The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using trim29

1

Multiparametric Immunofluorescence Analysis of FFPE Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole tissue sections from LC03 and LC07 (4‐μm‐thick formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded) were stained with primary antibodies (EpCAM (#2929, CST, 1:500), CD163(#93498, CST, 1:200), Topoisomerase IIα (#12286, CST,1:400), TRIM29(17542‐1‐AP, Proteintech, 1:100), DKK1(Abcam, ab109416, 1:800) sequentially and paired with TSA 7‐colour kit (abs50015‐100T, Absinbio). The order of antibodies/fluorescent dyes was showed as following: anti‐ EpCAM/TSA 480, anti‐ CD163/TSA 780, anti‐TOPIIα/TSA 620, anti‐TRIM29/TSA 520, anti‐DKK1/TSA 570 and then by staining with DAPI (D1306; Thermo Fisher). Pictures were scanned with Aperio Versa 8 tissue imaging system (Leica). Images were analysed using Indica Halo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoblot and Immunoprecipitation Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunoblot assays, NPC or HEK293T cells were subjected to lysis in ice-cold low-salt lysis buffer (LSB, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 1.5 mM MgCl2,1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100) supplemented with 5 mg/mL protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Aliquots of 20–25 μL extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE. For IP assays, NPC or HEK293T cells were transfected with corresponding expression vectors for indicated times, then FLAG- or Myc-tagged proteins were pulled down using FLAG-beads (Sigma -Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or Myc-beads (Immuoway, Newark, DE, USA). The following antibodies were used which were directed to: FLAG (Sigma, A8592), β-actin (Sigma, A2228), HA (Roche Applied Science, clone 3F10), Myc (Roche Applied Science, 11814150001), STING (Proteintech, IL, USA, 19851-1-AP), TRIM29 (Proteintech, 17542-1-AP).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted using Pierce lysis buffer (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Protein quantification was performed using the Bradford method. A 50 μg sample of protein was added to sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Bradford, MA). Incubation of primary antibodies was performed overnight at 4°C. Antibody dilution was as follows: TRIM29 (1:800, Proteintech), p-PKC, p-IκB, cyclin D1, cyclin E, Bcl-2 (1:1,000, Cell Signaling, Boston, MA), and mouse monoclonal antibody against β-actin (1:2,000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). This was followed by incubation with HRP-coupled anti-mouse or rabbit IgG antibody (1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) at 37°C for 2 hours. Target proteins on polyvinylidene difluoride membrane were visualized using a Pierce ECL kit and captured using a DNR BioImaging System (DNR, Jerusalem, Israel).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

IHC Analysis of Subcutaneous Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collected subcutaneous tumors were fixed with 4% formalin, embedded in paraffin and then sectioned into 4-μm-slices. The standard protocol for IHC of the TMAs and subcutaneous tumors using a streptavidin-peroxidase (SP) Kit (Zhongshan biotech, Beijing, China), as described previously [25 (link)]. The slides were incubated with antibodies specific for TFAP2C (Abcam, cambridge, MA, USA), TRIM29 (Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA), PHLPP1 (Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA), p-AKT (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and Ki-67 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). The images of IHC staining were obtained by an Olympus microscope (Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!