h in the dark at 4°C. Then, they were centrifuged at 4 °C at 11,600 g (Biofuge, Beckman, Cassina de Pecchi, Italy) for 10 min. The removed, filtered, and dried supernatant was then resuspended in 10 ml of 80% ethanol, and ethyl acetate was added. This last step was repeated three times. The organic fraction obtained was then treated with sodium sulphate anhydrous, filtered, and dried again. The residue was resuspended in 1 ml of 50% methanol and stored at −26°C until the analysis. The colorimetric analysis of total phenolics followed the method of Singleton and Rossi (29 (link)) with Folin–Ciocalteu phenol as a reagent. The absorbance at λ = 760 nm was determined at room temperature with a Cary UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Quantification was based on a standard curve created using gallic acid (y = 0.497 x + 0.0239 R2 = 0.9908). The results are expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/100 g of fresh weight (FW) of the product ± SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!