The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using azithromycin

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was conducted on the isolates using the disk-diffusion method according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [11 ]. Antimicrobial substances included ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefazolin, cefotaxime, cefepime, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, fosfomycin, azithromycin, nitrofurantoin, streptomycin, kanamycin, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline (Becton, Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). Results were interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints for human clinical isolates [11 ]. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobials, counting beta-lactams as one class.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disk-diffusion method and the antibiotics ampicillin (AM), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC), cefazolin (CZ), cefotaxime (CTX), cefepime (FEP), nalidixic acid (NA), ciprofloxacin (CIP), gentamicin (GM), kanamycin (K), streptomycin (S), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT), fosfomycin (FOS), azithromycin (AZM), nitrofurantoin (F/M), chloramphenicol (C) and tetracycline (T) (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). Results were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) performance standards [28 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The resistance of S. aureus isolates to antimicrobial agents was determined by disk diffusion and interpreted according to the CLSI document no. M02-A11.14 The following drugs were used for the test: penicillin, erythromycin, azithromycin, roxithromycin, clindamycin, lincomycin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, tetracycline, amikacin, tobramycin, netilmicin, gentamicin, fusidic acid, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, vancomycin (all from Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and mupirocin (Oxoid). Multidrug resistance was defined as resistance to antimicrobial agents from at least three various classes. For isolates identified as resistant to erythromycin but susceptible to clindamycin, D-test was performed to detect inducible clindamycin resistance. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for vancomycin was determined by E-tests, in line with the manufacturer’s instructions (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for Enterobacteriaceae in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) performance standards [61 ] using the disk-diffusion method on Mueller Hinton plates (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) and the antibiotics ampicillin (AM), amoxicillin with clavulanic acid (AMC), azithromycin (AZM), cefazolin (CZ), cefepime (FEP), cefotaxime (CTX), chloramphenicol (C), ciprofloxacin (CIP), fosfomycin (FOS), gentamicin (G), kanamycin (K), nalidixic acid (NA), nitrofurantoin (F/M), streptomycin (S), sulfamethoxazole trimethoprim (SXT) and tetracycline (TE) (Becton Dickinson, Allschwil, Switzerland). Results were interpreted according to CLSI standards [61 ]. For azithromycin, an inhibition zone of ≤12 mm was interpreted as resistant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Citrobacter and E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AST was performed using the disk diffusion method according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2020 ). Antimicrobial substances included ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefazolin, cefotaxime, cefepime, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole‐trimethoprim, fosfomycin, azithromycin, nitrofurantoin, streptomycin, kanamycin, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline (Becton, Dickinson). Results were interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints for human clinical isolates (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2020 ). In the absence of clinical breakpoints for azithromycin resistance in Citrobacter spp. and E. coli, a zone diameter of ≤12 mm was interpreted as resistant, based on data reported by Meerwein et al. (2020 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the disc-diffusion method according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [31 ], and the antibiotics ampicillin (AM), amoxicillin with clavulanic acid (AMC), azithromycin (AZM), cefazolin (CZ), cefepime (FEP), cefotaxime (CTX), chloramphenicol (C), ciprofloxacin (CIP), fosfomycin (FOS), gentamicin (G), kanamycin (K), nalidixic acid (NA), nitrofurantoin (F/M), streptomycin (S), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT) and tetracycline (TE) (Becton Dickinson, Allschwil, Switzerland). Results were interpreted according to CLSI performance standards [31 ]. For azithromycin, an inhibition zone of less than or equal to 12 mm was interpreted as resistant. For isolates harbouring mcr-1, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of colistin was determined by broth microdilution according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), 2019 (eucast.org). The results were interpreted according to the breakpoints suggested by EUCAST for Enterobacterales (susceptible, MIC ≤ 2 mg l−1; resistant, MIC > 2 mg l−1).
Isolates displaying resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobials were defined as multidrug-resistant (MDR), as proposed by Magiorakos et al. [32 (link)], counting β-lactams as one class.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disk diffusion method with commercially available disks. The disks used included ampicillin (AMP10), ceftriaxone (CRO30), chloramphenicol (C30), erythromycin (E15), gentamicin (GM10), nalidixic acid (NA30), ciprofloxacin (CIP5), ofloxacin (OFX5), norfloxacin (NOR10), meropenem (MEM30), streptomycin (STR10), azithromycin (AZM15), tetracycline (TET30), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT1.25/23.75), neomycin (N30) (Becton Dickinson, Sparks Glencoe, MD, USA) in accordance with the criteria recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [15 ]. According to CLSI guidelines, breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae were used to determine antimicrobial susceptibility. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a quality control strain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of isolates was performed using the disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton Agar (Condalab, Spain) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline for the following antibiotics: penicillin (10 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), sulfamethoxazole (23/75 μg), tazobactam (10 μg) + piperacillin (100 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), meropenem (10 µg), clindamycin (2 μg), clarithromycin (15 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), azithromycin (15 μg) (BD-BBL Company, USA). The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of colistin and vancomycin was determined using the broth microdilution method. Bacterial isolates resistant to three or more different antimicrobial classes were identified as MDR isolates. S. aureus (ATCC 25923) and E. coli (ATCC 25922) were used as control strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty antibiotic agents (Hangzhou Binhe Microorganism Reagent Co., Ltd) were used, including cefotazime (30 µg), cephradine (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), amox-icillin (20 µg) and ampicillin (10 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), enrofloxacin (10 µg), norfloxacin (10 µg), spectinomycin (100 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), streptomycin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), kanamycin (30 µg), doxycycline (30 µg), lincomycin (30 µg), azithromycin (15 µg), polymyxin B (300 µg) and trimethoprim (23.75/1.25 µg).
Each purified isolates of tested bacteria were evenly spread onto a tryptic soy agar plate (TSA, BD TM , USA) that had been coated with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide liquid (NAD, Guangzhou Saiguo Biotech, China) and bovine serum (Zhejiang Tianhang Biotechnology, China). The antimicrobial discs were placed onto the surface of the agar. The plates were then incubated at 37 o C for about 24 h. The inhibition zone diameter was measured and compared with standardized CLSI interpretive criteria to designate the isolate as sensitive, intermediate or resistant to the drug (CLSI, 2018) . In this study, the isolates that showed intermediate were classified as resistant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used antibiogram test according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline using the disc agar diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (CONDA, Spain), using the following antibiotics: cefepime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), Azithromycin (15 μg), imipenem (10 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), Clindamycin (2 μg), tetracycline (30 µg), clarithromycin (15 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg) (BD-BBL Company, USA). E. coli ATCC 25922 and S. aureus ATCC 25923 were used as quality control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!