The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

37 protocols using w plan apochromat

1

Confocal Raman Spectral Acquisition Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal Raman spectral acquisition was performed on a Raman micro-spectroscope (alpha300R + , WITec, Ulm, Germany). The light source used was a 785 nm laser (Toptica XTRA II) with a 63 × /1.0 NA water immersion microscope objective lens (W Plan-Apochromat, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The scattered light was collected via a 100 μm fibre with a 600 groove mm−1 grating spectrograph (UHTS 300, WITec, Ulm, Germany) and spectra were acquired using a thermoelectrically cooled back-illuminated CCD camera (iDus DU401-DD, Andor, Belfast, UK) with a spectral resolution of 3 cm−1 and 85 mW laser power at the sample. Laser control was performed remotely via a serial connection and custom MATLAB (2016b, The Mathworks, MA, USA) scripts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Astrocyte Fluorescence Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Astrocytes were loaded with fluorescent dye Alexa Fluor 594 through the patch pipette that was used for electrophysiological recordings. Images were collected with W Plan-APOCHROMAT 40×/1.0 water-immersion objective, using the Zeiss LSM 7 MP system (Carl Zeiss, Germany) coupled with Ti:sapphire broadband laser multi‐photon system Chameleon Vision II (Coherent, UK) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multi-photon Imaging of Neuronal Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed on a custom-built two-photon microscope with custom acquisition software as previously described (24 ). Briefly, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (0.75 to 1.25%) and secured in a stereotaxic frame. YFP was excited with a Mai Tai HP Ti:Sapphire laser (Spectra-Physics) at 915 nm. After scanning with galvanometric XY-scanning mirrors (6215H, Cambridge Technology) and a piezo actuator Z-positioning system (Piezosystem Jena), the laser beam was focused by a 20×/1.0-NA water immersion objective lens (W Plan-Apochromat, Zeiss) to the same focal volume location in the specimen. The laser produces ∼100-fs unsynchronized pulses at a rate of 80 MHz, and the final power onto the window ranges from approximately 35 to 50 mW. The emission signals were collected by the same objective lens, passed through an infrared blocking filter, and separated by dichroic mirrors and bandpass filters to collect the YFP emission signal from 520 to 560 nm onto a photomultiplier tube. Imaging was performed at high resolution (250 nm/pixel XY resolution, 0.9 μm/frame Z resolution). Two-photon raw scanner data were processed for spectral linear unmixing and converted into a red-green-blue (RGB) image z stack using MATLAB and ImageJ (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Two-Photon Imaging of Embryonic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in Danieau’s solution at 4°C overnight. The next day, embryos were washed with Danieau’s solution and then permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X in Danieau’s solution for 30 min. Subsequently, embryos were incubated for 10 min in DAPI (1 µg/ml) and then washed several times with Danieau’s solution. Embryos were placed in an inverted agarose holder and covered with Danieau’s solution for imaging. An upright Zeiss LSM 780 NLO microscope equipped with a coherent Chameleon Vision II infrared laser was used for two-photon excitation (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). DAPI was excited with 780 nm and detected using a non-descanned GaAsP detector (BIG-Module) with BP450/60 or SP485. Samples were imaged with either a Zeiss W Plan-Apochromat 20 × 1.0 or 40 × 1.0 dipping objective. Images were acquired using a four tile scan of multiple z-sections (3–3.5 µm steps). Tiles were stitched with the ZEN software (RRID:SCR_013672, Zeiss). Images were imported into the Imaris software (RRID:SCR_007370, Bitplane, Belfast, Northern Ireland) and the spot tool was used to calculate cell number.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Raman Imaging of Immobilized Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To immobilize giant
vesicles, calcium fluoride slides were pretreated with 10 mg/mL protamine
(Protamine sulfate salt from salmon, Sigma) for 10 min. After 5 washes
with DPBS, 20 μL of vesicle suspension was incubated on slides
for 1 h, before 20 washes with DPBS. Vesicles were imaged using the
alpha 300R+ confocal Raman microscope (Witec GmBH, Germany). A 35
mW, 532 nm laser light source was shone through a 63× 1.0 NA
water immersion objective lens (W Plan-Apochromat, Zeiss, Germany).
Raman scattering was collected through the same lens and directed
via a 100 μm diameter silica fiber to a 600 groove/mm spectrograph
(UHTS 300, WITec, GmbH, Germany) coupled to a back-illuminated charge-coupled
device camera, cooled to −60 °C. Area scans of vesicles
were imaged with 500 × 500 XY nm resolution. Spectral preprocessing
was performed with ProjectFIVE software (Witec GmBH). First, cosmic
rays were removed, and then the dark current background was subtracted,
followed by “shape” background correction. Spectra were
normalized to the maximum intensity of the water peak at 3000–3400
cm–1. Finally, Raman images were reconstructed from
univariate analysis of the intensity of the NH2 signal at 2208 cm–1 and the SO3 signal at 2220 cm–1. Due to low intensity of the 708 cm–1 polymer
peak with this instrumental setup, Raman images of polymer signal
were reconstructed from 2905 cm–1 polymer peak.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Imaging Periosteal Surface of Tibia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The two ends of left tibiae were rigidly fixed in a custom-made holder placed inside in an imaging chamber containing phosphate buffered saline (PBS, ~120mL) at room temperature (25°C) (Fig. 2A). The anterior-medial periosteal surface of the tibial shaft, located 20-30% distal from the proximal end, was selected for the experiment (Fig. 2B). This region was chosen because i) it is relatively flat and in focus within a microscope-imaging plane (xy) and ii) the local tracer penetration could be simplified as a one-dimensional (z) mathematic problem by neglecting bone curvature. After the region of interest on the periosteal surface was identified, the bone was imaged with an inverted confocal laser-scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 510, Carl Zeiss Inc., Thornwood, NY) equipped with a lens inverter (LSM Technology, Etters, PA) and a 20× 1.0 numerical aperture water dipping lens (W Plan-Apochromat, Zeiss) (Fig. 2A). The “L” shaped lens inverter alters the laser path so that the tibia with its periosteal surface facing up could be imaged from the top.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Cross-Linked Dermal Scaffolds and Epidermal Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the effect of cross-linking (NXL,
DHT, EDAC) on the ability of the dermal CG scaffold layer to support
the iEC, iSC coculture and the forming of a vascular structure in
3D and the ability of the epidermal CCh film layer to support the
proliferation of keratinocytes, the CG scaffolds/CCh films were fluorescently
stained. Cell-seeded scaffolds were fixed overnight at 4 °C in
10% formalin (Sigma-Aldrich, Ireland) after 7 days of culture, and
CCh films were fixed for 30 min in 10% formalin after 3 days of culture.
For cytoskeleton staining, the scaffolds/films were incubated in Phalloidin-Atto
488 (Sigma-Aldrich, Ireland) (1:600 in PBS) (1 h, RT). Nuclei staining
was carried out using DAPI (500 μL per scaffold, 1 μg/mL
in PBS) (20 min, RT). Following staining, the scaffolds/films were
imaged using a Carl Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope, with an N-Achroplan
10× (N.A. 0.3) and W Plan-Apochromat 20× (N.A. 1.0) objective.
Image analysis was carried out using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Lymph Node Imaging of Labeled Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BALB/c mice (n = 3) were injected s.c. between the scapulae with EcN OMVs (100 µg) and/or splenic DCs (1×106 cells), stained with DiO and DiD respectively (Invitrogen), then euthanized after 4 days. After euthanasia, intact draining cervical lymph nodes were resected, placed in PBS, and immediately imaged via two-photon excited fluorescence microscopy on a custom setup. Imaging was conducted on a custom-designed microscope using a train of 830-nm, 90-MHz, 140-fs pulses from a Ti:sapphire laser oscillator (Chameleon; Coherent) for excitation. Laser scanning and data acquisition were controlled by ScanImage software [34] (link). For high-resolution imaging of labeled cells and particles respectively a 20X (numerical aperture: 1.0) water-immersion objective (Zeiss; W Plan-APO Chromat). Second harmonic generation from the extracellular matrix in lymph node was detected using a 417-nm centered wavelength filter. Fluorescence was detected using emission filters with 510-nm and 641-nm center wavelength with 65-nm bandwidth to image. Images shown are 20 µm stacks that were compiled using a maximum projection and a median filter was applied using Image J software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Visualizing SG Microvasculature with PEGASOS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The anatomy of SGs and their surrounding microvasculature was visualized based on the PEGASOS methods [24 (link)]. Briefly, adult CAG-tdTomato mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital (50 mg kg−1) by an intraperitoneal injection. Hind feet, provided with major interdigital pads, were isolated from the mice after tail vein injection of Lycopersicon Esculentum lectin (500 μg mL−1; Thermofisher, L32472) and transcardiac perfusion. Following tissue fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (Solarbio, China) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) rinse for 24 h, the samples were cleared over 7 days and imaged within the light sheet chamber. All specimens were scanned using a Zeiss Z.1 Light-sheet microscope equipped with W Plan-Apochromat 20 × /1.0 objective at a 2 μm step size. Image collection, processing and 3D rendering was carried out with a Precision T7600 workstation (Dell, USA). 3D reconstruction images and movies were generated using Imaris 9.7 (Bitplane, Switzerland). Stack images were generated using the “volume rendering” function. 3D images were generated using the “snapshot” function. Movies were generated using “animation” function.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In Vivo Two-Photon Imaging of Cortical Microglia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A round cranial window (4 mm diameter) was drilled under general anesthesia (fentanyl, 0.05 mg/kg; midazolam, 5 mg/kg; medetomidine, 0.50 mg/kg) as previously described13 (link). The mice were kept under general anesthesia for the entire imaging period and were directly transferred to the microscope after the completion of the surgery. Body temperature was controlled and kept steady at 37 °C. The craniotomy was enclosed by a custom-made head fixation ring which allowed for the head fixation of the mouse in the two-photon microscopy setup. In vivo imaging was performed using a custom-built, fully motorized, two-photon microscope equipped with a Coherent Chameleon Ultra II laser and a Zeiss W Plan-Apochromat 40×/numerical aperture 1.0 objective. The microscope is motorized and controlled by a Sutter MP285 via ScanImage (version 3.8). Microglia were imaged using a 900 nm excitation wavelength and were detected via non-descanned detectors and an ET525/50m-2P emission filter (Chroma Technology). 40–50 µm-thick z-stacks were collected using ScanImage at 1024 × 1024 pixels at a depth of approximately 100–200 µm below the cortical surface. Laser power was kept constant for each experiment and did not exceed 45 mW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!