The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rat anti mouse cd31 monoclonal antibody

Manufactured by BD
Sourced in United States

The Rat anti-mouse CD31 monoclonal antibody is a laboratory reagent used to detect and identify the presence of the CD31 antigen, also known as Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (PECAM-1), in mouse samples. It is a protein that plays a role in cell-cell adhesion and is expressed on the surface of endothelial cells, platelets, and certain immune cells.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using rat anti mouse cd31 monoclonal antibody

1

Quantifying Tumor Angiogenesis via CD31 Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD31 in tissue sections was stained using a rat anti-mouse CD31 monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) as described previously with some modifications45 (link). In brief, rat anti-mouse CD31 monoclonal antibody bound to CD31 in tissue sections was detected by using Rat-HRP Polymer, 1-Step (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA, USA) containing XM Factor (Biocare Medical) followed by using DAB solution (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA).
Viable tumour areas were determined for each tumour tissue section by using a fluorescence microscope (BZ-X710; Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Japan). The CD31-stained area and the total viable cell area were calculated by using BZ-Analyzer (version 1.2.0.1; Keyence Corporation). Microvessel density was calculated by dividing the CD31-stained area by the total viable cell area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of Tumor Angiogenesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fragments of resected tumor xenografts from nude mice were fixed in Zinc Formalin Fixative (BD Bioscience) for 1 day and then paraffin-embedded. Cross-sections were prepared and stained with rat anti-mouse CD31 monoclonal antibody (BD Bioscience) using Histofine Simple Stain Mouse MAX PO (Rat) and DAB substrate kits (Nichirei Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan) at Histo Science Laboratory (Tokyo, Japan). Tissue morphology was visualized by H&E staining. Quantification of vascular morphology, microvessel density (MVD) and mean vascular area (MVA) were conducted using the Aperio Microvessel Analysis algorithm (Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany). Vascular morphological profiles in selected regions were measured using Microvessel Analysis v1 software within an Aperio ImageScope (v10.0.36.1805; Leica Biosystems). To calculate the proportion (%) of small and large vessels, a piecewise threshold of vascular area (200 μm2) was selected. For CA9/CD31 double staining, biotinylated anti-mouse CD31 monoclonal antibody (BD Bioscience) with streptavidin-Alexa660 (Life Technologies) and rabbit anti-CA9 antibody (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA) with AlexaFluor488 donkey anti-rabbit antibody (Life Technologies) were used. Fluorescent images were captured using a BIOREVO fluorescence microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Angiogenesis and Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen tumor sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd.). Collagen was stained using a Masson’s trichrome staining kit (25088-100, Polysciences, Inc.). For immunochemical staining, frozen tumor sections were fixed in 10% formalin for 10 min at room temperature. After washing with 1 × TBS, sections were incubated with 0.3% H2O2 in methanol at room temperature, followed by washing in 1 × TBS. To inhibit non-specific staining, sections were incubated in serum-free protein block solution (X0909, Dako) for 15 min at room temperature. The sections were then incubated with primary antibodies: rat anti-mouse CD31 monoclonal antibody (BD557355, BD Biosciences, 1:100) or rat anti-mouse F4/80 monoclonal antibody (MCA497, Bio-Rad, 1:100). After washing with 1 × TBS, signal stain boost IHC detection reagent (anti-rabbit, Cell Signaling Technology) or rabbit anti-rat IgG H&L (horseradish peroxidase conjugated) (ab6734, Abcam, 1:500) was added, and sections were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. After reaction with diaminobenzidine (8059S, Cell Signaling Technology), sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. A BZ-X710 microscope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan) was used for histologic observation and evaluation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Pericyte-Covered Vessels in Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We defined pericyte-covered vessels as endothelial cells were fully surrounded or partially surrounded by αSMA positive cells as described previously [33 (link),34 (link)]. Briefly, 8-μm frozen sections were fixed with cold acetone and immunostained with rat anti-mouse CD31 monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and mouse anti-α-SMA monoclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) by the ABC and LSAB methods using a Vectastain ABC kit (Funakoshi, Tokyo, Japan) and LSAB kit (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Adjacent sections were routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin. All histological specimens were viewed under a CCD Hyper Scope (Keyence, Osaka, Japan) and analyzed using Image Tool software (Image Tool, Roswell, GA). MVD was determined as the mean of four or five fields per cross-section. Pericyte coverage was calculated based on the ratio of the double-staining vessels per total vessel count in the hotspot areas. Human tumor specimens were purchased from SuperBioChips (Seoul, South Korea). The human tumor specimens were double-stained with mouse anti-human CD31 monoclonal antibody (Dako) and alkaline phosphatase-labeled mouse anti-α-SMA monoclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) using an Envision HRP kit (Dako) and the LSAB kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cardiac Inflammation Markers in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three random cardiac sections for each mouse were immunostained using rat anti-mouse CD31 monoclonal antibody (0.3 µg/ml, BD Pharmingen), rabbit anti-mouse MCP-1 antibody (10 µg/ml, abcam), rabbit anti-mouse Il-1β antibody (1 µg/ml, abcam), rat anti-mouse TNFα antibody (25 µg/ml, BD Pharmingen), and a corresponding isotype control antibody. The appropriate biotinylated secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories) was applied for 30 min at RT. Immunostaining of cardiac sections was performed with a streptavidin-biotin-immunoperoxidase method (Vectostatin ABC-Peroxidase and diaminobenzidine; Vector Laboratories) per the manufacturer's protocol. Samples were imaged on an Olympus BX50F-3 microscope using 200x (for CD31) or 400x (for MCP-1, Il-1β, TNFα) magnification. The percentages of MCP-1-positive, Il-1β-positive, and TNFα-positive cells were counted from three random areas in the infarcted myocardium of each heart sample (n = 3) or the matching heart level for the healthy control and were referred to a certain tissue area (mm2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Quantification of Microvessel Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microvessel density (MVD) in tumor tissues was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining of CD31 (rat anti-mouse CD31 monoclonal antibody; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Tumor samples from freshly frozen tissues were collected on indicated days. MVD (%) was calculated from the ratio of the CD31-positive staining area to the total observation area in the viable region. Three to six fields per section were randomly analyzed, excluding necrotic areas. Positive staining areas were calculated by using imaging analysis software (WinROOF; Mitani Corporation, Fukui, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Angiogenesis Assay with Cytodex Beads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ethanol, fibrinogen, aprotinin and thrombin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and SU5416 was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). Rat anti-mouse CD31 monoclonal antibody was obtained from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA, US), while anti-VEGF antibody was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Dallas, TX, USA). Cytodex 3 beads were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc. (Piscataway, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Tumor Lymphangiogenesis and Metastasis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight micrometer-thick frozen tumor sections were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and blocked in 5% normal donkey serum in an antibody dilution buffer consisting of PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100. Sections were then incubated overnight in primary antibody (rat anti-mouse CD31 monoclonal antibody; Clone: MEC 13.3, 1:200 dilution, BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) or rabbit anti-mouse LYVE1 polyclonal antibody (1:200 dilution, Angiobio Co., Del Mar, CA) at 4 °C, and labeled with a fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI and are seen in blue. Samples were observed with a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The number of lymphatic vessels within the tumor was counted in six fields per section: the center regions of the tumor (to measure intra-tumor vessel density) and within an area 1 mm from the tumor border (to measure peri-tumor vessel density). Seven slide sections per mouse were analyzed. To determine the metastasis of SW620 tumor cells to the mouse lateral axillary lymph nodes, lungs, and liver, sections of mouse lymph nodes, lungs, and liver (seven slide sections per mouse) were stained with H&E and rabbit anti-CCR7 monoclonal antibody (Clone: Y59, 1:200 dilution, Abcam Inc. Cambridge, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Tumor Angiogenesis via CD31 Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surgically removed Panc02 tumors were embedded and frozen in OCT compound. Cryostat sections (8-μm thick) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and blocked with 1% BSA in DPBS. The sections were incubated with rat anti-mouse monoclonal CD31 antibody (1:100 dilution) (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lake, NJ, USA) followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (1:300 dilution) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and counterstaining with DAPI. Images were taken with a confocal laser scanning microscope (TCS SC8, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), and pixel values of the CD31-positive areas were calculated for each image to determine the tumor vessel density using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Tumor Angiogenesis via CD31 Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vessel density in P29mtP29 and P29mtB82M tumours was determined by staining tissue sections for CD31. For this purpose, surgically removed tumours were immediately embedded and frozen in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound. Next, cryostat sections (8-µm thick) were cut and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) and then incubated with rat anti-mouse monoclonal CD31 antibody (BD Biosciences, 550274, 1:100). After being washed with DPBS, the sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11007, 1:300) for 1 h. After counterstaining with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), the sections were observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Fluoview FV1000, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The pixel values of the CD31-positive areas were calculated for each image to determine the tumour vessel density using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!