The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Salivette sampling device

Manufactured by Sarstedt
Sourced in Germany, Canada

The Salivette is a sampling device used for the collection of saliva samples. It consists of a soft cotton swab enclosed in a plastic tube. The device is designed to facilitate the easy and hygienic collection of saliva for various analytical purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

33 protocols using salivette sampling device

1

Hydrocortisone Effects on Corpus Callosum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants took part in two test sessions which took place between 2 and 6 p.m. at the Ruhr University Bochum, Germany, to minimize variance in cortisol data due to circadian changes in cortisol (42 (link)). After providing written informed consent, participants completed baseline subjective stress measurements and the first saliva sample was taken. Subjective stress was assessed with the Subjective Experiences Rating Scale [SERS; (45 (link))]. Participants were given either two tablets of 10 mg hydrocortisone (Jenapharm®, Jena; Germany) each or a placebo. The dosage of 20 mg has been used in previous studies by our group and showed an influence on learning and memory processes (46 (link), 47 (link)). Hydrocortisone and placebo conditions were pseudo-randomized between participants. Subsequently, participants waited 40 min before proceeding with the experiment. This time was used to set up participants with the EEG cap. Following this, participants underwent a 5 min resting state EEG recording and performed two tasks measuring information transfer across the corpus callosum in a pseudorandom order. Between these tasks, saliva samples were collected. In parallel, we assessed the effect of the participants (see Figure 1). Salivary samples were collected using Salivette sampling devices (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Endocrine Responses to Aggression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Endocrinological response to the TAP was measured using salivary cortisol and testosterone. Saliva samples were taken twice prior to the TAP and three times following aggression induction (Fig. 1). Saliva for cortisol analysis was collected using Salivette sampling devices (Sarstedt, Numbrecht, Germany). Saliva for testosterone analysis was sampled in SafeSeal micro tubes (Sarstedt, Numbrecht, Germany), because collection with the Salivette cotton swabs may introduce artifacts in the analyses of testosterone38 (link). To limit the influence of diurnal variation on hormonal levels, all experimental procedures and samplings were performed in the afternoon between 3:00 and 6:00 PM39 (link),40 (link). Participants were instructed to refrain from drinking and eating for at least half an hour and from physical exercise and smoking two hours before the experiment. Saliva samples were stored uncentrifuged at −20 °C until assay. Cortisol and testosterone levels were assayed at the Department of Psychology of the Dresden University of Technology by using a luminsescence immunoassay, with a lower limit of detection of 1.8 pg/ml for testosterone and 0.276 nmol/L for cortisol. The mean and intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 8% for both hormones.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Stress-Induced Cortisol and Cardiovascular Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As a marker of SNS activity, blood pressure was measured 1 min before, during and 1 min after stress induction using Dinamap vital signs monitor (Critikon, Tampa, FL; cuff placed on the left upper arm).
We assessed free salivary cortisol concentrations at four different times; at baseline and 1, 25, and 45 min after completion of the SECPT or control condition. Saliva was collected using Salivette sampling devices (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) and kept in a freezer until biochemical analysis. Free cortisol levels served as a measure of HPA axis activity and were determined by commercial immunoassays (CLIA; IBL International, Hamburg, Germany). Inter and intra assay variations were below 10%.
Directly after the stressor or control procedure participants rated on a scale from 0 (“not at all”) to 100 (“very much”) how stressful, painful and unpleasant they had felt during the procedure (rating method adopted from Schwabe et al., 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Saliva Cortisol Sampling and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Saliva samples were collected between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. The passive drooling method was used for collecting a single saliva sample over a period of 5 min while the participants responded to the survey questions. Saliva was collected in Salivette sampling devices (Sarstedt, Rommelsdorf, Germany) and kept frozen until it was analyzed. Salivary cortisol was measured using the Salivary Cortisol ELISA kit (Salimetrics, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The assay is based on a competitive immunoassay (ELISA) method. The minimal detectable concentration of the method is 0.007 ug/dL. The intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variations are 3–7% and 3–11%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Salivary Cortisol Changes in Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Saliva cortisol samples were collected directly before the first treatment session (T1), immediately after the first one (T2) and immediately after the second treatment session (T3), using Salivette® sampling devices (Sarstedt, Germany). On doing so the patients chewed on a cotton roll for the duration of about two minutes. The samples were immediately chilled on ice and centrifuged at 2400 x g for 2 minutes at 4°C. Then the samples were chilled on ice again and after the procedure of the presentation of the two treatment methods they were frozen in aliquots at -80°C until assayed. Cortisol levels (nmol/l) were determined using the commercially available immunoassay ELISA-Kit Parameter™ Cortisol Assay (R&D Systems, Inc., USA). According to the manufacturer the assay sensitivity for the kit was 0.111 nmol/l. Intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 5.4% and 9.3%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Salivary Cortisol Stress Response Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Salivary free cortisol is a reliable and valid measure of the biologically active fraction of cortisol (Vining et al., 1983 (link); Kirschbaum and Hellhammer, 1994 (link)). Salivary free cortisol gradually increases within about 10 min, and peaks around 10–30 min after stressor cessation (Foley and Kirschbaum, 2010 (link)). Saliva was collected using Salivette sampling devices (Sarstedt, Rommelsdorf, Germany). Participants were asked to keep the samples collected on the three morning prior to the test day in their freezers and return them to the laboratory on their test day. On that day, before and after the TSST, eight saliva samples were collected from each participant. The baseline was calculated by the mean of the first three samplings before the onset of the TSST (-20, -10, -2 min), the endocrine response to the psychosocial stressor was computed from the samples obtained after the onset of the TSST (+15, +30, +45, +60, +75 min), resulting in six repeated cortisol measures. Saliva samples were stored at -20°C and sent to the University of Trier (Germany) for biochemical analysis of free cortisol concentration. Cortisol was analyzed by a time-resolved immunoassay with fluorescence detection (Dressendörfer et al., 1992 (link)). Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were below 9.0%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Infant Salivary Cortisol Reactivity Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Saliva samples were taken during the 14-month lab visit with Salivette sampling devices (Sarstedt, Rommelsdorf, Germany). Samples were centrifuged and frozen at -80 °C and analyzed by the Kirschbaum laboratory (Technical University of Dresden, Biological Psychology, Germany). Salivary cortisol concentrations were assessed with a chemiluminescence imunnoassay (CLIA; IBL Hamburg, Germany). Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were below 7% and below 9%, respectively. Cortisol concentrations above the 99th percentile (>200 nmol/L) were excluded (n = 12) from the analyses. Cortisol reactivity was determined by calculation of the difference between cortisol concentration 15 minutes after the SSP (post-SSP cortisol) and cortisol concentrations prior to the SSP (pre-SSP cortisol). Mean sampling time of pre-SSP cortisol was 11:26 a.m. (SD = 2:01 h), mean sampling time of post-SSP cortisol was 12:22 p.m. (SD = 2:00 h). We had information on corticosteroid medication for 248 infants. None of these infants used systemic corticosteroid medication, but five infants used other corticosteroid-containing medication. Since these infants did not differ significantly in cortisol reactivity from infants without corticosteroid-containing medication (t(246) < .01, p > .99, d < 0.01), they were included in all further analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Saliva Cortisol and Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Saliva was collected to assess free cortisol concentrations [36 (link)] as a marker of HPA axis activity. The samples were collected using Salivette sampling devices (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany). Participants collected saliva in the late evening (23:00h) and the next morning of the day following the university appointment. Saliva was collected upon awakening and thirty minutes later in order to assess the cortisol awakening response [37 (link)]. Free cortisol concentrations were analyzed without prior extraction using a commercial Chemoluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA; IBL International, Hamburg, Germany). All inter- and intra-assay variations were below 10%. A complete set of cortisol data for all 5 session could be obtained from 29 participants.
Immunological phenotyping was performed using blood samples as recently described [38 (link)]. Using the methods described in this publication we determined the absolute number of T cells, B cells, NK cells and monocytes in whole blood. Using flow cytometry we performed an analysis of NK and T lymphocyte subpopulations. We stimulated whole blood samples with Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and measured the production of IL-6 and TNF-α. Finally, we determined the concentrations of cytokines in serum samples. The biological functions of the different immune parameters investigated in this study are detailed in a recent publication [38 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Salivary Cortisol Circadian Rhythm Sampling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants were provided with detailed instructions regarding the collection of four salivary cortisol samples. Using Salivette sampling devices (Sarstedt, Newton, NC), participants were instructed to collect the first sample immediately upon waking, and the remaining samples 30-, 45-, and 60-min post-waking. Participants were also instructed not to eat, drink, smoke, or brush their teeth prior to and during the sampling period. We relied on participants’ self-report regarding the timing of each sample to examine protocol adherence. Samples were stored in participants’ freezers until research staff collected them, and were then stored in a −80°C freezer until shipped to the Center for Psychobiology and Psychosomatic Research (Trier, Germany) for assay. Samples were analyzed according to a time-resolved immunoassay with fluorescence detection (DELPIA40 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cortisol Sampling Methodology for Awakening Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cortisol sampling procedures followed Pruessner et al.’s (Pruessner, Kirschbaum, Meinlschmid, & Hellhammer, 2003 (link)) recommendations for collecting waking cortisol samples. Saliva samples were collected with Salivette sampling devices (Sarstedt, Newton, NC) at four time points during the first hour after waking: upon waking and 30-, 45-, and 60-minutes after waking (Wust et al., 2000 ). Participants were asked to complete the saliva samples over two consecutive weekdays (not on Saturdays or Sundays) and to not eat, drink, smoke, or brush teeth before or during the sample period. Participants recorded the exact times they completed the samples, current medications, and other specifics about the collection (i.e. whether they smoked that morning or if they used an alarm upon waking). Saliva samples were collected and stored at −80 °C until sent to be assayed at the Center for Psychobiology and Psychosomatic Research in Trier, Germany. Analysis included a time-resolved immunoassay with fluorescence detection (Dressendörfer, Kirschbaum, Rohde, Stahl, & Strasburger, 1992 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!